Project Catwalk (series 2)

Series 2 of Project Catwalk premiered on 8 January 2007 on Sky One. It was presented by Kelly Osbourne.

Series 2 Challenges

Elimination Chart
Designer12345678910
Wayne WINLOWLOWININWINLOWLOWHIGHWINNER
Monika HIGHLOWLOWWINWININHIGHLOWWINRUNNER-UP
Luke ININHIGHLOWHIGHLOWWINWINLOW3RD PLACE
Giles INININHIGHININHIGHLOWOUT
Shawla ININININLOWINHIGHOUT
Fatz INWINWINLOWINLOWOUT
Luisa INHIGHININLOWOUT
Tyla LOWININLOWOUT
Henry ININLOWOUT
Grant LOWLOWOUT
Tymoor LOWOUT
Christine OUT
     Green background and WINNER means the overall winner.
     Blue background and WIN means the designer won that challenge.
     Red background and OUT means the designer lost and was out of the competition.
     Light blue background and HIGH means the designer had one of the highest scores for that challenge.
     Pink background and LOW means the designer had one of the lowest scores for that challenge.
     Orange background and LOW means the designer had the second lowest score for that challenge.

Contestants

The twelve contestants are:

  • Christine Newman, 21
  • Fatz Kassim, 31
  • Giles Pearson, 28
  • Grant Lilley, 23
  • Henry James Blogg, 22
  • Luisa Fici, 22
  • Luke Youngblood, 20
  • Monika Patrycja Rene, 28
  • Shawla Ahad, 31
  • Tyla Schneider, 25
  • Tymoor Gharbo, 22
  • Wayne Aveline, 33

Fashion models

  • Betsie Dsane
  • Dasha Zeromska
  • Erica Harrison
  • Gabriella Riggon
  • Khiara Parker
  • Liana Goss
  • Mary (Voluntarily left, ep.2)
  • Nicola Vernon
  • Rachel Ritfeld
  • Ruth Waterfall-Brown
  • Sally Kettle (Eliminated, ep.2 but then replaced Mary)
  • Simona Ehmann-Swims
gollark: `x mod y` is just the remainder when `x` is divided by `y`.
gollark: While you're here, consider some x where x^2 mod 384 = 8.3. Continue considering it. This is NOT to distract you.
gollark: So they should line up.
gollark: "Bad" inasmuch as you were seemingly saying that "balanced" outcomes were always the "good" ones earlier.
gollark: I don't see why you would want more disease unless:- you value human suffering or some adjacent thing- you think it would reduce total disease over time, which is irrelevant if you just entirely wipe it out with technologyâ„¢- you value "balance" or something as a goal in itself, which seems bad
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.