Pimelite

Pimelite was discredited as a mineral species by the International Mineralogical Association (IMA) in 2006, in an article which suggests that “pimelite” specimens are probably willemseite (which is approved), or kerolite (which is also discredited). This was a mass discreditation, and not based on any re-examination of the type material (assuming any exists).[5] Nevertheless, a considerable number of papers have been written, verifying that pimelite is a nickel-dominant smectite.[4][6][7][8][9] It is always possible to redefine a mineral wrongly discredited.[5]

Pimelite
Pimelite from Szklary, Lower Silesia, Poland. Specimen size 2.3 cm
General
CategoryPhyllosilicates
Formula
(repeating unit)		Ni3Si4O10(OH)2.4H2O[1]
Strunz classification8/H.09-65 (8 ed)
Dana classification71.3.1b.5
Crystal systemHexagonal
Unknown space group
Identification
Formula mass554.5 g/mol[2]
ColorBright green, apple green, yellow-green
Crystal habitFine-grained, also fibrous
CleavageNone
FractureUneven to conchoidal
Mohs scale hardness2 to ​2 1⁄2
LusterWaxy
StreakWhite
DiaphaneityTranslucent
Specific gravity2.23 to 2.98
Optical propertiesBiaxial (-) Can appear isotropic due to fine grain size[3]
Refractive indexNx = 1.592, Ny = 1.615
PleochroismPale green, colourless to light yellow green
SolubilityDecomposed by acids[3]
Other characteristicsNeither radioactive[1] nor fluorescent[4] Expands to 17.35 A using glycol.[4] Nonmagnetic[2]
References[1][2][3][4]

The mineral was erroneously assumed to be a nickel-rich talc in a paper published in the American Mineralogist in 1979,[10] but it had already been determined to be a smectite as early as 1938, and this was confirmed in another article in the American Mineralogist in 1966.[8] Both nickel-bearing talc and nickel dominant smectite occur at the type locality, Szklary, Ząbkowice Śląskie County, Lower Silesia, Poland.[4]

Mineral group

According to the literature pimelite belongs to the smectite group, trioctahedral subgroup. (“Smectite” is the name of a group of minerals, not the name of a mineral species).

Subgroup members:[3]

  • hectorite (IMA questionable status) Na0.3(Mg,Li)3Si4O10(OH)2[1]
  • pimelite (IMA discredited) Ni3Si4O10(OH)2.4H2O[1]
  • saponite (Ca,Na)0.3(Mg,Fe2+)3(Si,Al)4O10(OH)2·4H2O[11]
  • sauconite Na0.3Zn3(Si,Al)4O10(OH)2·4H2O[11]
  • stevensite (IMA questionable status) (Ca0.5,Na)0.33(Mg,Fe++)3Si4O10(OH)2.n(H2O)[1]
  • yakhontovite (Ca,Na,K)0.2(Cu,Fe,Mg)2Si4O10(OH)2·3H2O[11]
  • zincsilite Zn3Si4O10(OH)2·4H2O[11]

Smectite group minerals are phyllosilicate clay minerals.[3] Pimelite apparently constitutes part of the mixtures called garnierite or noumeite, and it could form a series with stevensite or saponite.[3] It has a molar mass of 554.5 g.[2]

Discovery

Pimelite was discovered in 1788 by Martin Heinrich Klaproth, and renamed in 1800 by Dietrich Ludwig Gustav Karsten (de:Dietrich Ludwig Gustav Karsten)[12] from the Greek word for fat, in allusion to the appearance.[3]

Structure

It belongs to the hexagonal crystal system, but the crystal class is unknown. As with all phyllosilicates, the basic structural element is a triple layer, called a t-o-t layer, where "t" stands for a tetrahedral sheet and "o" stands for an octahedral sheet. The tetrahedral sheets comprise (Si,Al)O4 tetrahedra, linked together in nearly hexagonal rings. Three of the oxygens in each tetrahedron form links to other tetrahedra in the sheet, and the fourth oxygen, the apical oxygen, points away from the sheet. The apical oxygens of one tetahedral sheet face the apical oxygens of the other tetrahedral sheet, forming octahedral sites between the sheets, and this is the octahedral "o" layer. The octahedral sites may be fully occupied by divalent cations, producing trioctahedral layers, where each O or OH ion is surrounded by 3 divalent cations. Alternatively the octahedral sites may be 2/3 occupied by trivalent cations, producing dioctahedral layers, where each O or OH ion is surrounded by 2 trivalent cations.[3] There is one formula unit per unit cell (Z = 1), and the unit cell parameters are a = 5.256 Å and c = 14.822 Å. When treated with glycol the cell expands to 17.35 Å.[4]

Appearance

Pimelite does not form visible crystals. It is fine-grained or fibrous, with the apple green color typical of nickel compounds. It is translucent, with a white streak and a waxy luster.

Optical properties

It is biaxial (-) but it can appear isotropic due to its fine grain size.[3] The refractive indices are Nx = 1.592 and Ny = 1.615. It is pleochroic, pale green, and colorless to light yellow green. It is not fluorescent.[4]

Physical properties

Pimelite breaks with an uneven to conchoidal fracture, but it shows no cleavage. It is soft with Mohs hardness 2 to ​2 1⁄2, similar to that of gypsum, and its specific gravity is 2.23 to 2.98. It is neither radioactive[1] nor magnetic.[2] It is decomposed by acids.[3]

Occurrence

Pimelite is found in lateritic nickel ore deposits above serpentinites or dunites, frequently mixed with nickel-rich serpentine minerals or quartz. The type locality is Kosemutz, near Frankenstein, Silesia, Poland,[3] and it has also been found in New Jersey, USA. A nickel silicate hydroxide mineral was first described from Franklin, New Jersey, in 1889, but it has not been reported from the neighbouring Sterling Hill. It was originally called desaulesite, for Major de Saules, manager of the Trotter Mine at Franklin, but that name is now used for zinc-rich garnierite.[13] In 1966 the material was shown to be identical with pimelite.[8] Pimelite from the Trotter Shaft occurs as localized, patchy, thin crusts and dense 1 to 6 cm masses as an alteration product of nickel arsenides. It is a secondary, low-temperature mineral, associated with annabergite, fluorite, baryte and sphalerite.[14]

gollark: I think my use cases are nice usecases, and I think it has flaws even in the domains it seems to be targeted at.
gollark: I think it should at least not, essentially, deliberately cripple itself at some classes of thing.
gollark: I'm not sure exactly what they're targeting - maybe trendy cloud™-type tools, simple webservers, etc - but even *in* that domain it just seems bad to me.
gollark: If they did in fact mean it as a DSL for deploying bees against Google Cloud, they should say so.
gollark: I mean, I did say "treated as a general purpose language" so it's fairly reasonable.

References
  1. Webmineral data
  2. http://www.wolframalpha.com/entities/minerals/pimelite
  3. Gaines et al (1997) Dana’s New Mineralogy Eighth Edition. Wiley
  4. Mindat.org
  5. Burke (2007) Canadian Mineralogist: 44-6: 1557
  6. Economic Geology (1949) 44:13
  7. Economic Geology (2004) 99:1197
  8. Faust (1966) American Mineralogist 51:279
  9. Manceau and Calas (1985) American Mineralogist 70: 549
  10. Brindley, Bish and Wan (1979) American Mineralogist 64:615
  11. http://rruff.info/ima
  12. "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2011-07-27. Retrieved 2011-02-22.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  13. http://www.mindat.org/min-11584.html
  14. http://franklin-sterlinghill.com/dunn/ch18/pimelite.stm>
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.