Ram Nath

Ram Nath (R. Nath, born 9 March 1933) is an Indian historian who specializes in Mughal architecture. He obtained a doctorate from the Agra University, and later taught at the University of Rajasthan. He is regarded as one of India's leading art historians.

Life and career

R. Nath was born on 9 March 1933, grew up in a syncretic environment of Agra. He later recalled that, in his childhood period, Hindus and Muslims lived together in the same neighbourhoods, went to the same schools and participated in each other's festivals.[1]

Nath studied in the St. John's College in Agra and obtained PhD and DLitt from the Agra University. His research covered the Mughal-era monuments such as the Agra Fort, the buildings at Fatehpur Sikri, and the Jama Masjid of Delhi.[2][3]

Nath taught at the Agra College and later at the University of Rajasthan in Jaipur where he was a Reader and Associate Professor in the Department of History and Indian Culture. He also delivered lectures at other institutions including the Heras Institute (St. Xavier's College, Mumbai) and the Harvard University. Specializing in medieval Indian architecture, Nath came to be regarded one of India's leading art historians and an authority on the Mughal architecture.[2][3]

Views

In 1990, in the context of the Ayodhya dispute, the All India Babri Masjid Action Committee (AIBMAC) cited Nath's History of Mughal Architecture to argue that the Islamic Mughal rulers did not destroy a Hindu temple to build the Babri mosque in Ayodhya. When Nath learned about this from an Indian Express newspaper report, he clarified that he actually believed that the mosque had been built over a temple.[4] He explained his position in a booklet titled Architecture & Site of the Baburi Masjid of Ayodhya, stating that a Jami Masjid is always sited in the main bazar of a city where the faithful can congregate conveniently and make purchases in the market afterwards. The Babri Masjid is on the other hand sited on a high mound in the midst of a series of Hindu temples in an exclusively Hindu locality. There would have been no reason to site a mosque at that location unless it was built on top of a demolished temple.[5]

In 2015, when a group of 53 academics criticised the BJP-led Narendra Modi government for fostering an environment of intolerance in the country on behalf of Hindu nationalists, Nath was among the 46 academics who disagreed with them. Nath and his colleagues branded the first group of academics as "leftist", and stated that their letter was politico-ideological rather than intellectual in nature. They asserted that they rejected the nationalist attempts to portray India's paste as glorious golden age, but also condemned the "leftist" historians for promoting contempt of Indian civilisation.[6]

In 2017, when the Uttar Pradesh chief minister and BJP leader Yogi Adityanath reportedly stated that the Mughal-built Taj Mahal was not a part of Indian culture, Nath denounced him for "ignoring the contribution of [the] Mughal rulers to Indian arts, culture and literature".[7] Nath also criticised the BJP leader Sangeet Som's claim that Taj Mahal was built by "traitors": he asserted that the monument's builder Shah Jahan was an Indian emperor,[7] who defended India against foreign invasions, promoted the Indian languages Sanskrit and Hindavi over Arabic, and who liberally patronised Indian poets, musicians, and painters. He further pointed out that the monument was built by Indian artisans, using Indian material and Indian techniques. Nath rejected the claims that Shah Jahan had forcibly acquired the land from Hindu king Jai Singh to build the monument, and that hands of 20,000 artisans involved in its construction were amputated.[8] He also criticised the Hindu chauvinist theory that Taj Mahal was originally a Shiva temple, calling it "absolutely wrong and absurd".[9] He stated that the Hindu nationalist characterisation of the Mughal era as "exploitative, barbaric and a period of incomparable intolerance" was completely wrong.[8]

Works

According to the University of Washington Libraries, R. Nath has authored "65 books, 13 monographs, 190 research-papers and 300 popular articles."[3] The books written by him include the following:

gollark: It's the school holidays, I have not done stuff with it.
gollark: > Frame analysis (also called framing analysis) is a multi-disciplinary social science research method used to analyze how people understand situations and activities. Frame analysis looks at images, stereotypes, metaphors, actors, messages, and more. It examines how important these factors are and how and why they are chosen.This seems unrelated.
gollark: What is a ”frame analysis” and why not use bigger samples?
gollark: That seems unthingy.
gollark: For purposes only.

References
  1. Nath, R. (1991). Architecture & Site of the Baburi Masjid of Ayodhya. Jaipur: The Historical Research Documentation Programme. p. 54.
  2. Nath, R. (1991). Architecture & Site of the Baburi Masjid of Ayodhya. Jaipur: The Historical Research Documentation Programme. back cover.
  3. "R. Nath Mughal Architecture Image Collection". University of Washington Libraries. Retrieved 7 February 2019.
  4. Arvind Lavakare (26 December 2000). "Ayodhya's Original Sinners: Their cowardly retreat from truth". rediff.com.
  5. Nath, R. (1991). Architecture & Site of the Baburi Masjid of Ayodhya. Jaipur: The Historical Research Documentation Programme. pp. 67–68.
  6. "Full text of statement issued by 46 academics against "leftist" historians". The Hindu. 17 November 2015.
  7. "Historian R Nath challenges Uttar Pradesh CM Yogi Adityanath over Taj Mahal". Financial Express. 1 September 2017.
  8. R. V. Smith (8 January 2018). "No one's mistress..." The Hindu.
  9. Mahmood Hasan (17 November 2017). "Will the Taj Mahal face the same fate as Babri Mosque? The Daily Star columnist". The Straits Times.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.