Review bomb

A review bomb is an Internet phenomenon in which large groups of people leave negative user reviews online for a published work, most commonly a video game or a theatrical film, in an attempt to harm the sales or popularity of a product, particularly to draw attention to an issue with the product or its vendor.[1] While a review bomb may be a result of consumers criticizing the poor quality of the product, it can also be associated with perceived political and cultural issues around the product, its vendor, or related works.[2] This is often done to draw wider and mainstream attention to that issue, especially if the vendor does not have an open communications channel or seems unresponsive to direct feedback,[3][4] but may also as a means of mass-driven coercion or simply a result of trolling.[1] Review bombing is a similar practice to and shares characteristics of vote brigading and cancel culture.

The term is primarily associated with online media review aggregates and storefronts such as Steam, Metacritic, or Rotten Tomatoes. Justifications for these campaigns can include unpopular changes to an established franchise, controversies related to the product, or the behavior of developers or publishers.[1] In response, some of these aggregate systems have devised means to detect or prevent review bombing.

Notable examples

Video games

The increasing prevalence of review bombing was precipitated by the increase in influence of online user reviews in the main storefronts where games are sold, combined with little to no oversight of the content of these reviews. This is particularly true in the case of Steam, the predominant seller of PC games, where user reviews are often the only way for indie games to gain traction on the service.[1] According to Steam Spy, review bombing generally has little effect on a game's sales, and may in fact even increase them due to the resulting wave of publicity.[5] However, it may be a symptom of decreased consumer goodwill, which can have a more long-lasting effect on the publisher, developers or game series being criticized.[5] Depending on how such situations are resolved, the effects of a review bomb may be reversed by the removal of negative reviews as in the case of Titan Souls.[6]

2008–2015

Spore was review bombed on Amazon in 2008 after publisher Electronic Arts incorporated a DRM system that limited buyers' ability to install the game more than three times. This system was meant to prevent piracy of the game, but ultimately led to a coordinated backlash with buyers feeling like they were "renting a broken game."[7]

The website Metacritic was criticized in 2011 for poor oversight of their user reviews, leading to rampant review bombing on popular games such as Bastion and Toy Soldiers: Cold War that brought their user rating to low levels.[8] The game Mass Effect 3 was also review bombed on the site in 2012.[9]

Titan Souls was review bombed in April 2015 by supporters of the YouTuber John "TotalBiscuit" Bain after the indie game's artist Andrew Gleeson mocked a statement that Bain made saying the game was "absolutely not for [him]". Bain, in a following podcast, stated that the developer "has it out for [him]", leading several of his followers to review bomb the game, though Bain later expressed that he did not endorse that behavior.[10][6]

The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim was review bombed in 2015 by customers after the game's introduction of paid mods, leading Valve to reverse their decision and remove the paid mod functionality.[5] Additional review bombs for Skyrim as well as fellow Bethesda game Fallout 4, occurred following the launch of Bethesda Softworks' Creation Club in September 2017, which reintroduced the potential for paid mods.[6]

2017

Nier: Automata was review bombed in April 2017 by Chinese players demanding a translation of the game to Chinese, whom PC Gamer called "a powerful new voice".[5]

Grand Theft Auto V was review bombed throughout June and July 2017 after publisher Take-Two Interactive issued a cease-and-desist against the widely used game modification tool OpenIV, as an attempt to stop single player and multiplayer mods for GTA V and GTA Online. The review bombing reduced GTA V's overall Steam review rating from "positive" to "mixed".[11][6]

Crusader Kings II was review bombed in the same month by customers after Paradox had raised the prices in some regions.[5]

In 2017, Valve changed their policies to make unpaid games of any kind not count towards the game's review scores. The developer of Defender's Quest, Lars Doucet, stated that this policy prevented low priced games from being review bombed.[5] Dota 2 was review bombed in August 2017 after Marc Laidlaw, a former Valve writer for the Half-Life series, posted a "fanfic" on his personal blog that several journalists deduced was the plot for Half-Life 2: Episode 3, which had been planned for release in 2007, but appeared to have become vaporware within Valve. Players were upset that the episode has not been released, and review bombed Dota 2 believing that Valve's backing of the game led them to drop work on the Half-Life series.[12][6] That same month, Steam users review bombed Sonic Mania in protest of its use of Denuvo DRM, which was not disclosed by Sega on the game's store page on launch day. Sega responded by claiming the ‘offline play bug’ had been patched, and a Denuvo warning was added to the game's Steam page.[13]

