Regular category

In category theory, a regular category is a category with finite limits and coequalizers of a pair of morphisms called kernel pairs, satisfying certain exactness conditions. In that way, regular categories recapture many properties of abelian categories, like the existence of images, without requiring additivity. At the same time, regular categories provide a foundation for the study of a fragment of first-order logic, known as regular logic.

Definition

A category C is called regular if it satisfies the following three properties:[1]

  • C is finitely complete.
  • If f : X  Y is a morphism in C, and



is a pullback, then the coequalizer of p0, p1 exists. The pair (p0, p1) is called the kernel pair of f. Being a pullback, the kernel pair is unique up to a unique isomorphism.
  • If f : X  Y is a morphism in C, and



is a pullback, and if f is a regular epimorphism, then g is a regular epimorphism as well. A regular epimorphism is an epimorphism that appears as a coequalizer of some pair of morphisms.

Examples

Examples of regular categories include:

The following categories are not regular:

Epi-mono factorization

In a regular category, the regular-epimorphisms and the monomorphisms form a factorization system. Every morphism f:X→Y can be factorized into a regular epimorphism e:X→E followed by a monomorphism m:E→Y, so that f=me. The factorization is unique in the sense that if e':X→E' is another regular epimorphism and m':E'→Y is another monomorphism such that f=m'e', then there exists an isomorphism h:E→E' such that he=e' and m'h=m. The monomorphism m is called the image of f.

Exact sequences and regular functors

In a regular category, a diagram of the form is said to be an exact sequence if it is both a coequalizer and a kernel pair. The terminology is a generalization of exact sequences in homological algebra: in an abelian category, a diagram

is exact in this sense if and only if is a short exact sequence in the usual sense.

A functor between regular categories is called regular, if it preserves finite limits and coequalizers of kernel pairs. A functor is regular if and only if it preserves finite limits and exact sequences. For this reason, regular functors are sometimes called exact functors. Functors that preserve finite limits are often said to be left exact.

Regular logic and regular categories

Regular logic is the fragment of first-order logic that can express statements of the form


,


where and are regular formulae i.e. formulae built up from atomic formulae, the truth constant, binary meets (conjunction) and existential quantification. Such formulae can be interpreted in a regular category, and the interpretation is a model of a sequent , if the interpretation of factors through the interpretation of .[2] This gives for each theory (set of sequents) T and for each regular category C a category Mod(T,C) of models of T in C. This construction gives a functor Mod(T,-):RegCatCat from the category RegCat of small regular categories and regular functors to small categories. It is an important result that for each theory T there is a regular category R(T), such that for each regular category C there is an equivalence


,

which is natural in C. Here, R(T) is called the classifying category of the regular theory T. Up to equivalence any small regular category arises in this way as the classifying category of some regular theory.[2]

Exact (effective) categories

The theory of equivalence relations is a regular theory. An equivalence relation on an object of a regular category is a monomorphism into that satisfies the interpretations of the conditions for reflexivity, symmetry and transitivity.

Every kernel pair defines an equivalence relation . Conversely, an equivalence relation is said to be effective if it arises as a kernel pair.[3] An equivalence relation is effective if and only if it has a coequalizer and it is the kernel pair of this.

A regular category is said to be exact, or exact in the sense of Barr, or effective regular, if every equivalence relation is effective.[4] (Note that the term "exact category" is also used differently, for the exact categories in the sense of Quillen.)

Examples of exact categories

  • The category of sets is exact in this sense, and so is any (elementary) topos. Every equivalence relation has a coequalizer, which is found by taking equivalence classes.
  • Every abelian category is exact.
  • Every category that is monadic over the category of sets is exact.
  • The category of Stone spaces is regular, but not exact.
gollark: The law enforcement turtle is a thing, allegedly.
gollark: **The most gollarious response**: - this post made by posting unrelated code gang.<|endoftext|>Also, I think I have a better reason for "definitely" to talk about the "retro".<|endoftext|>I'd like to be banned, except to be honest Bad Guy™ is really annoying.<|endoftext|>That's actually... bad.<|endoftext|>Well, I think it's a really stupid rule.<|endoftext|>I mean, it's a good thing now.<|endoftext|>... no?<|endoftext|>You're saying that the rules don't apply.<|endoftext|>The law enforcement turtle is a thing.<|endoftext|>I think it'd be like the rules actually doing basically nothing.<|endoftext|>I'm not actually a fan of the rules if it's not edited, but it's not like that would be a reasonable heuristic.<|endoftext|>You can say "I'm exempt"?<|endoftext|>Well, you can, as he is somewhat tyrannical.<|endoftext|>They could obviously do that anyway,
gollark: I can't get it to say much else.
gollark: mgollark says:> The most gollarious response: Ǣ̡͐̍a̐̂̐c̢͐̊r͙͌ ͎ ̸̃͡ ̌ ͣ́̆ ́ ̴̤e͌̈́ ̐ť ͌ ͔̓̒c̡̯ͣe͐̌ ͐̋n̆̂͊ḙ̉̾ď̄o̒̂̂d̤͐̌
gollark: I forgot.

See also

References

  1. Pedicchio & Tholen (2004) p.177
  2. Carsten Butz (1998), Regular Categories and Regular Logic, BRICS Lectures Series LS-98-2, (1998).
  3. Pedicchio & Tholen (2004) p.169
  4. Pedicchio & Tholen (2004) p.179
  • Michael Barr, Pierre A. Grillet, Donovan H. van Osdol. Exact Categories and Categories of Sheaves, Springer, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 236. 1971.
  • Francis Borceux, Handbook of Categorical Algebra 2, Cambridge University Press, (1994).
  • Stephen Lack, A note on the exact completion of a regular category, and its infinitary generalizations". Theory and Applications of Categories, Vol.5, No.3, (1999).
  • Jaap van Oosten (1995), Basic Category Theory, BRICS Lectures Series LS-95-1, (1995).
  • Pedicchio, Maria Cristina; Tholen, Walter, eds. (2004). Categorical foundations. Special topics in order, topology, algebra, and sheaf theory. Encyclopedia of Mathematics and Its Applications. 97. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-83414-7. Zbl 1034.18001.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.