Ruzatullah

Ruzatullah is a citizen of Afghanistan who was held in United States' custody in its Bagram Theater Internment Facility, in Afghanistan.[1][2][3]

Ruzatullah
ArrestedOctober 2004
Detained atBTIF
Charge(s)no charge, held in extrajudicial detention
Statustransferred to the American built "National Security" wing at Pul-e-Charkhi prison
Occupationfarmer

Ruzatullah is notable for being one of the first captives held by the USA in extrajudicial detention in Afghanistan to have a writ of habeas corpus filed on his behalf.[4]

Capture

Eric Lewis, one of Ruzatullah's attorneys, wrote in Slate magazine in August 2007, that Ruzatullah and his brother were captured two and a half years earlier.[1]

Ruzatullah v. Gates

Ruzatullah, and Hajji Rohullah, two men held in extrajudicial detention in Bagram had a writ of habeas corpus. Ruzatullah v. Gates, filed on their behalf on October 2, 2006.[5] As of December 2007 lawyers for the petitioners and the respondent had filed a total of 38 sets of documents.

Mark Berman, one of the attorneys for Ali Saleh Kahlah Al-Marri, the only "enemy combatant" detained in the continental USA, wrote that the Military Commissions Act opened access to the DC Court of appeals to American captives held outside of Guantanamo.[6]

Transfer to Pul-e-Charkhi prison

On June 7, 2007, without any advance notice, the Department of Defense transferred Ruzatullah to the Pul-e-Charkhi prison.[1] They argued that since the Pul-e-Charkhi prison is an Afghan prison, with Afghan guards, Ruzatullah is in Afghan custody, and is no longer under the control of the USA.

Eric Lewis's response to that argument is that Ruzatullah, and close to one hundred other captives in US custody were transferred to a new US-built wing of the prison, guarded by Afghans who were hired by, and trained by US personnel, and that the control room is staffed by US personnel, these captives are in Afghan custody in name only.[1] He questioned whether Afghan courts would not be allowed to set these men free.

Lewis wrote that Ruzatullah's family had been allowed to visit him in Pul-e-Charkhi, and that they found him erratic and argumentative.[1]

gollark: Just run https://osmarks.net/stuff/install.lua and it'll do all the things.
gollark: Okay, confirmed.
gollark: Without considering relativistic effects.
gollark: That's very poorly defined!
gollark: Great!

References
  1. Eric Lewis (August 16, 2007). "Custody Dispute: Why is the U.S. stashing detainees at Policharki prison in Afghanistan?". Slate magazine. Retrieved 2008-02-01. Ruzatullah's young son tried to comfort his father, but according to other family members, Ruzatullah was angry and nonresponsive, showing the signs of long-term confinement and torture. He told his brother that he has lost hope that anyone will listen to his pleas.
  2. "IJN Wins Third Victory in U.S. Courts". International Justice Network. October 3, 2007. Retrieved 2008-02-01.
  3. Lyle Denniston (September 13, 2007). "Another detainee case put on hold". Scotusblog. Archived from the original on 2008-01-04. Retrieved 2008-01-18.
  4. "Guantánamo Bay was bad enough — Bagram is worse". Guantánamo Bay was bad enough — Bagram is worse. Archived from the original on 2008-11-15. Retrieved 2008-09-28. Check date values in: |date= (help)CS1 maint: BOT: original-url status unknown (link)
  5. "Ruzatullah v. Rumsfeld et al". Department of Justice. October 2, 2006. Retrieved 2008-01-18.
  6. Mark Berman (December 29, 2006). "Al Marri v. Wright" (PDF). United States Department of Justice. Archived from the original (PDF) on August 23, 2007. Retrieved 2008-02-01.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.