No More (A1 song)

"No More" is a song by British-Norwegian boy band A1. It was released on 19 February 2001 as the third single from their second studio album, The A List (2000). The song was written by Stevie Bensusen, Claudio Cueni, Lindy Robbins, and Damon Sharpe, and produced by the former two. The song was re-produced and remixed by Danish production duo Cutfather & Joe for the song's single release.

"No More"
Single by A1
from the album The A List
B-side"Three Times a Lady"
Released19 February 2001
Recorded2000
GenrePop
Length3:43
LabelEpic
Songwriter(s)Stevie Bensusen, Claudio Cueni, Lindy Robbins, Damon Sharpe
Producer(s)Stevie Bensusen, Claudio Cueni, Cutfather & Joe
A1 singles chronology
"Same Old Brand New You"
(2000)
"No More"
(2001)
"Caught in the Middle"
(2002)
Music video
"No More" on YouTube

The song peaked at number six on the UK Singles Chart, becoming the band's seventh consecutive top 10 single, following two consecutive number-one singles.

Music video

The video for "No More" was filmed in Singapore, as the Asian Pacific region was at the time a major market for the boy band sound.

Track listing

  • UK CD single #1
  1. "No More" (Cutfather & Joe Mix) – 3:43
  2. "Three Times a Lady" – 3:37
  3. "I'll Take the Tears" (Live on the UK2K Tour) – 4:38
  • UK CD single #2
  1. "No More" (Riprock 'n' Alex G Mix) – 3:28
  2. "No More" (E-Smoove Club Mix) – 9:00
  3. "Livin' La Vida Loca" (Live on the UK2K Tour) – 3:45
  • European CD single #1
  1. "No More" (Cutfather & Joe Mix) – 3:43
  2. "Three Times a Lady" – 3:37

Charts

Chart (2001) Peak
position
Ireland (IRMA)[1] 35
Scotland (Official Charts Company)[2] 5
Sweden (Sverigetopplistan)[3] 56
UK Singles (Official Charts Company)[4] 6
gollark: > all bridging functionality is... how do I put this... bad from an objective perspectiveFactually incorrect, especially with how pleased I am with the elegance™ of the bridge code.
gollark: > there are examples of discriminationOnly against bad things, like LyricLy.> code formatting issuesMy code is formatted in accordance with the standard.> in the past there have been, well I'll go as far as to say that there have been bugsNope. These are features.
gollark: If ABR is nongood, this must mean it has nongood attributes of some sort, but it doesn't, so you're wrong.
gollark: Wrong.
gollark: <@319753218592866315> Anything to say about my flawless logic?

References


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.