Paradise Dam (Montana)

Paradise Dam was a proposed dam on the Clark Fork River in Montana. It was proposed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers as an alternative to the construction of Glacier View Dam on the western boundary of Glacier National Park, to capture the flow of the Flathead River. The earth embankment dam was planned to be about 250 feet (76 m) high, impounding a reservoir of 4,080,000 acre feet (5.03 km3). While it was viewed as a desirable power generation and water storage project by the Corps of Engineers, it was opposed by those it would displace from towns and productive agricultural lands, and was never built.

Paradise Dam
Paradise Dam as proposed
Location of Paradise Dam in Montana
LocationSanders County, near Paradise, Montana, USA
Coordinates47°24′57″N 114°50′00″W
StatusCancelled
Operator(s)U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Dam and spillways
ImpoundsClark Fork River and Flathead River
Height250 ft (76 m)
Length3,750 ft (1,140 m)
Spillway typeGated spillway
Reservoir
CreatesParadise Reservoir
Total capacity4,080,000 acre feet (5.03 km3)
Surface area103 square miles (270 km2)
Power Station
Turbines8 x 72 MW turbines, 6 additional to be installed later
Installed capacity576 MW initially
1000 MW in a later phase

Proposal

The dam was proposed in the 1940s as an alternative to the controversial Glacier View Dam, which was strenuously opposed by the National Park Service and conservation organizations as an intrusion into national park lands. It would have inundated 9,000 acres (3,600 ha) of already-irrigated and farmed lands, with the reservoir extending 49 miles (79 km) up the Clark Fork and 72 miles (116 km) up the Flathead to the base of Kerr Dam. The project required the relocation of roads, rail lines and houses and businesses in several communities. The cost in 1950 was estimated at $265,569,000.[1]

Alternative sites at The Plains, five miles downstream from Plains, Montana, and the Weeks site, three miles downstream from the Plains site, were examined but rejected on grounds of poor foundation conditions. Three other sites, Knowles (river mile 4), Perma (river mile 11) and Oxbow (river mile 41) were rejected on similar grounds.[2]

Reception

While the project was supported by some local organizations, local opposition was intense, focusing on displacement of productive agriculture and populations and intrusion on Indian rights. Land replacement compensation for the National Bison Range was considered likely. As a result, planning was not pursued and the project remained an alternative to other project farther upstream. In the event, none of the proposed reservoirs in the area were built, apart from Hungry Horse Reservoir.[2]

Description

The complex arrangement placed a 250-foot (76 m) earth embankment across the main channel of the river, diverting the flow to the west, where a straight intake dam structure extending parallel to the riverbed on the riverbank would receive water for the powerplant. A separate curved spillway dam would be located downstream from the intake dam. At the end of the diverted channel an embankment saddle dam would seal the channel. The powerplant was planned to have an initial capacity of 576 MW with eight 72MW units, expandable to 1000 MW with six more generators in the future.[3]

gollark: You can't just selectively disable bits of potatOS.
gollark: I can, on the plus side, use SPUDNET to remotely wipe everything if you do that.
gollark: I really doubt it. We erased them all.
gollark: Well, lucky for us you don't have one, or ██████ Siri.
gollark: ····

References

  1. "Columbia River and Tributaries, Northwestern United States". Army Corps of Engineers. March 20, 1950. p. 155. Missing or empty |url= (help)
  2. Corps of Engineers 1950 Columbia River and Tributaries Report, p. 156
  3. Corps of Engineers 1950 Columbia River and Tributaries Report, Paradise Dam schematic plan
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.