Sarus the Goth

Sarus or Saurus (d. 413 AD) was a Gothic chieftain and commander for the emperor Honorius.[1] He was known for his hostility to the prominent Gothic brothers-in-law Alaric I and Ataulf, and was the brother of Sigeric, who ruled the Goths briefly in 415.

Career

Nothing is known of his life before he comes to notice in 406 commanding a force of Gothic troops, along with other barbarian foederati, against the invasion of Italy by Radagaisus of 405-6.[2] Roman and federate troops ultimately defeated the invaders at the Battle of Faesulae.

In 407 he was sent against the British usurper Constantine III.[3] First he defeated and killed Iustinianus, one of Constantine's magistri militum, then tricked and killed the other, Nebiogastes. Then Sarus laid siege to Constantine himself in Valentia, but fled back to Italy at the approach of Constantine's new generals Edobichus and Gerontius, being forced to surrender all his booty to Bacaudae (late Roman bandits or rebels) for passage over the Alps.[4] As he must have commanded an army, he may have been appointed magister militum (general) for this expedition;[5] elsewhere he is said to have had a following or warband of only about three hundred.[6]

Early in 408, whilst commanding a force of barbarians at Ravenna, Stilicho induced him to mutiny in an attempt to prevent Honorius from travelling there. Then, when Stilicho was recalled by the Emperor under suspicion of treachery, Sarus, apparently incensed that Stilicho continued to obey orders and refused to use the barbarian troops on hand to defend himself, fought his way through Stilicho's Hun bodyguard to protest.[7] Later in 408, after the fall of Stilicho, Sarus' name was put forward as Stilicho's successor as the most suitable candidate for the office of magister militum in praesenti (supreme commander), but the Emperor Honorius refused to promote him.[8] It is possible his resentment of Honorius, as borne out by later actions, started here [9]

We next hear of Sarus in 410, apparently subsisting independently in the region of Picenum. Ataulf, who was coming to join his brother-in-law Alaric, decided to attack him in passing and Sarus, thinking his force of three hundred would be no match for the Gothic army, fled to Honorius.[10] Later that year, when Alaric was conducting negotiations with Honorius near Ravenna, Sarus with his warband attacked him, seemingly on his own initiative. This prompted Alaric to finally give up on negotiations and sack Rome on August 24.[11]

Death and aftermath

Sarus seems to have stayed in the service of the Emperor for the next two years, but when in 412 another usurper, Jovinus, approached from Northern Gaul, supported at first by Ataulf, he went to join him because of a grudge against Honorius, who had failed to investigate or avenge the murder of his servant.[12] Sarus had only twenty eight men with him, but Ataulf gathered a force of ten thousand to waylay him. Even so, Sarus fought with marvellous courage and was only with difficulty taken alive, to be soon killed.[13]

Sarus' last contribution to the events of the time were posthumous. Ataulf had been foolish enough to take one of Sarus' followers into his own service; this man waited till Ataulf visited his stable alone and there killed him (September 415).[14] Sarus' brother, Sigeric, then ruled for seven days before Wallia killed him and took over the kingship.[15]

Sarus was active for only six years in an extremely confused period, yet he made his mark as a figure of some importance in several large and small events of those years. Unfortunately a bald account of his deeds gives a very disjointed picture of him, but he obviously made an impression on those of his time, who describe him as "a brave and invincible warrior", possessing "marvellous heroism",[16] who "excelled all the other confederates in power and rank" and had "intrepidity" and "experience in warlike affairs".[17]

  1. Doyle, Chris (2018). Honorius: The Fight for the Roman West AD395-423. New York & London: Routledge Roman Imperial Biographies. ISBN 9781138190887.
  2. Orosius VII 37
  3. Doyle, Christopher (2014). The Endgame of Treason: Suppressing Rebellion and Usurpation in the Late Roman Empire AD 397‑411. National University of Ireland: Unpublished doctoral thesis. pp. 7–8, 16ff., 163–192.
  4. Zosimus VI 2; Kulkowsky (2000), p. 334
  5. PLRE II p. 978; Boak (1915) p. 159 considers him to have definitely been a magistri militum.
  6. Zosimus VI 13; Olympiodorus fr. 3
  7. Zosimus V 34
  8. Zosimus V.36, though Philostorgius Historia Ecclesiastica XII.3 claims he was made magister militum in praesenti.
  9. PLRE II p. 979
  10. Zosimus VI 13
  11. Sozomen IV 9; Bury (1923), p. 183
  12. This is the reason Boak regards Sarus as a magister militum: the servant, Belleridus, is described as a domesticum, one of the official servants of a general. However it is certain that the future Constantius III was supreme commander in the West by 412; perhaps Sarus was a subordinate general. Boak (1915) p. 159
  13. Olympiodorus fr. 17; Bury (1923) p. 194
  14. Olympiodorus fr. 25
  15. It is easy to see a conspiracy here, as did Bury (1923) p. 199
  16. Olympiodorus fragments 3 and 17
  17. Zosimus V.34 and 36. There are several more citations in a similar vein.

Notes
gollark: They just tacked piles of features on with no regard for how they fit together.
gollark: Based on my limited experience of low level things, and C++'s poor design, C++ use → suffering.
gollark: Perhaps it was, but one which happened to get written into religious books somehow.
gollark: 17% of known gods/theomorphic entities are currently in containment at Site 922-G.
gollark: Yeees, it sounds kind of outside the context they had at the time.

References

Ancient

Modern
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.