Slave boson

The Slave Boson method is a method for dealing with models of strongly correlated systems, providing a method to second-quantize valence fluctuations within a restrictive manifold of states. In the 1960s the physicist John Hubbard introduced an operator, now named the "Hubbard Operator"[1] to describe the creation of an electron within a restrictive manifold of valence configurations. Consider for example, a rare earth or actinide ion in which strong Coulomb interactions restrict the charge fluctuations to two valence states, such as the Ce4+(4f0) and Ce3+ (4f1) configurations of a mixed valent Cerium compound. The corresponding quantum states of these two states are the singlet state and the magnetic state, where is the spin. The fermionic Hubbard operators that link these states are then

 

 

 

 

(1)

The algebra of operators is closed by introducing the two bosonic operators

.

 

 

 

 

(2)

Together, these operators satisfy the graded Lie algebra

 

 

 

 

(3)

where the and the sign is chosen to be negative, unless both A and B are fermions, when it is positive. The Hubbard operators are the generators of the super group SU(2|1). This non-canonical algebra means that these operators do not satisfy a Wick's theorem, which prevents a conventional diagrammatic or field theoretic treatment.

In 1983 Piers Coleman introduced the Slave Boson formulation of the Hubbard operators[2], which enabled valence fluctuations to be treated within a field-theoretic approach[3]. In this approach, the spinless configuration of the ion is represented by a spinless "slave boson" , whereas the magnetic configuration is represented by an Abrikosov slave fermion. From these considerations, it is seen that the Hubbard operators can be written as

 

 

 

 

(4)

and

.

 

 

 

 

(5)

This factorization of the Hubbard operators faithfully preserves the graded Lie algebra. Moreover, the Hubbard operators so written commute with the conserved quantity

.

 

 

 

 

(5)

In Hubbard's original approach, Q=1, but by generalizing this quantity to larger values, higher irreducible representations of SU(2|1) are generated. The slave boson representation can be extended from two component to N component fermions, where the spin index runs over N values. By allowing N to become large, while maintaining the ratio Q/N, it is possible to develop a controlled large N expansion.

The slave boson approach has since been widely applied to strongly correlated electron systems, and has proven useful in developing the resonating valence bond theory(RVB) of high temperature superconductivity[4][5] and the understanding of heavy fermion compounds[6].

Bibliography

  1. Hubbard, John (1964). "Electron correlations in narrow energy bands. II. The degenerate band case". Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A. The Royal Society. 277 (1369): 237–259. doi:10.1098/rspa.1964.0019.
  2. Piers Coleman (1984). "A New Approach to the Mixed Valence Problem". Phys. Rev. B. The American Physical Society. 29 (6): 3035–3044. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.29.3035.
  3. N. Read and D. M. Newns (1983). "A new functional integral formalism for the degenerate Anderson model". Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics. 16 (29): L1055–L1060. doi:10.1088/0022-3719/16/29/007.
  4. P. W. Anderson, G. Baskaran, Z. Zhou and T. Hsu (1987). "Resonating–valence-bond theory of phase transitions and superconductivity in La2CuO4-based compounds". Physical Review Letters. The American Physical Society. 58 (26): 2790–2793. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.2790.CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link)
  5. G. Kotliar and J. Liu (1988). "Superexchange mechanism and d-wave superconductivity". Physical Review B. The American Physical Society. 38 (7): 5142–5145. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.38.5142.
  6. A. J. Millis and P.A. Lee (1986). "Large-orbital-degeneracy expansion for the lattice Anderson model". Physical Review B. The American Physical Society. 35 (7): 3394–3414. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.35.3394.CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link)
  • Coleman, Piers (15 March 1984). "New approach to the mixed-valence problem". Physical Review B. American Physical Society (APS). 29 (6): 3035–3044. doi:10.1103/physrevb.29.3035. ISSN 0163-1829.


gollark: yes.
gollark: Where something can just be two types because ??? and you can't tell the difference.
gollark: An untagged union is like a C union.
gollark: Personally, very late, I find Rust's tooling (cargo) much nicer than, say, python's.Also, tagged unions good, regular unions bad?
gollark: But those are the most funnestest things?
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.