Open Invention Network

Open Invention Network (OIN) is a patent non-aggression community that supports freedom of action in Linux as a key element of open source software. OIN acquires patents and licenses them royalty-free to its community members who, in turn, agree not to assert their own patents against Linux and Linux-related systems and applications.[1]

Open Invention Network
Limited liability company
IndustryIntellectual property
FoundedNovember 10, 2005 (2005-11-10)
Headquarters
Durham, North Carolina
,
United States
Key people
Keith Bergelt
ServicesLinux protection
Websitewww.openinventionnetwork.com

History

The company was incorporated on 31 October 2005.[2] Based in Durham, NC, it was founded on November 10 by IBM, Novell, Philips, Red Hat, and Sony. NEC subsequently became a Member. In December 2013, Google became a Member. In July 2016, it was announced that Toyota became a Member. On October 10, 2018, Erich Andersen announced that Microsoft joined as a licensee.[3] Canonical and TomTom are Associate Members. Keith Bergelt is the chief executive of the company. Bergelt had previously served as President and CEO of Paradox Capital, LLC[4] As of December, 2019 membership in the OIN stood at approximately 3,100 companies.[5]

Open Invention Network has more than 1,300 U.S. and international patents and patent applications. It holds the Commerce One Web services patents (previously acquired by Novell for $15.5 million), which cover several fundamentals of current business-to-business e-commerce practice. OIN's founders intend for these patents to encourage others to join, and to discourage legal threats against Linux and Linux-related applications. As of December 2019, OIN had more than 3,100 community members (licensees).[5]

The list of key applications considered by OIN, according to Red Hat's Mark Webbink,[6] includes Apache, Eclipse, Evolution, Fedora Directory Server, Firefox, GIMP, GNOME, KDE, Mono, Mozilla, MySQL, Nautilus, OpenLDAP, OpenOffice.org, Open-Xchange, Perl, PostgreSQL, Python, Samba, SELinux, Sendmail, and Thunderbird.

On March 26, 2007, Oracle licensed OIN's portfolio, thus agreeing not to assert patents against the GNU/Linux-based environment, including competitors MySQL and PostgreSQL[7] when used as part of a GNU/Linux system. Oracle exercised a Limitation Election on March 29, 2012. On August 7, 2007, Google also joined OIN as a licensee.[8] On October 2, 2007, Barracuda Networks joined OIN as a licensee.[9] On March 23, 2009 TomTom joined OIN as a licensee.[10] In May 2011, the European Open Source software manufacturer Univention joined OIN as a licensee.[11]

In early September 2009, Open Invention Network acquired 30 patents, from Allied Security Trust, another defensive patent management organization, that had been acquired from Microsoft through a private auction. If the patents had been acquired by patent trolls, they might have caused financial obstacles to Linux developers, distributors and users. OIN was able to avert this issue with the patent acquisition.[12]

On October 10, 2018, Microsoft joined the Open Invention Network community despite holding more than 60,000 patents.[13]

On November 19, 2019, Open Invention Network announced that it was teaming with IBM, Microsoft and the Linux Foundation to further protect Linux and open source from Patent Assertion Entities (PAE), commonly called Patent Trolls. Together, the organizations are funding a multi-million dollar, multi-year initiative with Unified Patents' Open Source Zone. This expands OIN’s and its partners’ patent non-aggression activities by deterring PAEs from targeting Linux and adjacent OSS technologies relied on by developers, distributors and users.[14]

Ways to participate with Open Invention Network

Open Invention Network has three levels of participation,[15] each of which helps to promote open source as a modality for invention and ensure ongoing freedom of action for GNU/Linux community members:

  • Members — Open Invention Network receives significant financial backing from large companies. OIN's Members include Google, Microsoft, IBM, NEC, Philips, Red Hat, Sony, SUSE and Toyota.
  • Associate Members — Associate Members are recruited from Linux-related companies. Associate Members make a commitment to the Linux Community by virtue of their commitments to and membership in OIN and help to ensure that patent issues do not impair growth of Linux-based systems.
  • Licensees — Any company or organization that agrees to refrain from using its patent portfolio against the Linux System may become an OIN licensee. Licensees benefit from royalty-free access to a valuable and growing portfolio of strategic patents, as well as from ongoing communication with OIN concerning Linux-related patent issues. In so doing, licensees facilitate their access to OIN resources such as Linux Defenders, which is designed to address patent issues with the potential to impact Linux. OIN licensees, be they founding members, associate members or licensees, contribute to an ever-expanding community of companies that share a common goal of ensuring freedom of action in and across the GNU/Linux ecosystem. Through their unified commitment to Linux, they limit the negative effect of patent-based challenges mounted by companies antagonistic to Linux and open source innovation.[16]

