Seedfeeder

Seedfeeder is the pseudonym of an illustrator known for contributing sexually explicit drawings to Wikipedia. Between 2008 and 2012, the artist created 48 depictions of various sex acts. Seedfeeder's illustrations garnered negative and positive reactions: some Wikipedia editors claimed they contained racist and sexist undertones, while Andy Cush of Gawker called him "Wikipedia's greatest artist of sex acts". Artnet columnist Paddy Johnson listed Seedfeeder's work as one of the "Top 10 Digital Artworks of 2014".

For the type of bird feeder, see Bird feeder § Seed feeders.
Seedfeeder's illustration of a prostitute speaking with a man in a parked vehicle

Work

Seedfeeder contributed 48 drawings of various sex acts to 35 English-language Wikipedia articles;[1] these have also been used in other language editions of Wikipedia. They are available for adaptation and reuse under the conditions of a Creative Commons license.[2] The images are vector graphics with gradient colors and neutral backgrounds;[3] Seedfeeder said that he lacked the skills to make complex backgrounds.[2] Seedfeeder stated that he was influenced by the simplified style of aircraft safety cards.[3] He contributed drawings to the following Wikipedia articles, among others:[3][4]

Seedfeeder retired from Wikipedia in June 2012.[6]

Reception

General reactions
Seedfeeder's illustration of a woman blowing a kiss upon his retirement.[5]

Seedfeeder's images received media coverage in numerous languages and publications.[7] In 2014, Gawker's Andy Cush published an article about Seedfeeder's "frank, graphic" illustrations,[7] and a companion gallery called "The Best of Seedfeeder, Wikipedia's Greatest Sex Illustrator", which he described as a collection of the artist's "greatest works".[5] In his Gawker piece, Cush called Seedfeeder "Wikipedia's greatest artist of sex acts" and his work "unmistakable" and "nearly as striking as [the] subject matter".[3] Cyriaque Lamar of Cracked.com called the images "goddamn hilarious" and also compared them to airline safety pamphlets. Lamar acknowledged their educational value but criticized them for being too pornographic for pedagogical purposes.[8] The Cracked.com article included a gallery of the six "most terrifying sex illustrations on Wikipedia".[8][9]

The Huffington Post's Andres Jauregui said the illustrations were "anything but shy" and that "by rendering intense acts of coupling in a sterile, almost instructional manner, Seedfeeder's drawings have a normalizing effect on bedroom play that some might consider taboo".[7] He wrote that the sexual acts Seedfeeder illustrates "aren't weird, but the plastic, detached style in which they're rendered is bizarrely matter-of-fact, like the airline safety pamphlets that the illustrator says inspired them". Furthermore, he said: "Some wouldn't consider it art, but it's not porn, either. The drawings are educational, but they serve a purpose beyond illustration."[7] Artnet columnist Paddy Johnson listed Seedfeeder's work as one of the "Top 10 Digital Artworks of 2014".[10]

Negative reactions

Seedfeeder's drawings were also met with controversy. Some Wikipedia contributors perceived there to be racist and sexist undertones, resulting in the removal of some images from English-language Wikimedia projects.[3] A depiction of a facial featuring a black man ejaculating onto a white woman prompted criticism, with some users claiming that the image was racist and promoted violence against women.[2]

Seedfeeder responded to those who argued that descriptions of sex acts without accompanying images would be best by saying: "I come from a philosophical viewpoint that every Wikipedia article should have all forms of media available associated with it. Images, audio, and video. All articles, without exception. So any argument predicated on 'an image isn't necessary' is one that carries absolutely zero weight. None."[7] In an interview with NaTemat, sexologist Andrzej Depko defended the images, saying that images of sexual activity are nothing new and that people should not be offended by sex.[2]

Seedfeeder also responded to criticism that children could discover his illustrations by writing, "if your children are actively searching for these kind of topics... it's because they already have a slight idea of them... and they feel ready to know more."[7]

gollark: I need DDR3 ECC UDIMMs.
gollark: If you don't like this, then... buy... me... RAM?
gollark: Due to problems.
gollark: I disabled it.
gollark: Fortunately, ABR userdata still works. Unfortunately, the code for that feature is not ideal.

See also

References
  1. "Die Geschichte von Wikipedias bekanntestem Sex-Illustrator". derstandard.at. Retrieved 26 September 2015.
  2. Schwarzenberg-Czerny, Urszula (2015). "To on zilustrował seks na Wikipedii. 48 osiem rysunków, które obrazują, co w łóżku się dzieje". NaTemat.pl (in Polish). Retrieved 3 October 2015.
  3. Cush, Andy (November 12, 2014). "Wikipedia's Greatest Sex Illustrator Is an Anonymous Legend: Seedfeeder". Gawker. Retrieved November 15, 2014.
  4. "Can Men Fake Orgasms? And Other Debates on Wikipedia's Sex Pages". Vice Motherboard. Retrieved 26 September 2015.
  5. Cush, Andy (November 12, 2014). "The Best of Seedfeeder, Wikipedia's Greatest Sex Illustrator". Gawker. Retrieved November 15, 2014.
  6. Goorwich, Siam. "NSFW: Seedfeeder is the greatest X-rated sex artist you've never heard of". Metro. Retrieved 11 March 2017.
  7. Jauregui, Andres (November 12, 2014). "Wikipedia's SeedFeeder Is The Weirdest Sex Illustrator You've Never Heard Of (NSFW)". The Huffington Post. Retrieved November 14, 2014.
  8. Lamar, Cyriaque (February 26, 2013). "The 6 Most Terrifying Sex Illustrations on Wikipedia". Cracked.com. Demand Media. p. 1. Retrieved November 14, 2014.
  9. Lamar, Cyriaque (February 26, 2013). "The 6 Most Terrifying Sex Illustrations on Wikipedia". Cracked.com. Demand Media. p. 2. Retrieved November 14, 2014.
  10. Johnson, Paddy. "The Top 10 Digital Artworks of 2014". Artnet News. Retrieved 25 September 2015.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.