Reader Rabbit's Interactive Reading Journey 2

Reader Rabbit's Interactive Reading Journey 2 is a 1994 video game released on the Windows and Macintosh systems and designed for ages 5 till 8. It is the seventh game in the Reader Rabbit franchise and a sequel to Reader Rabbit's Interactive Reading Journey. It was re-released in 1997 as "Reader Rabbit's Interactive Reading Journey For Grades 1-2", followed by another released in 1998 titled "Reader Rabbit's Reading Ages 6–9" and a personalized version in 1999.

Reader Rabbit's Interactive Reading Journey 2
Cover art
Developer(s)The Learning Company
Publisher(s)The Learning Company
Platform(s)Windows, Macintosh
Release1994 (Original)
1997 (Re-release)
1998 (Ages 6-9)
1999 (Personalized)
Genre(s)Adventure, Edutainment
Mode(s)Single-player

Educational Goals

The game reinforces the reading skills of older children to allow for confidence and language skills. Although deemed too difficult for young users by an Adult Juror, being able to record voice narration is good reading practice.[1] Multilevel activities include phonics, initial letter blends and word recognition. The game also includes 30 different storybooks during the gameplay to widen reading comprehension, reasoning and vocabulary.[2]

Reception
Reception
Awards
PublicationAward
SuperKidsSoftware Award for Best Reading Software[3]
National Educational Media NetworkSilver Apple[3]
NewsweekEditor's Choice Award 1997[4]
Parent's ChoiceGold Award[4]

In 1996 the game won the SuperKids Software Award for Best Reading Software. Then in 1997, it won some more awards including the National Educational Media Network Silver Apple,[3] the Newsweek Editor's Choice and the Parent's Choice Gold Award.[4]

gollark: Presumably, it harvests login tokens from Discord if you run it.
gollark: Clearly the best way to return data would be the osmarks.net™ DNS to IRC bridge™.
gollark: Fascinating.
gollark: It is clearly becoming scarily accurate. I did not add the ™ symbols.
gollark: > , in practice, though, it could probably be a "good idea" thing, although this is actually quite bad.<|endoftext|>I don't care much about the details, but I don't think it's a valid language.<|endoftext|>I mean, yes, but it would be horrible as it would be useful if you use it to write all your code on the internet™, but they probably aren't very good if you can just read the entire WHYJIT™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™™

References
  1. Levy, Ranny (November 1999). The New York Times Guide to the Best Children's Videos. Pocket Books. p. 151. ISBN 0671036696.
  2. Apple Computer (January 1999). Apple Data Sheet: Primary Language Concerns. Apple Inc. p. 1.
  3. "History of The Learning Company Inc. – FundingUniverse".
  4. CD Back Cover art
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.