On June 22, 2010, OIN announced a new Associate Member program and the recruitment of Canonical (previously an OIN licensee) as its first associate member.[17] The announcement drew criticism from anti-software-patent activist and a European lobbyist Florian Müller,[18][19] who had previously criticized[20] the OIN for a lack of transparency and for defining arbitrarily the scope of the patent protection it offers. Florian Mueller's credibility in attacking OIN has been called into question due to his paid relationship with corporate sponsors.[21]

Linux defenders

OIN encourages practices that eliminate low-quality patents—the foodstuff of aggressive strategics and patent trolls.[22] Specifically, OIN encourages the Linux and open source communities to become active in:

  • "Inter Partes Review", also known as “IPRs”, is a procedure for challenging the validity of an issued patent owned by a third party. By challenging patents with IPRs, the Linux and broader open source community can help to eliminate them. Unified Patents has successfully invalidated a number of patents using Inter Partes Review.[23]
  • "Third-Party Preissuance Submissions" provide for challenging the validity of a patent application. They provide a mechanism for third parties to submit prior art of potential relevance to the United States Patent and Trademark Office during the examination of another party’s patent application.[24] In this way, the Linux and broader open source community can help to eliminate patents, and particularly help to mitigate the issuance of new low-quality patents. A patent application challenger may remain unnamed or anonymous by asking a firm to complete the Third-Party Preissuance Submission on its behalf.[25]
  • "Defensive publications" codify ‘known’ inventions that have not previously been patented so that they can be brought to the attention of the patent office to ensure that later developed patent applications claiming such inventions do not issue. Defensive Publications are a vehicle which allows the Linux and broader open source community to create valuable prior art that ensures future freedom-of-action / freedom to operate in the areas covered by them. Many Defensive Publications can be searched for free in IP.com’s Prior Art Database.[26]
gollark: I meant to just use <#319290188675284992>, oops.
gollark: I've noticed an increase in "free" eggs which people want hatchlings for recently.
gollark: They're quite common though, so I should be able to get another soon.
gollark: Oh, sorry, I did somehow actually manage to trade it.
gollark: <@139972637962010624> Do you have a magi? Mine is on cooldown.

See also

References
  1. "Open Invention Network Collects Patents to Promote Royalty-Free Linux". Cover Pages. November 11, 2005.
  2. https://opencorporates.com/companies/us_de/4053163
  3. https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/microsoft-joins-open-invention-network-to-help-protect-linux-and-open-source/
  4. "Management Team". Open Invention Network. Retrieved June 26, 2008.
  5. "The OIN Community - Open Invention Network".
  6. Webbink, Mark (April 27, 2006). "The Open Invention Network". Linux Magazine.
  7. Shankland, Stephen (March 26, 2007). "Oracle bands with open-source patent group". News.com. Retrieved March 27, 2007.
  8. "Google To Join Group To Protect Linux From Possible Patent Challenge". InformationWeek. August 7, 2007.
  9. Asay, Matt (October 2, 2007). "Barracuda Networks: An unsung hero of open source and a new member of Open Invention Network". barracudanetworks.com (In the News). Archived from the original on July 7, 2011. Retrieved October 4, 2007.
  10. "Open Invention Network Extends The Linux Ecosystem As TomTom Becomes Licensee". PRWEB.
  11. "Univention joins the OIN patent pool". Heise Media UK Ltd. May 3, 2011. Archived from the original on November 17, 2011. Retrieved May 30, 2012.
  12. https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB125236988735891147
  13. "Microsoft has signed up to the Open Invention Network. We repeat. Microsoft has signed up to the OIN".
  14. https://www.zdnet.com/article/open-invention-network-teams-up-with-ibm-linux-foundation-and-microsoft-to-protect-open-source-software-from-patent-trolls/
  15. "IBM expands patent troll fight with its massive IP portfolio". SearchSoftwareQuality. Retrieved 2020-07-01.
  16. http://www.marketwatch.com/story/open-invention-network-announces-associate-member-program-and-recruits-canonical-as-its-first-associate-member-2010-06-22?reflink=MW_news_stmp
  17. "Open Invention Network Announces Associate Member Program and Recruits Canonical As Its First Associate Member". OIN. Archived from the original on June 26, 2010.
  18. "Ubuntu daddy in patent class of its own". TheRegister.
  19. "Canonical Assimilated by the OIN Borg". Daniweb.
  20. "Mueller calls OIN a scam". ZDNet.
  21. "Study on the worldwide use of FRAND-committed patents".
  22. "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2011-07-18. Retrieved 2010-06-25.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  23. http://unifiedpatents.com/unified-invalidates-claims-in-ipr-against-marathon-owned-vantage-point-technology/
  24. http://www.uspto.gov/patent/initiatives/third-party-preissuance-submissions
  25. http://www.law360.com/articles/588491/7-things-to-know-about-3rd-party-submissions-of-art
  26. https://priorart.ip.com/
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.