Firewatch was review bombed on Steam in September 2017 after its developer, Campo Santo, filed a DMCA takedown against a video PewDiePie made of their game, following an incident where PewDiePie uttered a racial slur during an unrelated livestream. Campo Santo justified the takedown by stating they did not want someone with PewDiePie's ideology supporting their games.[14][6] A large number of users issues negative reviews of Firewatch, claiming that Campo Santo were "social justice warriors" or were supporting "censorship". Sean Vanaman of Campo Santo later expressed "regret" over using the takedown notice.[14]

In October 2017, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds was review bombed, primarily by Chinese players, after an advert for a VPN service was shown in game. As the Internet in China is highly regulated, VPN servers have been used by some players to bypass Chinese regulations and play on servers in other regions. The promotion of such VPN products was poorly received because players believed the developer Bluehole should introduce servers local to the region instead of encouraging Chinese players to pay for VPNs. The review bomb may also be tied to the fact that the product, which is not free-to-play, included advertising support, which has yet to occur for the game in any other region worldwide.[15] Kerbal Space Program was similarly review bombed by Chinese players after the developers Squad changed a line of Chinese text on one of the game's assets inspired by a quotation from Chairman Mao Zedong. Due to variations of interpretation of the Chinese saying, this line was perceived as sexist by some players. The replacement line lacked such confusion but also distorted the original meaning, leading those upset with the change to respond with negative reviews.[6][16]

Star Wars: Battlefront II was review-bombed on Metacritic upon its launch in November 2017 in response to the design of the game's microtransactions and loot boxes.[17][18] Many saw the game as being pay-to-win during its pre-release beta trials as the unlocking of new content and characters significantly favoured those who paid for them with real money.[19][20] In response to the backlash, Electronic Arts altered the progression and economic system to make it fairer to players, and the day before release, disabled the microtransactions entirely, stating that they would be re-introduced at a later date.[21][22] In March 2018, developer DICE announced an overhaul for the system, stating that all content would be purely cosmetic, will not affect gameplay, and would only be purchasable through in-game currency. The changes were released across March and April 2018.[23]

2018

The Creative Assembly's Total War: Rome II, initially released in 2013, had been patched in early 2018 to include the potential for women generals to emerge from the game's mechanics. When an image of the game showing one player's armies all led by female generals, users on Steam complained about the historical accuracy. A female community content manager stated the Creative Assembly's stance, that the game was meant to be "historically authentic, not historically accurate", but a portion of these users began to review bomb the title on Steam, believing that the content manager was pushing a personal agenda. Player-created mods that allowed players to control the probability of women generals appearing became popular on Steam.[24]

The launch of the Epic Games Store—a competing storefront to Steam—in December 2018, has been the focal point of a number of review bombs, as Epic has secured time-limited exclusive sales for new games in series that have traditionally been on Steam, with those leaving reviews on the older games on Steam upset at this exclusivity. This includes Metro Exodus, the third game in the Metro series, and Borderlands 3 from the Borderlands series. As the Epic Games Store interface has purposely omitted user reviews, these users have turned to the review pages on Steam for related products (such as Borderlands 2) to review bomb the game.[25][26]

2019

The game Devotion by the Taiwanese studio Red Candle Games was review bombed by Chinese players after they discovered an in-game poster that referenced the meme of Chinese Communist Party general secretary Xi Jinping censoring the character Winnie the Pooh. While Red Candle stated the poster was not meant to be in the final game and took it out on the next immediate patch, the game was still hit with negative user reviews, forcing Red Candle to terminate their publishing deals and pull the game from distribution.[27]

Nintendo's Fire Emblem: Three Houses and Astral Chain were both review bombed on Metacritic shortly after their launches in July and August respectively for being exclusive to the Nintendo Switch, presumably by users of other platforms who were not aware that the critically acclaimed titles were owned by Nintendo.[28] These reviews were removed by Metacritic in early September, restoring the games' user scores to their original "generally favorable" and "universal acclaim" scores of 8.7 and 9.0 respectively.[29]

Gears 5 was review bombed on Steam primarily by players from China after the game was pulled from sale in that region by its developer, The Coalition. While the reason for the game's removal was not officially stated, it may have been pulled by order of the Chinese government due to the inclusion of LGBT+ Pride flags that players can use as decals.[30][31]

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare was review bombed on Metacritic in October 2019 by users who were angered at the game's depiction of the Russian military. In particular, the campaign's portrayal of an area attacked by Russian forces dubbed "the highway of death" drew outrage from its apparent similarities to the real-life Highway of Death that suffered devastation as a result of an attack led by American forces during the Gulf War.[32][33][34]

