Shooting at the 2012 Summer Paralympics – Mixed 10 metre air rifle prone SH1
The Mixed 10 metre air rifle prone SH1 event at the 2012 Summer Paralympics took take place on 1 September at the Royal Artillery Barracks in Woolwich.
| Mixed 10 metre air rifle prone SH1 at the XIV Paralympic Games | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Venue | Royal Artillery Barracks | ||||||||||||
| Dates | 1 September | ||||||||||||
| Medalists | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| Shooting at the 2012 Summer Paralympics | ||
|---|---|---|
.svg.png) | ||
| Rifle – SH1 | ||
| 50m rifle three positions | men | women |
| 50m rifle prone | mixed | |
| 10m air rifle standing | men | women |
| 10m air rifle prone | mixed | |
| Rifle – SH2 | ||
| 10m air rifle prone | mixed | |
| 10m air rifle standing | mixed | |
| Pistol – SH1 | ||
| 50m pistol | mixed | |
| 25m pistol | mixed | |
| 10m air pistol | men | women |
The event consists of two rounds: a qualifier and a final. In the qualifier, each shooter fires 60 shots with an air rifle at 10 metres distance from the prone position. Scores for each shot are in increments of 1, with a maximum score of 10.
The top 8 shooters in the qualifying round move on to the final round. There, they fire an additional 10 shots. These shots score in increments of .1, with a maximum score of 10.9. The total score from all 70 shots is used to determine final ranking.[1]
Qualification round
| Rank | Athlete | Country | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Total | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Q Qualified for final
Final
| Rank | Athlete | Country | Qual | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Final | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |
Cédric Fèvre |  |
600 | 10.4 | 10.7 | 10.8 | 10.8 | 10.7 | 10.4 | 10.9 | 10.7 | 10.7 | 10.6 | 106.7 | 706.7 |
 |
Matthew Skelhon |  |
600 | 10.8 | 10.5 | 10.7 | 10.8 | 10.4 | 10.8 | 10.2 | 10.9 | 10.7 | 10.6 | 106.4 | 706.4 |
 |
Cuiping Zhang |  |
600 | 10.6 | 10.8 | 10.6 | 10.5 | 10.9 | 10.6 | 10.8 | 9.7 | 10.6 | 10.7 | 105.8 | 705.8 |
| 4 | Jae-Young Sim |  |
600 | 10.6 | 10.8 | 10.4 | 10.6 | 10.6 | 10.5 | 10.4 | 10.6 | 10.6 | 10.5 | 105.6 | 705.6 |
| 5 | Azzurra Ciani |  |
600 | 10.5 | 10.7 | 10.6 | 10.5 | 10.6 | 10.6 | 10.3 | 10.9 | 9.9 | 10.3 | 104.9 | 704.9 |
| 6 | Natascha Hiltrop |  |
600 | 10.5 | 10.6 | 10.2 | 10.6 | 10.4 | 10.7 | 10.4 | 10.7 | 10.2 | 10.1 | 104.4 | 704.4 |
| 7 | Reinaldo Saavedra |  |
600 | 10.3 | 10.8 | 10.6 | 10.4 | 10.6 | 10.1 | 10.7 | 10.2 | 10.3 | 10.3 | 104.3 | 704.3 |
| 8 | Sergey Nochevnoy |  |
600 | 10.8 | 10.3 | 10.9 | 10.5 | 10.2 | 10.5 | 9.6 | 10.6 | 10.2 | 10.5 | 104.1 | 704.1 |
gollark: Now, part of that is probably that you can't really trust whoever is asking to use those resources properly, and that's fair. But there are now things for comparing the effectiveness of different charities and whatnot.
gollark: But if you ask "hey, random person, would you be willing to give up some amount of money/resources/etc to stop people dying of malaria", people will just mostly say no.
gollark: If you *ask* someone "hey, random person, would you like people in Africa to not die of malaria", they will obviously say yes. Abstractly speaking, people don't want people elsewhere to die of malaria.
gollark: Capitalism is why we have a massively effective (okay, mostly, some things are bad and need fixing, like intellectual property) economic engine here which can produce tons of stuff people want. But people *do not care* about diverting that to help faraway people they can't see.
gollark: Helping people elsewhere does mean somewhat fewer resources available here, and broadly speaking people do not actually want to make that tradeoff.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.