Scott L. Fenstermaker

Scott L. Fenstermaker is an American criminal defense lawyer, based in New York City.[1]

Education
Education[2]
1984B.S.United States Air Force Academy
1992J.D.Harvard Law School

He is notable for volunteering to serve detainees at Guantanamo Bay detention camp in their attempts to access the U.S. justice system.[1] According to the American Lawyer there are insufficient lawyers with experience defending death sentence cases to assist the Guantanamo detainees charged with capital offenses.

In a series of court documents Fenstermaker described difficulties meeting with, and corresponding with Guantanamo detainees.[3][4][5][6][7][8][9]

He described writing to, and receiving authorization to serve as the counsel for two of the fourteen "high value detainees" transferred to military custody in Guantanamo from covert detention in the CIA's network of black sites in September 2006.

On June 1, 2009 the New York Times published an article about the dispute over who was going to represent Ahmed Ghailani, the first Guantanamo detainee to be transferred from military custody to face trial in the US civilian court system.[2] According to the article US District Court Judge Kevin Thomas Duffy ordered an explanation from Fenstermaker as to how he became Ghailani's lawyer.

Civil Action No. 08-cv-1085

Civil Action No. 08-cv-1085 is a writ of habeas corpus filed after the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Boumediene v. Bush.

Fenstermaker and another team of lawyers have both filed petitions on behalf of Rahim Al Nashiri—one of the fourteen "high value detainees" transferred from CIA's network of secret interrogation centers known as "black site."

On 3 October 2008 United States district court Judge Thomas F. Hogan ordered Fenstermaker to show cause why the petition he filed on behalf of Al Nashiri shouldn't be dismissed, as a duplication of Civil Action No. 08-cv-1207.[6] Hogan wrote that 08-cv-1207, filed on behalf of Al Nashiri by lawyers in the office of the Nevada Public Defender had been directly authorized, whereas Fenstermaker's was not. Fenstermaker replied that he had a longer history with Al Nashiri than the Nevada lawyers and that he had letters authorizing him to act on behalf of Al-Nashiri, whereas the Nevada lawyers do not.

On January 6, 2009 Fenstermaker submitted a "proposed order" to Thomas F. Hogan.[10] The proposed order would have ordered the Department of Defense to stop interfering with Fenstermaker's ability to communicate with Ammar Al Baluchi and Mustafa Bin Ammad Al Hawsawi, and to allow Fenstermaker to travel to Guantanamo to meet with them. On January 13, 2009 Hogan issued the order that Fenstermaker had proposed.[11]

On March 25, 2009 Fenstermaker filed a "preliminary statement" in Ammar Al Baluchi v. Robert M. Gates.[12][13] His statement was a response to a March 2, 2009 filing from the Department of Justice which they called an "Opposition to motion to file a document under seal". Fenstermaker said that Al Baluchi had authorized him to serve as his attorney in a letter he drafted on May 26, 2008, but that the letter had not reached him until August 2008.

Fenstermaker told the court that he still hadn't been allowed to meet with Al Baluchi, that physical letters were the only way he and Al Baluchi had communicated, and that since July 2008 the Department of Defense had been returning his letters to him, rather than delivering them.[12] Consequently, he told the court, Al Baluchi was unaware of the activities he was taking on his behalf. Fenstermaker told the court that the new letter of authorization the Department of Justice was arguing he should be required to file was not reasonable, since the Department of Defense was interfering with his ability to send and receive mail with Al Baluchi.

gollark: Great!
gollark: Also, I seem to have unfathomably lost a program I need, this is HIGHLY troubling.
gollark: I think that if your system can't be deployed without being used everywhere at once, it's utter bees and should not occur.
gollark: Living standards have still consistently increased for pretty much everyone for ages, governments are the ones going to war and covertly operating and you can't really get around this given the existence of scarcity, worldwide extreme poverty is declining and literacy is increasing, etc.
gollark: And yet it somewhat works ish, apparently better than many of the things called "communism" over the æges.