Death Stranding was review bombed on Metacritic upon its launch in November 2019, receiving over 15,000 user reviews half a month after release and bringing the overall user score to around 5.5/10. Publications noted that the user score bombings were both positive and negative, although found there were more of the latter. The review bombing was deduced to have stemmed from players who were disappointed with the game, which had been widely anticipated but released to "divisive" reviews by critics, as well as PlayStation users who were upset that the game would be ported to PC a year later in 2020.[35][36] In early December 2019, Metacritic removed over 6000 user reviews categorized as negative, increasing the user score to a higher rating of 7.4/10.[37][38]

Pokémon Sword and Shield was review bombed on Metacritic upon release in November 2019, following complaints from fans about the exclusion of Pokémon from previous games in the series, as well as quality concerns brought about by apparent evidence that Game Freak had lied about some aspects of the game's development.[39] The bombing brought the user scores for Sword and Shield down to 4.6 and 4.4 respectively.[40]

2020

Warcraft III: Reforged, a remaster of 2002's Warcraft III: Reign of Chaos, was review bombed on Metacritic upon release in January 2020, reaching a low score of 0.5/10 several days later based on over 14,000 reviews, making it the lowest-ranked game on the site by user score. The game itself received mixed reviews from critics with a Metacritic aggregate score of 60 out of 100 as of February 2020. These reviews cited the poor quality of the remastered version, lacking some of the features that Blizzard had previously said would be in the game such as improved cutscenes and user interface, and that it felt like a half-finished product.[41] However, the review bomb was focused on additional issues beyond the game's quality. The game was released as a mandatory update to the original Warcraft III: Reign of Chaos due to it using Reforged's client, which prevented players from reverting to play the original Warcraft III, even if they had not purchased the remastered version. Additionally, those players criticized the terms of use policy that gave Blizzard ownership over all user-created content made in the remaster.[42][43][44]

Animal Crossing: New Horizons was review bombed on Metacritic upon release in March 2020, with its lowest score reaching 5.0. Users were largely frustrated by the limitations of the game's local co-op and multiplayer progression.[45]

Doom Eternal had shipped for personal computer versions without a digital rights management (DRM) package, though this appeared to be an oversight based on how it was packaged and reported in packaging materials;[46] a secondary Denuvo Anti-Cheat solution was added in by a patch in May 2020. This led to a review bomb from users, due to the requirement of Ring 0 (also known as kernel mode) access to the computer system and the potential for security vulnerabilities.[47]

The Last of Us Part II was review-bombed on Metacritic upon release in June 2020, with a low score of 3.5 based on almost 30,000 reviews within two days, despite the game receiving "universal acclaim" from critics. Publications attributed the negative reactions to initially stemming from leaks of the game's plot in April 2020, which had caused backlash from fans of the original game. User reviews were negative towards the story and characters, additionally citing the inclusion of "social justice warrior" content, and monotonous gameplay.[48][49] Online harassment and death threats were also directed at certain members of the game's cast and development team.[50][51]

Films, television and videos

Theatrical films have also come under review bombing, typically due to perceived social issues related to the cast and crew and not due to any aspect of the film itself. This extends not only to user review scores on sites like Rotten Tomatoes but to the film's promotional trailers on YouTube.

The 2014 Indian film Gunday suffered from review bombing by Bangladeshis on IMDb due to a historical inaccuracy regarding the creation of Bangladesh in the opening narration of the film. At the time of its release it was the lowest-rated film on IMDb, with a 1.4/10 rating based on more than 44,000 votes, out of which 91 percent gave it just one star.[52]

The 2016 Ghostbusters film was met with user backlash on its announcement of having an all-female starring cast (unlike previous films that had a mixed cast). The 2019 Marvel Studios film Captain Marvel also faced drastically lower review scores at release (with over 50,000 mostly negative reviews within several hours of its release), as some took offense to leading actress Brie Larson's perceived activism.[53][54][55]

The 2016 historical drama The Promise about the Armenian Genocide was review bombed on IMDb prior to its release. Commentators assessed that these were mostly votes by people who could not possibly have seen the film, and that the one-star voting was part of an orchestrated campaign by Armenian Genocide deniers to downrate the film, which had then initiated an Armenian response to rate the film highly.[56][57]

