Panoquina
Panoquina is a genus of skippers in the family Hesperiidae.
| Panoquina | |
|---|---|
.jpg) | |
| Purple-washed skipper P. lucas lucas, Cuba | |
| Scientific classification | |
| Kingdom: | |
| Phylum: | |
| Class: | |
| Order: | |
| Family: | |
| Subfamily: | |
| Tribe: | Calpodini |
| Genus: | Panoquina Hemming, 1934 |
| Synonyms | |
| |
Species
- Panoquina bola Bell, 1942
- Panoquina chapada Evans, 1955
- Panoquina corrupta (Herrich-Schäffer, 1865)
- Panoquina errans (Skinner, 1892)
- Panoquina evadnes (Stoll, [1781])
- Panoquina evansi (Freeman, 1946)
- Panoquina fusina (Hewitson, 1868)
- Panoquina hecebola (Scudder, 1872)
- Panoquina lucas (Fabricius, 1793) – purple-washed skipper
- Panoquina luctuosa (Herrich-Schäffer, 1869)
- Panoquina nero (Fabricius, 1798)
- Panoquina ocola (Edwards, 1863)
- Panoquina panoquin (Scudder, 1863)
- Panoquina panoquinoides (Skinner, 1891)
- Panoquina pauper (Mabille, 1878)
- Panoquina peraea (Hewitson, 1866)
- Panoquina trix Evans, 1955
gollark: Yes. It's not unique to Haskell.
gollark: For example, if I was doing Haskell, I could write everything awfully in `IO` and make it very comprehensible to a C user, or I could write it in some crazy pointfree way which I don't understand 5 seconds after writing it.
gollark: e.g. you probably wouldn't just go for C, if you wanted to avoid being caught.
gollark: You can't infer much from language choice as people will obviously try and spoof that.
gollark: Often you can *write* a thing in a basic obvious way, but *read* code doing it in a fancy exotic way.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.