Pussysoul
Pussysoul is the debut studio album from death metal band, Soilent Green. It is the band's first and last album released through Los Angeles based record label Dwell Records. In 2005 Pussysoul was re-mastered and reissued through Dwell Records.
Pussysoul | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Studio album by | ||||
Released | February 14, 1995 | |||
Recorded | 1994 | |||
Genre | Death metal, sludge metal | |||
Length | 47:20 | |||
Label | Dwell Records | |||
Producer | Soilent Green | |||
Soilent Green chronology | ||||
|
Review scores | |
---|---|
Source | Rating |
AllMusic |
Track listing
- "Thirteen Days a Weak" - 4:37
- "Slapfuck" - 3:31
- "Falling from a 65 Story Building" - 3:27
- "Lips as So of Blood" - 4:03
- "The Wrong of Way" - 3:55
- "Needlescrape" - 6:04
- "Zebra Zombies" - 3:04
- "Keep Crawling" - 5:05
- "Twitch of an Eye" - 4:09
- "Golfers Just Love Punishment" - 5:02
- "Love None" - 0:51
- "Branding of Thieves" - 3:28
- "Purple People" - 4:32
Personnel
- Ben Falgoust - vocals
- Brian Patton - guitar
- Tommy Buckley - drums
- Donovan Punch - guitar
- Scott Williams (musician) - bass
gollark: Oh, and also stuff like this (https://archive.is/P6mcL) - there seem to be companies looking at using your information for credit scores and stuff.
gollark: But that is... absolutely not the case.
gollark: I mean, yes, if you already trust everyone to act sensibly and without doing bad stuff, then privacy doesn't matter for those reasons.
gollark: Oh, and as an extension to the third thing, if you already have some sort of vast surveillance apparatus, even if you trust the government of *now*, a worse government could come along and use it later for... totalitarian things.
gollark: For example:- the average person probably does *some* sort of illegal/shameful/bad/whatever stuff, and if some organization has information on that it can use it against people it wants to discredit (basically, information leads to power, so information asymmetry leads to power asymmetry). This can happen if you decide to be an activist or something much later, even- having lots of data on you means you can be manipulated more easily (see, partly, targeted advertising, except that actually seems to mostly be poorly targeted)- having a government be more effective at detecting minor crimes (which reduced privacy could allow for) might *not* actually be a good thing, as some crimes (drug use, I guess?) are kind of stupid and at least somewhat tolerable because they *can't* be entirely enforced practically
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.