The second film in the Star Wars sequel trilogy, The Last Jedi, was met with a flood of negative audience reviews on Rotten Tomatoes, in contrast to sites like CinemaScore which polled audiences in person who gave the film a positive grade of "A". Publications had suspicions about the authenticity of the audience scores;[58][59] Polygon wrote how it was difficult to discern how many were genuine reviews and how many were bots or organized attacks, finding that many criticized the film's inclusion of "SJW" concepts or for its racial diversity and female figures.[60]

Some television series have also been review bombed. Batwoman was review bombed for portraying the title character as a lesbian.[61] HBO's Watchmen, based on the graphic novel of the same name, was review bombed by fans of the comic that felt the series disrespected the character of Rorschach, who they felt was meant to be the hero instead of a right-wing figure as illustrated by the original graphic novel and throughout the show, although The Mary Sue noted that the graphic novel had portrayed his character as such.[62][63]

YouTube's voting system has also been used for review bombing, where dissatisfaction over a creator or a video's content may attract campaigns to "dislike" a video en masse, with a goal for them to be among the most-disliked videos on the service. In December 2018, YouTube Rewind 2018 overtook Justin Bieber's "Baby" music video as the most disliked video on YouTube; the video was universally panned and faced criticism for its exclusion of various top personalities on the service, as well as other factors relating to controversies affecting creators.[64]

Apps

The Google Play Store and Apple App Store has the ability for users to leave reviews, this feature can be abused to the max, if the app has enough bad reviews, the app will be taken down, however, this is not true as just making app reviews won't do anything.

On April 8, 2020, Google Classroom's app on the App Store got review bombed in protest for the app to be taken down because some students do not want to work during the COVID-19 Pandemic. [65]

On July 9, 2020, the app for Donald J. Trump for the App Store got review bombed due to Trump threatening to ban TikTok. [66]

Businesses

Websites offering user reviews of businesses and other establishments, such as TripAdvisor and Yelp, can also be subject to review bombing in relation to controversies surrounding their proprietors. A notable example included an Elizabeth, New Jersey restaurant owned by the family of the 2016 New York and New Jersey bombings suspect (with many reviews jokingly referring to its chicken as being "'the bomb"). Yelp intervened by removing reviews that were not based on first-hand experience with the restaurant.[67][68][69][70]

Effects

In some cases, storefronts and aggregates have intervened to stop review bombs and delete the negative reviews.[1] In February 2019, Rotten Tomatoes announced that it would no longer accept user reviews for a film until after its official release.[53]

Valve added review histograms to Steam user review scores to show how these change over time; according to Valve's Alden Kroll, this can help a potential purchaser of a game recognize a short term review bomb that is not indicative of the game itself, compared to a game that has a long tail of bad reviews. Kroll said they did not want to silence the ability of users to leave reviews but recognized they needed to highlight phenomena like review bombs to aid consumers.[71] In March 2019, Valve stated that it would employ a new system to detect spikes of negative "off-topic" reviews on games: if it is determined that they were the result of a review bomb campaign, the time period will be flagged, and all reviews made during that period (whether negative or positive) will be excluded them from the user rating displayed for a game.[72] This system was first publicly triggered upon the Borderlands 3 review bombing in April 2019.[73] Similarly, Valve stepped in to stop negative reviews of Rocket League, following the May 2019 announcement that its developer Psyonix had been acquired by Epic Games (leading to uncertainty over whether it would eventually become exclusive to Epic Games Store).[74] Valve said that they had to intervene 44 times in 2019 to stop review bombing on Steam.[2]

In 2018, Rotten Tomatoes attempted to broaden and diversify its list of approved critics, who were largely white and male, in an attempt to improve its rating experience. By March 2019, the site no longer accepted audience reviews of a film until after its premiere, as part of an effort to counter pre-release review bombing.[53] Further, it would only accept reviews from persons that have been confirmed to have seen the movie, as verified through theater chains like Regal Cinemas, Cinemark, and AMC Theatres, or through online ticket sales though Fandango.[75][76][77]

Metacritic had not take any direct stance until mid-2020 to address review bombing, allowing its systems to be misused. In February 2020, Kunai by TurtleBlaze was review bombed on Metacritic, knocking its user rating from 8.1 to 1.7 within a day. The studio, having no idea what they had done to trigger this, found that the review bomb was initiated by a single user, using numerous freshly created email addresses to register accounts at Metacritic as to bring down the user rating, all to demonstrate that a single person could have this effect. As Metacritic had no policy to handle or identify review bombing, this scoring impacted the game.[78] Following the review bombing of The Last of Us II in July 2020, Metacritic added a 36-hour delay for user reviews to be added for a newly released game, with users given the message "Please spend some time playing the game" during this period. This was intended to prevent users from adding reviews without having completed a game and minimize the number of reviews that may be added as a result of a review bomb.[79]

