Phobetron pithecium

Phobetron pithecium, the hag moth, is a moth of the family Limacodidae. Its larva is known as the monkey slug.

Phobetron pithecium
Scientific classification
Kingdom:
Phylum:
Class:
Order:
Family:
Genus:
Species:
P. pithecium
Binomial name
Phobetron pithecium
(JE Smith, 1797)

Lifecycle

One generation a year occurs in the north, but two or more happen in the southern United States.[1]

Larva

Larva, Michigan, mid-August
Underside of larva, showing reduced legs

The larva is distinctive, with no close analogues, although it may be mistaken for the shed skin of a hairy spider or leaf debris. It has six pairs of curly projections, three long and three short from the flattened body, each densely covered in hairs. According to David L. Wagner, who experimented on himself, the hairs do not sting, contrary to popular belief. However, susceptibility can vary among humans and it may produce a reaction in some people. Some members of the family Limacodidae do sting. Like all limacodids, the legs are shortened and the prolegs are reduced to suction cups. The "arms" can fall off without harming the caterpillar. Maximum length of larvae is 2.5 centimetres (0.98 in).[1]

It is solitary and is not a very significant agricultural threat, but it is a common sight in orchards.

Pupa

This species pupates in a cup-shaped cocoon with a circular escape hatch.

Adult

Adult hag moth in Florida

The adult moth has a wingspan up to 3 centimetres (1.2 in). The male has translucent wings, and the female is drab brown and gray, with yellow puffs on her legs. The day-flying female is said to mimic a bee, complete with pollen sacs, and the male mimics a wasp.[1]

Food plants

Larvae eat a variety of deciduous trees and shrubs, such as apple, ash, birch, cherry, chestnut, dogwood, hickory, oak, persimmon, walnut, and willow.[1]

gollark: Also "it might be bad for children because [EQUIVOCATION] and apparently bad study".
gollark: I did GCSE German so I vaguely remember a bunch of the grammar and words.
gollark: It seems like this is being approached from the perspective of "you need to show very well that there's a good reason to make this legal" and not the other way round, because apparently people are just used to "of course things which *might* be bad are banned".
gollark: I don't know. Do you know? Does *anyone* actually have high-quality information on this?
gollark: I think it mostly got lost to the various C4 incidents.

References

  1. Wagner, David L. (2010). Caterpillars of Eastern North America. Princeton University Press. p. 44. ISBN 978-1400834143.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.