Rule egoism

Rule egoism is the doctrine under which an individual evaluates the optimal set of rules according to whether conformity to those rules bring the most benefit to himself.[1] An action, therefore, is right if it promotes his welfare at least as well as any alternative rule available to him.[2] It is associated with foundational egoism, which maintains that normative factors must be grounded in consideration of the agent's well-being - something that rule egoism does but in a way that avoids factoral egoism.[3]

Development

Although it is claimed that Thomas Hobbes is a rule-egoist, the term "rule egoism" was first coined by Richard Brandt in his work "Rationality, Egoism, and Morality, where it was briefly mentioned.[4]

gollark: It's from coast.
gollark: I have a new release, will send over in a few hours?
gollark: https://dragcave.net/teleport/23254be9e00c507ddc58155e5f35ec4d <- that one?
gollark: You mean you put up the CB Copper and can't get a new release for it?
gollark: Why would anyone do ***THAT***?

See also

References
  1. Kagan, Shelly. 1998. Normative Ethics. Westview Press. p. 199
  2. Copp, David (2006). The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 384. ISBN 9780195147797.
  3. Kagan, Shelly (2018-02-12). Normative Ethics. Routledge. ISBN 9780429978289.
  4. Osterberg, Jan (2012). Self and Others: A Study of Ethical Egoism. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. p. 230. ISBN 9789401077965.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.