Reverse review bomb

Infrequently, a review bomb may be used to praise the game, developers or publishers for other actions that players see as beneficial. One such case was for Assassin's Creed Unity, in the week following the Notre-Dame de Paris fire in April 2019. Ubisoft had made Unity free via its storefront UPlay, as the game included a recreation of the Notre Dame Cathedral.[80] Steam users left numerous positive reviews for the game in the days that followed, with many thanking the developers for the free game and others expressing appreciation for the cathedral's recreation.[81] Unity, which was released in 2014, had received mixed reviews prior to this event due to bugs and technical problems with the game's launch.[82] While such an event had triggered Valve's safeguards against review bombs, they opted to not enforce it since the effect was meant to be positive.[83][84]

The effects of a review bomb may also backfire on its intended purpose, as the added attention may lead to positive actions by other users to counter it. For example, AI: The Somnium Files had been reviewed bombed at Metacritic in February 2020, but it was later revealed this was through the actions of one person who purportedly wanted to show the flaws in Metacritic that allowed them to single-handedly affect the rating, though this same person later revealed they performed this review bomb as they were upset at how a character in the game was handled. Before the cause of the review bomb was known, the game directors reached out to fans on social media asking for help, who collectively provided numerous positive reviews. When the person's actions had been discovered by Metacritic, the negative reviews they had left were removed from the site, and as a result of all the additional positive reviews, left the game temporarily as the top-rated Nintendo Switch title while further drawing attention to the game as a result of the failed review bomb attempt.[85] Fallout 76 had been originally released to negative reviews by both critics and players on its initial release, but its developers Bethesda Softworks put effort to improve the game over the following year. By the time the game released to Steam in April 2020, many considered the game to have been reinvented for the better in a manner similar to Final Fantasy XIV: A Realm Reborn and No Man's Sky. However, players still upset over several faults with the game's launch attempted to review bomb the game on Steam at this point. The game's community worked to counter this review bomb by posting positive experiences and reviews of the game at Steam and at other community sites to prove the game had been much improved upon the initial release.[86][87]

gollark: Right. Call the President of Science. We need to warn them!
gollark: <@261243340752814085> PotatOS.
gollark: * GNU/Heretic, or GNU *plus* Heretic.
gollark: <@319753218592866315> = heretic.
gollark: Besides, it's actually quite good.

