Project Catwalk (series 2)
Series 2 of Project Catwalk premiered on 8 January 2007 on Sky One. It was presented by Kelly Osbourne.
Series 2 Challenges
Designer | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wayne | WIN | LOW | LOW | IN | IN | WIN | LOW | LOW | HIGH | WINNER |
Monika | HIGH | LOW | LOW | WIN | WIN | IN | HIGH | LOW | WIN | RUNNER-UP |
Luke | IN | IN | HIGH | LOW | HIGH | LOW | WIN | WIN | LOW | 3RD PLACE |
Giles | IN | IN | IN | HIGH | IN | IN | HIGH | LOW | OUT | |
Shawla | IN | IN | IN | IN | LOW | IN | HIGH | OUT | ||
Fatz | IN | WIN | WIN | LOW | IN | LOW | OUT | |||
Luisa | IN | HIGH | IN | IN | LOW | OUT | ||||
Tyla | LOW | IN | IN | LOW | OUT | |||||
Henry | IN | IN | LOW | OUT | ||||||
Grant | LOW | LOW | OUT | |||||||
Tymoor | LOW | OUT | ||||||||
Christine | OUT |
- Green background and WINNER means the overall winner.
- Blue background and WIN means the designer won that challenge.
- Red background and OUT means the designer lost and was out of the competition.
- Light blue background and HIGH means the designer had one of the highest scores for that challenge.
- Pink background and LOW means the designer had one of the lowest scores for that challenge.
- Orange background and LOW means the designer had the second lowest score for that challenge.
Contestants
The twelve contestants are:
- Christine Newman, 21
- Fatz Kassim, 31
- Giles Pearson, 28
- Grant Lilley, 23
- Henry James Blogg, 22
- Luisa Fici, 22
- Luke Youngblood, 20
- Monika Patrycja Rene, 28
- Shawla Ahad, 31
- Tyla Schneider, 25
- Tymoor Gharbo, 22
- Wayne Aveline, 33
Fashion models
- Betsie Dsane
- Dasha Zeromska
- Erica Harrison
- Gabriella Riggon
- Khiara Parker
- Liana Goss
- Mary (Voluntarily left, ep.2)
- Nicola Vernon
- Rachel Ritfeld
- Ruth Waterfall-Brown
- Sally Kettle (Eliminated, ep.2 but then replaced Mary)
- Simona Ehmann-Swims
gollark: `x mod y` is just the remainder when `x` is divided by `y`.
gollark: While you're here, consider some x where x^2 mod 384 = 8.3. Continue considering it. This is NOT to distract you.
gollark: So they should line up.
gollark: "Bad" inasmuch as you were seemingly saying that "balanced" outcomes were always the "good" ones earlier.
gollark: I don't see why you would want more disease unless:- you value human suffering or some adjacent thing- you think it would reduce total disease over time, which is irrelevant if you just entirely wipe it out with technologyâ„¢- you value "balance" or something as a goal in itself, which seems bad
External links
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.