Poor Act 1552

The 1552 Act for the Provision and Relief of the Poor was a statute passed by the Parliament of England during the reign of King Edward VI. It is a part of the Tudor Poor Laws and reaffirms previous poor laws enacted in 1536, 1547, and 1549 which focused primarily on the punishment of vagabonds. [1] The Poor Act of 1552 designated a new position, "collector of alms," in each parish. Local authorities and residents elected two alms collectors to request, record, and distribute charitable donations for poor relief. It further provided that each parish would keep a register of all its “impotent, aged, and needy persons” and the aid they received. Parish authorities were directed to “gently exhort” any person that could contribute but would not, referring them to the Bishop of the Diocese if they continued to refuse. Punishment for neglecting poor relief obligations was adopted in 1563 and reliance on charity was replaced by a system of taxation in 1597. [2] Under the assumption that all poor would be cared for, begging openly was now forbidden.[3] Licensed begging would be reinstated by the Marian Parliament of 1555 with the requirement that legal beggars wear badges.[4]

Poor Act of 1552
Long titleAn Act for the Provision and Relief of the Poor
Citation5 & 6 Edw 6 c 2
Status: Repealed

Social context

During the Tudor period, cultural perceptions began to shift away from the medieval theological belief that poverty was a virtue.[5] The philosophical influence of Renaissance humanism[6] and the emergence of a Protestant work ethic[7] and rogue literature[8] contributed to views encouraging industriousness and the stewardship of wealth and vilifying idleness, begging, and vagrancy. As poverty rates and the costs of poor relief rose, communities attempted to define and limit who qualified for aid, restricting support by locality and moral conduct.[9]

Economic context

The rise of poverty rates during the Tudor period can be attributed to a confluence of factors. Rebellions in 1549 hampered harvest efforts and crop shortages in the following years contributed to price inflation.[10] A series of coin debasements between 1544-1551 undermined economic confidence.[11] Rapid population growth and the effects of Tudor enclosure policies led to the supply of labor exceeding demand and agricultural and industrial wages falling sharply. High birth-rates also meant a large percentage of the population were too young to contribute economically.[12] Additionally, the dissolution of the monasteries removed all Catholic Church-operated charities, religious guilds, and lay fraternities that provided formal and informal aid and confiscated parish lands and livestock which had also been used to provide poor relief. The process of replacing these institutions was often slow and uneven.[13]

gollark: > I'm inExcellent. Your mind state vector has been scanned using [REDACTED]. No further action on your part is necessary.
gollark: I mean, an evolutionary algorithm, not a *genetic* algorithm.
gollark: Approximately speaking, yes!
gollark: Are you one of those silly "continuity of consciousness" or "you can't just run 129175915 copies of my brain" people?
gollark: Alternatively, I guess you could run arbitrarily large amounts of lyricly instances to do a task, find the ones that are best at it, let *those* (virtually) sleep (using much less computing power than running all of them), [REDACTED] the rest, and then duplicate them when they awaken and repeat.

References
  1. 5&6 Edw. VI c. 2; Beier, A.L. (1983). The Problem of the Poor in Tudor and Early Stuart England. London: Methuen & Co Ltd. p. 39-40.; Elton, G.R. (1953). "An Early Tudor Poor Law". The Economic History Review. 6 (1): 55–67. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0289.1953.tb01486.x.
  2. Beier 1983, p. 41; Slack, Paul (1990). The English Poor Law 1531-1782. Macmillan Press Ltd. p. 10.
  3. 5&6 Edw. VI c. 2; Slack 1990, p. 59-60; Beier 1983, p. 40
  4. Rushton, Neil (2001). "Monastic Charitable Provision in Tudor England: Quantifying and Qualifying Poor Relief in the Early Sixteenth Century". Continuity and Change. 16 (1): 9–44. doi:10.1017/s0268416001003708.; Hindle, Steve (2004). "Dependency, Shame and Belonging: Badging the Deserving Poor, c.1550-1750". Cultural and Social History. 1 (1): 6–35.
  5. Thomas, Paul (1999). Authority and Disorder in Tudor Times 1485-1603. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. p. 40-41.
  6. Beier 1983, p. 17; Harvey, Richard (1979). "Recent Research on Poverty in Tudor-Stuart England: Review and Commentary". International Review of Social History. 24 (2): 237–252. doi:10.1017/s0020859000006040.
  7. Beier 1983, p. 14
  8. Beier 1983, p. 17
  9. McIntosh, Marjorie (2005). "Poverty, Charity, and Coercion in Elizabethan England". The Journal of Interdisciplinary History. 35 (3): 457–479. doi:10.1162/0022195052564234.; Beier 1983, p. 23
  10. Jordan, W.K. (1970). Edward VI: The Threshold of Power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. p. 472.
  11. Wordie, J.R. (1997). "Deflationary Factors in the Tudor Price Rise". Past and Present. 154: 32–70. doi:10.1093/past/154.1.32.; Leonard, E.M. (1900). The Early History of English Poor Relief. Cambridge University Press. p. 16.; Jordan 1970, p. 459
  12. Beier 1983, p.7; Wordie 1997
  13. McIntosh, Marjorie (1988). "Local Responses to the Poor in Late Medieval and Tudor England". Continuity and Change. 3 (2): 209–245. doi:10.1017/s0268416000000953.; McIntosh 2005; Beier 1983, p. 19-23
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.