References
  1. Grayson, Nathan (19 April 2015). "Steam 'Review Bombing' Is A Problem". Steamed. Archived from the original on 10 August 2017. Retrieved 10 August 2017.
  2. Hall, Charlie (February 6, 2020). "Valve intervened in 44 'review bomb' incidents on Steam last year". Polygon. Retrieved February 19, 2020.
  3. Kuchera, Ben (October 4, 2017). "The anatomy of a review bombing campaign". Polygon. Archived from the original on October 5, 2017. Retrieved October 4, 2017.
  4. Klepek, Patrick (September 19, 2017). "Valve's "Solution" to Review Bombing Ignores Steam's Longstanding Problems". Vice. Archived from the original on September 19, 2017. Retrieved September 19, 2017.
  5. "Steam review bombing is working, and Chinese players are a powerful new voice". pcgamer. 28 June 2017. Archived from the original on 10 August 2017. Retrieved 10 August 2017.
  6. McKeand, Kirk (October 12, 2017). "A brief history of how Steam review bombing damages developers". PCGamesN. Archived from the original on October 12, 2017. Retrieved October 12, 2017.
  7. Kuchera, Ben (2008-09-08). "Gamers fight back against lackluster Spore gameplay, bad DRM". Ars Technica. Retrieved 2019-11-18.
  8. "Metacritic Brings Down The Hammer On "Review Bombers"". The Escapist. 13 September 2011. Archived from the original on 10 August 2017. Retrieved 10 August 2017.
  9. Schreier, Jason (6 March 2012). "Metacritic Says It Has Removed Rule-Violating Mass Effect 3 User Reviews". Kotaku. Archived from the original on 10 August 2017. Retrieved 10 August 2017.
  10. Hernandez, Patricia (16 April 2015). "Popular YouTuber Says He Won't Cover Game After Twitter Spat". Kotaku. Archived from the original on 10 August 2017. Retrieved 10 August 2017.
  11. "OpenIV petition passes 50,000 signatures as GTA 5 hits 'mixed' Steam review rating [Updated]". pcgamer. 19 June 2017. Archived from the original on 10 August 2017. Retrieved 10 August 2017.
  12. McWhertor, Michael (August 28, 2017). "Steam users are attacking Dota 2 because there's no more Half-Life". Polygon. Archived from the original on August 28, 2017. Retrieved August 28, 2017.
  13. Yin-Poole, Wesley (2017-08-30). "Steam users review-bomb Sonic Mania over unexpected DRM". Eurogamer. Archived from the original on 2017-08-30. Retrieved 2017-08-30.
  14. Chalk, Andy (September 12, 2017). "Firewatch is getting review-bombed on Steam". PC Gamer. Archived from the original on September 13, 2017. Retrieved September 13, 2017.
  15. Kim, Matt (October 2, 2017). "PUBG Review Bombed on Steam Due to In-game ads Found in China". US Gamer. Archived from the original on October 3, 2017. Retrieved October 2, 2017.
  16. Grayson, Nathan (October 13, 2017). "Kerbal Space Program Review Bombed Over Controversial Chinese Gender Translation". Kotaku. Archived from the original on February 25, 2019. Retrieved February 25, 2019.
  17. Grill, Scott. "'Star Wars Battlefront 2' Community Wins, DICE Turns Off Microtransactions After Massive Backlash". Inquisitr. Retrieved 26 November 2019.
  18. Tamburro, Paul (14 November 2017). "Star Wars Battlefront 2 Has Been Review Bombed Over "Pay to Win" Controversy". Game Revolution. Retrieved 26 November 2019.
  19. Gach, Ethan. "Unlocking Heroes In Star Wars Battlefront II Could Take A Long Time [Update]". Kotaku. Retrieved 26 November 2019.
  20. Good, Owen (11 November 2017). "Star Wars Battlefront 2 heroes come at a substantial cost". Polygon. Retrieved 26 November 2019.
  21. Arts, Electronic (November 13, 2017). "Change will be a Constant in Star Wars Battlefront II". ea.com. Retrieved November 26, 2019.
  22. Kim, Matt (November 13, 2017). "EA Lowers the Cost of Unlocking Star Wars Battlefront 2 Heroes by 75 Percent". Retrieved November 26, 2019.
  23. "Revamped Progression is Coming Soon". March 16, 2018. Retrieved November 26, 2019.
  24. Yin-Poole, Wesley (September 25, 2018). "Steam users review bomb Total War: Rome 2 over female characters". Eurogamer. Archived from the original on September 25, 2018. Retrieved September 25, 2018.
  25. Jones, Ali (January 30, 2019). "Metro games are getting review-bombed on Steam". PCGamesN. Archived from the original on January 30, 2019. Retrieved January 30, 2019.
  26. Bailey, Dustin (April 3, 2019). "Old Borderlands games are getting review bombed because of the Epic store". PCGamesN. Retrieved April 3, 2019.
