Roman Frigg

Roman Frigg (born 1972) is a Swiss philosopher, Professor at the London School of Economics and Political Science and director of its Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science.[1] In 2016 he was awarded the Friedrich Wilhelm Bessel Research Award.[2]

Born in Basel, Switzerland, Frigg obtained his MSc in Theoretical Physics at the University of Basel. In 2003 he obtained his PhD in Philosophy at the University of London under Nancy Cartwright and Carl Hoefer with the thesis, entitled Re-presenting Scientific Representation.

After graduation Frigg started his academic career at the London School of Economics. After some years he was appointed Professor of Philosophy in its Department of Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method. He is also visiting professor at the Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich at its Munich Centre for Mathematical Philosophy.

Philosophy

Frigg's philosophy draws from his physics background. He often takes examples from the field to demonstrate how order is emergent, holistic, and contextual by universal and exceptionless laws.[3] For instance, together with Robert Bishop, he explained that there is self-organization and patterns of emergent order in the universe rather than a system being built up just from independently calculated movement of its part.[3] This theory is applied to explain phenomena such as heavenly bodies, global politics, and even family life, among others with the view that a domain is regarded as ordered once its objects are seen as behaving according to a general law.[3]

Along with some philosophers like Gabrielle Contessa and Peter Godfrey-Smith, Frigg also theorizes that there are parallels between theoretical modelling and works of fiction that involve fictional characters.[4] For the philosopher, the best way to understand mathematical models is to approach it as if they were more closely related to literary fictions than to bits of mathematics.[5] This can be demonstrated in the way Frigg draws from Kendall Walton's theory, which offers a framework of understanding games of make-believe and uses it to understand the nature and varieties of representation in the arts of art and fiction.[6] Frigg proposed that scientists' prepared descriptions are analogous to props in games of make believe and that the descriptions do not require imaginings about actual objects but ask us to imagine a model-system.[4] It is believed that this approach addresses the concept of model individuation - that "if models are simply mathematical objects, then when two distinct models use the same mathematics, we will not be able to individuate them as separate objects."[5]

Selected publications
  • Roman Frigg, Re-presenting Scientific Representation. London School of Economics, University of London, September 2003.
  • Roman Frigg, Matthew Hunter (eds.). Beyond mimesis and convention: representation in art and science. Springer Netherlands, 2010.

Articles, a selection:

  • Frigg, Roman. "On the property structure of realist collapse interpretations of quantum mechanics and the so-called "counting anomaly"." International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17.1 (2003): 43-57.
  • Frigg, Roman, and Julian Reiss. "The philosophy of simulation: hot new issues or same old stew?." Synthese 169.3 (2009): 593–613.
  • Frigg, Roman (2006). "Scientific Representation and the Semantic View of Theories" (PDF). Theoria. The University of Chicago Press. 55 (2): 183–206. Retrieved 14 February 2013.
  • Frigg, Roman. "Models and fiction." Synthese 172.2 (2010): 251–268.
  • Roman Frigg and Ioannis Votsis (2011), "Everything you always wanted to know about structural realism but were afraid to ask," European Journal for Philosophy of Science 1(2):227-276, esp. p. 250.
  • Roman, Frigg; Hartmann, Stephan. "Models in Science". In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2012 ed.). Retrieved 24 July 2015.
gollark: Also, there are no sane-defaults convenience wrappers for stuff like "sign/verify data with secret key", "encrypt bytes", etc., like I think "LibNaCl" has in the "real" world.
gollark: I see.
gollark: To what?
gollark: But even though they could probably share some code and stuff, they're separate, hard to find, randomly scattered across the internet, and don't integrate well.
gollark: CC has lots of crypto libraries for various primitives: SHA256, "Ring LWE" for some reason, elliptic curve cryptography, SHA1, AES, ChaCha20.

References
  1. Frigg, Roman; Professor Roman Frigg at lse.ac.uk. Accessed 2017-09-07.
  2. Professor Roman Frigg has won the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation’s prestigious Bessel Research Award at lse.ac.uk, 2016/05/10.
  3. Cartwright, Nancy; Ward, Keith (2016). Rethinking Order: After the Laws of Nature. London: Bloomsbury Publishing. p. 55. ISBN 9781474244060.
  4. Toon, Adam (2012). Models as Make-Believe: Imagination, Fiction and Scientific Representation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. p. 17. ISBN 9780230301214.
  5. Weisberg, Michael (2013). Simulation and Similarity: Using Models to Understand the World. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 46. ISBN 9780199933662.
  6. Walton, Kendall L. "Mimesis as Make-Believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts". Harvard University Press, 1990
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.