PP-14 (Rawalpindi-IX)

PP-14 (Rawalpindi-IX) is a Constituency of Provincial Assembly of Punjab.[1]

PP-9 (Rawalpindi-IX)
Provincial Constituency
for the Provincial Assembly of Punjab
Current constituency

2008—2013: PP-9 (Rawalpindi-IX)

Contesting CandidatesParty AffiliationVotes Polled

2013—2018: PP-9 (Rawalpindi-IX)

General elections were held on 11 May 2013. Asif Mehmood won this seat with 29797 votes.

All candidates receiving over 1,000 votes are listed here.

Contesting CandidatesParty AffiliationVotes Polled
Asif MehmoodPTI29797
Chaudhary Muhammad AyazPML-N29524
Rizwan Moueed RajaPPP2849
Adnan Ahmed NisarAML1656
Zeeshan MumtazIndependent1575
Muhammad Basharat AhmadJI1342

2018—2023 PP-14 (Rawalpindi-IX)

From 2018 PP-9 (Rawalpindi-IX) Become PP-14 Rawalpindi-IX With Some changes has follow (a)The following Census Charges of Rawalpindi Cantonment (1) Charge No.3 excluding Circle No. 1, 2 and 3 (2) Charge No.4 (3) Charge No.5 and (4) Charge No.6 (b) The following Census Charges of Chaklala Cantonment (1) Charge No.5 excluding Circle No. 4 and (2) Charge No.6 of Rawalpindi District.

General election 2018: PP-14 (Rawalpindi-IX)[2][3]
Party Candidate Votes % ±
PTI Muhammad Basharat raja 54,098
PML (N) Osama Chaudry 32,837
TLP Muhammad Waseem 6,761
MMA Rizwan ahmed 5,088
PPP Aga Mugeeb Ahmed Khan 1,389
Independent Haji Zafar Iqbal 826
Independent Abbas abid 417
Independent Waseem ahmed 403
Independent Muhammad Nasir 398
AAT Shazia Syed Abbasi 337
Independent Tusaif Ahmed 249
Independent Raja Imran Hussain 224
Independent Muhammad Qasim 147
Independent Rashid Mehmmod 134
Independent Zafar Iqbal 74
Independent Shoukat raheed 64
Turnout 103,446 51.27
gollark: Oh, and in terms of arbitrary preferences, I'd probably make some of the web APIs more functional programming™️ instead of using objects; instead of `URL` objects, you would just have a `parseURL` function returning a table of URL components, and `serializeURL` function... unparsing it.
gollark: Well, also the web is gigantically complicated and there's no hope of dislodging it.
gollark: WebRTC is overcomplicated and no, so an alternative API would... allow you to listen and send on high-numbered TCP/UDP ports, or something? Not sure of the exact implications of that.
gollark: The user agent is stupid and would instead be feature flags.
gollark: As of now I believe you can check a bunch of things like that without getting permission to access them.

See also

References


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.