  27. Yin-Poole, Wesley (February 25, 2019). "Devotion developer calls for calm as fallout from China Winnie the Pooh poster goes from bad to worse". Eurogamer. Archived from the original on February 26, 2019. Retrieved February 25, 2019.
  28. Garrett, Eric. "Astral Chain Review Bombed For Being a Nintendo Switch Exclusive". ComicBook.com. Retrieved September 1, 2019.
  29. "Metacritic Deletes Astral Chain's Review Bombed Scores". NintendoSoup. 2019-09-04. Retrieved 2019-11-07.
  30. Jones, Ali (September 10, 2019). "Gears 5 was pulled from sale in China, so fans are review-bombing it". PCGamesN. Retrieved September 10, 2019.
  31. "Gears 5 Review Bomb Strikes Due To Delay In Chinese Availability". TechRaptor. Retrieved 2019-11-07.
  32. Wood, Austin. "Call of Duty: Modern Warfare is getting review bombed for rewriting a war crime". GamesRadar+. Retrieved 21 November 2019.
  33. Thier, Dave. "'Call Of Duty: Modern Warfare' Is Getting Review-Bombed On Metacritic, But Not For The Usual Reasons". Forbes. Retrieved 21 November 2019.
  34. Hall, Charlie (28 October 2019). "Call of Duty: Modern Warfare review bombed over Russian portrayal". Polygon. Retrieved 21 November 2019.
  35. Ramsey, Robert (8 November 2019). "Of Course Death Stranding Is Getting Review Bombed on Metacritic". Push Square. Retrieved 25 November 2019.
  36. Hunter, Miche. "Death Stranding Review Bombing Hits Metacritic". Segment Next. Retrieved 25 November 2019.
  37. Ramsey, Robert (7 December 2019). "Death Stranding User Score Spikes as Metacritic Removes Over 6000 Negative Ratings". Push Square. Retrieved 9 December 2019.
  38. Adams, Robert. "Over 6,000 negative Death Stranding reviews removed by Metacritic". Game Revolution. Retrieved 9 December 2019.
  39. "'Game Freak Lied' isn't entirely about Pokémon Sword and Shield"". Polygon. 14 November 2019.
  40. Kim, Allen and Shannon Liao (2019-11-16). "Why fans aren't happy with Pokémon Sword and Shield developer Game Freak". CNN. Retrieved 2019-11-18.
  41. "Warcraft III: Reforged for PC Reviews". Metacritic. CBS Interactive. Retrieved February 3, 2020.
  42. Robinson, Andy (1 February 2020). "Warcraft 3: Reforged is now the worst user scored game ever on Metacritic". VideoGamesChronicle. Retrieved 2020-02-03.
  43. Blake, Vikki. "Warcraft 3: Reforged has the worst user score on Metacritic". GamesRadar+. Retrieved 3 February 2020.
  44. Macgregor, Jody (3 February 2020). "Warcraft 3 Reforged has the lowest user score for a game on Metacritic". PC Gamer. Retrieved 3 February 2020.
  45. https://www.nintendolife.com/news/2020/03/angry_players_are_starting_to_review-bomb_animal_crossing_new_horizons
  46. Orland, Kyle (March 20, 2020). "Bethesda apparently broke its own Denuvo protection for Doom Eternal". Retrieved May 16, 2020.
  47. Hancock, Patrick (May 16, 2020). "Doom Eternal adds Denuvo on PC, immediately gets review bombed". Destructoid. Retrieved May 16, 2020.
  48. Nunneley, Stephany (June 19, 2020). "The Last of Us: Part 2 has been review bombed on Metacritic". VG247. Retrieved June 19, 2020.
  49. Croft, Liam. "The Last of Us 2 Review Bombing Continues, Online Discourse Increasingly Ugly". Push Square. Retrieved 20 June 2020.
  50. Barker, Sammy. "Industry Rallies Around The Last of Us 2 Voice Actor After Hate Messages Are Revealed". Push Square. Retrieved 4 July 2020.
  51. Gach, Ethan. "Last Of Us 2 Developer Condemns Online Harassment Of People Who Worked On The Game". Kotaku. Retrieved 6 July 2020.
  52. Goldenberg, David (1 May 2014). "The Story Behind the Worst Movie on IMDb". FiveThirtyEight. Archived from the original on 11 April 2017. Retrieved 30 January 2020.
  53. Polo, Susana (2019-02-26). "Rotten Tomatoes will no longer allow audiences to review movies before release". Polygon. Archived from the original on 2019-02-26. Retrieved 2019-02-26.
  54. "Rotten Tomatoes takes on trolls by removing 'want to see' scores". Engadget. Archived from the original on 2019-02-26. Retrieved 2019-02-26.
  55. "'Captain Marvel' Sandbagged on Rotten Tomatoes Within a Few Hours of Opening". The Hollywood Reporter. Retrieved 2019-03-08.
  56. "Armenian Genocide film gets 86,704 IMDb ratings off three screenings". The Independent. 2016-10-25. Retrieved 2019-11-14.
  57. Flows, Capital. "Genocide Denial Goes Viral: 'The Promise' And The IMDB". Forbes. Retrieved 2019-11-14.
  58. Rodriguez, Ashley (December 19, 2017). "A rabid Star Wars fan may have rigged the Rotten Tomatoes score for 'The Last Jedi'". Quartz. Archived from the original on January 2, 2018. Retrieved November 21, 2019.
