Roderick Slater

Roderick W. Slater (April 24, 1937 – June 25, 2019) was an American artist. His works include paintings, etchings, drypoints, and collographs and collages. He is best known for mixed media works combining painting and collage. Slater's collages, composed on rectilinear grids, often include three-dimensional components and fragments of antique paper.

Roderick W. Slater
Born(1937-04-24)April 24, 1937
Goodrich, Michigan
DiedJune 25, 2019(2019-06-25) (aged 82)
Lexington, Virginia
NationalityAmerican
OccupationArtist
Years active1970–2019
Known forCollage

Early life

Born in Goodrich, Michigan, Slater studied art at the National Academy of Design School of Art in New York City.

Work

Two works by Roderick Slater are included in the collection of the Portland Museum of Art in Portland, Maine.[1] Galleries which have exhibited Slater works include the Ann Jacobs Gallery in Atlanta, Georgia, Dryden Galleries, Providence, Rhode Island, Plum Gallery[2] in Kensington, Maryland, and Frost Gully Gallery in Maine. Slater's works have also been sold by auction houses such as Christie's in New York City (August 9, 2005),[3] Skinner Inc. in Boston, Massachusetts (May 15, 2009), Luper Auctions, Richmond, Virginia, and Julia Auctions in Fairfield, Maine. [4][5][6] Slater's work Mnemonic Device was included in Paste and Pixels, a 2001 exhibition at Core Gallery in New Paltz, NY.[7]

Most recently, Roderick Slater had a two-person show at the Staunton Augusta Art Center in Staunton, VA with his Protegé Sarah Bean. The show was titled "Promises We Make To Ourselves: A 15 year dialogue between mentor and student" [8]

A series of black and white drawings by Roderick Slater illustrates the book Up Here in Maine by Gerald E. Lewis, published by Pittsfield Publishers in 1975.

Slater has been cited as an influence by other contemporary artists, including noted American collage artists Jonathan Talbot[9] and Sarah Bean.[10]

Death

Slater died on June 25, 2019 in Lexington, VA.[11]

gollark: Why?
gollark: It's an extreme example which hopefully maybe provides insight into a more realistic case.
gollark: Fascinating.
gollark: If you just doubled the number of people "involved in politics" by some loose definition by taking arbitrary random people, would this actually improve the political situation? I would be surprised if it did; I don't think most have some sort of unique original contribution, but just go for participating in shouting louder at other groups.
gollark: Possibly true but not very relevant.

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.