References
  1. Daphne Eviatar (2008-05-29). "Covington & Burling partner takes on defense of Guantanamo death penalty case". AM Law Daily. Retrieved 2008-12-10.
  2. Benjamin Wieser (2009-06-01). "Dispute Erupts Over Lawyer for Detainee". New York Times. Retrieved 2009-07-25.
  3. Robert J. Branman (2008-09-11). "Guantanamo Bay Detainee Litigation: Doc 408 -- RESPONDENTS' REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO RECONSIDER APPLICATION OF STANDARD HABEAS PROTECTIVE ORDER AND REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER PERTAINING TO TOP SECRET / SENSITIVE COMPARTMENTED INFORMATION" (PDF). United States Department of Justice. Retrieved 2008-12-10.
  4. Brian J. Neff (2008-09-24). "Guantanamo Bay Detainee Litigation: Doc 521 -- REPLY IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF MOTION TO INTERVENE" (PDF). United States Department of Justice. Retrieved 2008-12-10.
  5. Andrew I. Warden (2008-09-26). "Guantanamo Bay Detainee Litigation: Doc 532 -- REPLY TO PETITIONER'S REDACTED OPPOSITION TO RESPONDENTS' MOTION TO RECONSIDER APPLICATION OF STANDARD HABEAS PROTECTIVE ORDER TO THESE CASES AND REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER PERTAINING TO TOP SECRET / SENSITIVE COMPARTMENTED INFORMATION" (PDF). United States Department of Justice. Retrieved 2008-12-10.
  6. Thomas F. Hogan (2008-10-03). "Guantanamo Bay Detainee Litigation: Doc 632 -- Order" (PDF). United States Department of Justice. Retrieved 2008-11-17. Petitioner Abd Al-Rahim Hussain Mohammed Al-Nashiri, also known as Abdul Rahim Hussein Muhammed Al-Nashir, ("Al-Nashiri") (ISN 10015) currently has a habeas petition pending before this Court in each of the above-captioned cases. The Federal Public Defender for the District of Nevada, through attorney Paul Turner and other assistant federal public defenders, filed the petition in 08-cv-1207, and attorney Scott Fenstermaker filed the petition in 08-cv-1085. A review of the records in these matters reveals that the petition filed by the Nevada Public Defender was directly authorized, while the petition filed by Mr. Fenstermaker was not. Because Al-Nashiri cannot proceed with duplicate habeas petitions before this Court, the Court
  7. Thomas F. Hogan (2008-10-07). "Guantanamo Bay Detainee Litigation: Doc 661 --" (PDF). United States Department of Justice. Retrieved 2008-12-10.
  8. Jean Lin (2008-10-15). "Guantanamo Bay Detainee Litigation: Doc 773 -- SUPPLEMENTAL REPLY TO PETITIONERS' REDACTED OPPOSITIONS TO RESPONDENTS' MOTION TO RECONSIDER APPLICATION OF STANDARD HABEAS PROTECTIVE ORDER TO THESE CASES AND REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER PERTAINING TO TOP SECRET / SENSITIVE COMPARTMENTED INFORMATION" (PDF). United States Department of Justice. Retrieved 2008-12-10.
  9. Jonathan S. Needle (2008-10-31). "Guantanamo Bay Detainee Litigation: Doc 901 -- RESPONDENTS' RESPONSE TO "PETITIONER'S RESPONSE TO THE OCTOBER 3, 2008 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND MOTION FOR MISCELLANEOUS RELIEF"" (PDF). United States Department of Justice. Retrieved 2008-12-10.
  10. Scott L. Fenstermaker (2009-01-06). "Guantanamo Bay Detainee Litigation: Doc 1507 -- Notice of proposed order" (PDF). United States Department of Justice. Retrieved 2009-06-02.
  11. Thomas F. Hogan (2009-01-13). "Guantanamo Bay Detainee Litigation: Doc 1506 -- Order" (PDF). United States Department of Justice. Retrieved 2009-06-02.
  12. Scott L. Fenstermaker (2009-03-05). "Guantanamo Bay Detainee Litigation: Doc 1666 -- preliminary statement" (PDF). United States Department of Justice. Retrieved 2009-06-02.
  13. Scott L. Fenstermaker (2009-03-06). "Guantanamo Bay Detainee Litigation: Doc 1673 -- correction" (PDF). United States Department of Justice. Retrieved 2009-06-02.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.