  59. Booth, Kaitlyn (December 17, 2017). "Facebook User Claims to Have Manipulated the Rotten Tomatoes Audience Score for Star Wars: The Last Jedi". BleedingCool.com. Archived from the original on December 23, 2017. Retrieved November 21, 2019.
  60. Alexander, Julia (2017-12-18). "Star Wars: The Last Jedi is being review-bombed on Rotten Tomatoes (update)". Polygon. Retrieved 2019-11-13.
  61. Mithaiwala, Mansoor (October 13, 2019). "Batwoman Has Been Review Bombed By Audiences - Here's Why". Screen Rant. Retrieved November 4, 2019.
  62. Fallen, Kevin (October 25, 2019). "Comics Fanboys Are Pissed About HBO's 'Watchmen': It's 'Woke' Propaganda!". The Daily Beast. Retrieved November 4, 2019.
  63. Bukszpan, Daniel (October 26, 2019). "HBO's 'Watchmen' is getting 'review bombed,' but that won't scare off any viewers". CNBC. Retrieved November 4, 2019.
  64. Alexander, Julia (2018-12-13). "YouTube Rewind 2018 is officially the most disliked video on YouTube". The Verge. Retrieved 2019-03-25.
  65. Meisenzahl, Mary (April 15, 2020). "Students bored of homeschooling spam Google Classroom app with one-star reviews thanks to a TikTok meme". Business Insider. Retrieved July 31, 2020.
  66. Banjo, Shelly (July 10, 2020). "TikTok Teens Are 'Going to War' Against the Trump Campaign After Republicans Call to Ban the App". Time. Retrieved July 31, 2020.
  67. "What Happens When Yelp Restaurant Reviews Turn Political?". NPR.org. Retrieved 2019-03-25.
  68. "Yelp reviewers drag chicken restaurant owned by NYC bombing suspect's family". mic.com. Retrieved 2019-03-25.
  69. Kinstler, Linda (2018-08-17). "How TripAdvisor changed travel". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2019-03-25.
  70. "Yelp vs Google: How they deal with fake reviews". Search Engine Land. 2018-11-01. Retrieved 2019-11-13.
  71. Sinclair, Brendan (September 19, 2017). "Steam adds histograms to address review bombing". GamesIndustry.biz. Archived from the original on September 19, 2017. Retrieved September 19, 2017.
  72. Liptak, Andrew (2019-03-15). "Valve says it will investigate Steam review bombing campaigns and hide bad-faith scores". The Verge. Retrieved 2019-03-25.
  73. Orland, Kyle (April 5, 2019). "Borderlands review bomb triggers Steam's "off topic" fix". Ars Technica. Retrieved April 6, 2019.
  74. Watts, Steve (May 3, 2019). "Rocket League Review Bombed After Epic Acquisition Announced; Steam Steps In". GameSpot. Retrieved May 3, 2019.
  75. Sims, David (March 4, 2019). "A Change for Rotten Tomatoes Ahead of 'Captain Marvel'". The Atlantic.
  76. Alexander, Julia (May 23, 2019). "Rotten Tomatoes is changing audience review capabilities to tackle review bombing". The Verge. Retrieved May 23, 2019.
  77. "We're introducing Verified Ratings and Reviews to Help You Make Your Viewing Decisions". Retrieved 2019-11-13.
  78. de Jager, Benjamin (February 19, 2020). "Our indie game KUNAI got review bombed to a 1.7". Gamasutra. Retrieved February 21, 2020.
  79. Fisher, Christine (July 17, 2020). "Metacritic changes its user review policy to combat score bombing". Engadget. Retrieved July 17, 2020.
  80. Horti, Samual (April 20, 2019). "Assassin's Creed Unity gets reverse-review bombed following Ubisoft's Notre Dame support". PC Gamer. Retrieved April 20, 2019.
  81. Orland, Kyle (2019-04-19). "Reverse review bomb? AC: Unity draws praise for Notre Dame preservation". Ars Technica. Retrieved 2019-11-18.
  82. Khan, Imran. "Assassin's Creed Unity Is Getting Reverse-Review Bombed With Positivity". Game Informer. Retrieved 2019-11-18.
  83. Good, Owen (May 22, 2019). "'Positive review bomb' of Assassin's Creed Unity posed a quandary to Steam". Polygon. Retrieved May 22, 2019.
  84. "Steam :: Steam Blog :: Positive "Review Bombs"". steamcommunity.com. 2019-05-21. Retrieved 2019-11-13.
  85. Denzer, TJ (February 13, 2020). "AI: Somnium Files review bomb backfires, becomes top user-reviewed Switch game". Shacknews. Retrieved February 19, 2020.
  86. Marshall, Cass (April 16, 2020). "Fallout 76 fans are ignoring review bombs, laying out the welcome mat". Polygon. Retrieved April 17, 2020.
  87. Beckhelling, Imogen (April 16, 2020). "Steam users tried to review bomb Fallout 76, but some of its fans are having none of it". Rock Paper Shotgun. Retrieved April 17, 2020.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.