Richard Boyd

Richard Newell Boyd (born 19 May 1942) is an American philosopher, who spent most of his career teaching philosophy at Cornell University.

Richard Boyd
Born
Richard Newell Boyd

19 May 1942
Washington, D.C.
EducationMIT
EraContemporary philosophy
RegionWestern philosophy
SchoolAnalytic
Scientific realism
Moral realism
ThesisA Recursion-Theoretic Characterization of the Ramified Analytical Hierarchy (1970)
Doctoral advisorRichard Cartwright[1]
Doctoral studentsPaul Horwich, J. D. Trout
Main interests
Philosophy of science
Notable ideas
Causal theory of reference-fixing for theoretical terms[2]

Education and career

Boyd earned his Ph.D. from MIT in 1970. Boyd's doctoral thesis, directed by Richard Cartwright, was titled A Recursion-Theoretic Characterization of the Ramified Analytical Hierarchy.

Boyd taught for most of his career at Cornell University,[3] though he also taught briefly at Harvard University, the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, and the University of California, Berkeley. He has also been a visiting professor at the University of Canterbury in Christchurch, New Zealand, and the University of Melbourne in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Philosophical work

Boyd is best known for his arguments in favor of scientific realism[4] and moral realism.[5]

In the case of scientific realism, Boyd has been a defender of what is called "the miracle argument" according to which if successful scientific theories "were far from the truth...the fact that they are so successful would be miraculous. And given the choice between a straightforward explanation of success and a miraculous explanation, clearly one should prefer the non-miraculous explanation, viz. that our best theories are approximately true."[6]

In the case of moral realism, he is a key figure in the meta-ethical school known as "Cornell Realism." On this view, a moral property like "goodness is a complex natural property that is not directly observable, but nonetheless has a robust causal profile.... 'Goodness' is not synonymous with any simpler set of more directly observable claims. Instead, 'goodness' describes the functionally complex natural property that is the effect of certain characteristic causes, and the cause of certain characteristic effects." [7]

His co-edited book The Philosophy of Science (ISBN 0-262-52156-3) is used in undergraduate and graduate philosophy courses.

gollark: Realistically everyone will use Ender IO.
gollark: How is it centered around NC, anywæy?
gollark: Good, good.
gollark: Presses?
gollark: Do you have a replacement for meteors?

See also

References
  1. "MIT philosophy dissertations"
  2. Thomas S. Kuhn, The Road Since Structure, University of Chicago Press, 2000, p. 196.
  3. "Philosophers Zone: Objective truth". ABC Online. 9 August 2008. Retrieved 25 September 2011.
  4. SEP
  5. Philpapers
  6. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-realism/#MiraArgu
  7. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/naturalism-moral/#CornReal


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.