Agrifutures Australia

Agrifutures Australia, formerly the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation is an Australian corporation, originally formed as a statutory corporation in July 1990 under the Primary Industries and Energy Research and Development (PIERD) Act 1989. The former RIRDC was set up by the Australian Government to work with Australian rural industries on the organisation and funding of their research and development needs, in particular for new and emerging industries and for national rural issues.

Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation
Statutory authority overview
FormedJuly 1990 (1990-07)
JurisdictionAustralia
HeadquartersCharles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW
35.061095°S 147.353637°E / -35.061095; 147.353637
Websiteagrifutures.com.au

Aims

The RIRDC mission is for a profitable, dynamic and sustainable rural sector.[1] It is one of 15 Rural Research and Development corporations (RDCs) in Australia.

RIRDC has three portfolio areas: New rural industries, established rural industries and national rural issues.

RIRDC's research helps producers and communities to increase their profitability and to diversify, by identifying opportunities and helping to manage change. RIRDC was involved in early work on developing canola in Australia, which has gone on to become a crop of up to 2.4 million tonnes a year. Research for the tropical fruit industry has seen it expand to more than 400 Australian commercial growers.

RIRDC also provides research and development for established industries. RIRDC R&D has helped improve rice yields by 87% per megalitre while reducing water use by 45%. RIRDC's chicken meat research led to a new live MG vaccine which holds 40% of that global market and has reduced losses in the industry. RIRDC research has developed three new oaten hay varieties – Wintaroo, Brusher and Kangaroo – which are contributing to an export hay market that has grown by 200% over ten years.[2]

gollark: As I said, I suppose you could argue I'm mostly not against it on *principled* grounds, however <:icosidodecahedron:726025762590949426>.
gollark: It's stating *directly relevant* things as fact and then complaining when I disagree with them.
gollark: They just state them as fact. And as I said, I don't believe torture is actually effective at anything but making terrible people happy.
gollark: But the question just states it as fact and has "yes, torture fat person" and "no, no torturing fat person, you are awful and want the entire city to be explodinated".
gollark: I suppose you could argue that I don't believe it as a "matter of principle" thing, but from what I've heard torture is *not* actually a very effective way to get information.

References
  1. RIRDC Annual Report 2007-08
  2. http://www.rirdc.gov.au/aop05-06/contents.htm Archived 16 October 2007 at the Wayback Machine RRDIC Annual Operational Plan 2005-2006
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.