Neotrops
Neotrops is a genus of spiders in the family Oonopidae. It was first described in 2013 by Grismado & Ramírez. As of 2017, it contains 28 species.[1]
| Neotrops | |
|---|---|
Scientific classification  | |
| Kingdom: | Animalia |
| Phylum: | Arthropoda |
| Subphylum: | Chelicerata |
| Class: | Arachnida |
| Order: | Araneae |
| Infraorder: | Araneomorphae |
| Family: | Oonopidae |
| Genus: | Neotrops Ramírez[1] |
| Type species | |
| Neotrops darwini | |
| Species | |
|
28, see text | |
Species
Neotrops comprises the following species:[1]
- Neotrops amacuro Grismado & Ramírez, 2013
- Neotrops avalosi Grismado & Ramírez, 2013
- Neotrops caparu Grismado & Ramírez, 2013
- Neotrops darwini Grismado & Ramírez, 2013
- Neotrops donaldi (Chickering, 1951)
- Neotrops izquierdoi Grismado & Ramírez, 2013
- Neotrops kopuchianae Grismado & Ramírez, 2013
- Neotrops labarquei Grismado & Ramírez, 2013
- Neotrops lopardoae Grismado & Ramírez, 2013
- Neotrops lorenae Grismado & Ramírez, 2013
- Neotrops maracay Grismado & Ramírez, 2013
- Neotrops nigromaculatus (Mello-Leitão, 1944)
- Neotrops pakitza Grismado & Ramírez, 2013
- Neotrops piacentinii Grismado & Ramírez, 2013
- Neotrops pithecia Grismado & Ramírez, 2013
- Neotrops platnicki Grismado & Ramírez, 2013
- Neotrops poguazu Grismado & Ramírez, 2013
- Neotrops pombero Grismado & Ramírez, 2013
- Neotrops ramirezi Izquierdo & Grismado, 2014
- Neotrops rubioi Grismado & Ramírez, 2013
- Neotrops santamarta Grismado & Ramírez, 2013
- Neotrops sciosciae Grismado & Ramírez, 2013
- Neotrops silvae Grismado & Ramírez, 2013
- Neotrops trapellus (Chickering, 1970)
- Neotrops tucumanus (Simon, 1907)
- Neotrops waorani Grismado & Ramírez, 2013
- Neotrops yabare Grismado & Ramírez, 2013
- Neotrops yunga Grismado & Ramírez, 2013
gollark: Wait, are you working on ZIRCONIUM DECEPTION too?
gollark: No, esobot okay?
gollark: Maybe I should just use the arbitrary code execution exploit I snuck into esobot when I patched WHY capability in.
gollark: It's just a warning that it *may* not obey causality, not that it *definitely doesn't*.
gollark: Possibly.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.