Robinsonia (moth)
Robinsonia is a genus of moths in the family Erebidae. The genus was erected by Augustus Radcliffe Grote in 1866.[1]
| Robinsonia | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Robinsonia dewitzi | |
Scientific classification  | |
| Kingdom: | Animalia |
| Phylum: | Arthropoda |
| Class: | Insecta |
| Order: | Lepidoptera |
| Superfamily: | Noctuoidea |
| Family: | Erebidae |
| Subfamily: | Arctiinae |
| Subtribe: | Phaegopterina |
| Genus: | Robinsonia Grote, [1866] |
Species
- Robinsonia banghaasi Rothschild, 1911
- Robinsonia bartolana Laguerre & Espinoza, 2006
- Robinsonia boliviana Seitz, 1921
- Robinsonia cajali (Hoffmann, 1934)
- Robinsonia catasticta Hampson, 1916
- Robinsonia deiopea Druce, 1895
- Robinsonia dewitzi Gundlach, 1881
- Robinsonia evanida Schaus, 1905
- Robinsonia exprata (Dognin, 1921)
- Robinsonia flavicorpus Dognin, 1910
- Robinsonia flavomarginata Druce, 1899
- Robinsonia fogra Schaus, 1895
- Robinsonia formula Grote, [1866]
- Robinsonia irregularis Rothschild, 1917
- Robinsonia klagesi Rothschild, 1910
- Robinsonia lefaivrei Schaus, 1895
- Robinsonia longimacula Schaus, 1915
- Robinsonia marginata Rothschild, 1909
- Robinsonia mera (Schaus, 1910)
- Robinsonia milesi Rothschild, 1922
- Robinsonia morula Druce, 1906
- Robinsonia mossi (Rothschild, 1922)
- Robinsonia multimaculata Rothschild, 1909
- Robinsonia polyplagia Schaus, 1901
- Robinsonia praphoea Dognin, 1906
- Robinsonia punctata Rothschild, 1909
- Robinsonia rockstonia Schaus, 1905
- Robinsonia sabata Druce, 1895
- Robinsonia sanea Druce, 1895
- Robinsonia similis Rothschild, 1909
- Robinsonia spitzi (Rothschild, 1933)
- Robinsonia suffusa Rothschild, 1909
- Robinsonia valerana Schaus, 1933
- Robinsonia willingi Travassos, 1964
gollark: Although I think some parsers might *technically* be okay with you reserving 8190 bytes for metadata but then ending it with a null byte early, and handle the offsets accordingly, I would not rely on it.
gollark: Probably. The main issue I can see is that you would have to rewrite the entire metadata block on changes, because start/end in XTMF are offsets from the metadata region's end.
gollark: I thought about that, but:- strings in a binary format will be about the same length- integers will have some space saving, but I don't think it's very significant- it would, in a custom one, be harder to represent complex objects and stuff, which some extensions may be use- you could get some savings by removing strings like "title" which XTMF repeats a lot, but at the cost of it no longer being self-describing, making extensions harder and making debugging more annoying- I am not convinced that metadata size is a significant issue
gollark: I mean, "XTMF with CBOR/msgpack and compression" was being considered as a hypothetical "XTMF2", but I'd definitely want something, well, self-describing.
gollark: Also also, why a binary format?
References
- Savela, Markku. "Robinsonia Grote, [1866]". Lepidoptera and Some Other Life Forms. Retrieved September 24, 2019.
- Pitkin, Brian & Jenkins, Paul. "Search results Family: Arctiidae". Butterflies and Moths of the World. Natural History Museum, London.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.