NZR D class (1929)

The NZR D class of 1929 comprised one 0-4-0 tank locomotive that was built for the New Zealand Railways Department by the Clayton Wagons Ltd in Lincoln, England.

NZR D class
Trial run of Clayton D class locomotive No 1 at Silverstream
Type and origin
BuilderClayton(1)
Build date1929
Specifications
Configuration:
  Whyte0-4-0
Driver dia.42
Loco weight25.7 long tons (26.1 t; 28.8 short tons)
Firebox:
  Firegrate area
12.5 sq ft (1.16 m2)
Boiler pressure300 lbf/in2 (2.07 MPa)
Heating surface320 sq ft (30 m2)
Cylinders4, vertical
Cylinder size7 in × 10 in (178 mm × 254 mm)
Career
OperatorsNZR
DispositionScrapped

History

Originally, D 1 was purchased for railcar type service but it was not successful. It had a White-Forster type boiler designed for a working pressure of 300 psi (2,068 kPa), had four vertical cylinders housed in the rear of the cab and was high geared. At a normal engine speed of 400 rpm, the unit was calculated to develop 200 horsepower (150 kW). The engine drove a central transverse jackshaft through reduction gearing, the drive from the jackshaft being transmitted to the wheels through conventional side rods.

Working Life

On arrival in New Zealand, D 1 was found to be more than 25 percent heavier than the specified maximum of 20 long tons (20.3 t; 22.4 short tons) and after trials in Wellington was allocated for use as a shunting engine at the Otahuhu workshops. However it never proved satisfactory and was written off in 1936 and scrapped and D 1 did not survive to be preserved.

Notes and references

Notes

    References

    • Millar, Sean (2011). The NZR Steam Locomotive. Wellington: New Zealand Railway and Locomotive Society. ISBN 978-0-908573-89-9.
    • Palmer, A. N.; Stewart, W. W. (1965). Cavalcade of New Zealand Locomotives. Wellington: A H. & A W. Reed. ISBN 978-0-207-94500-7.
    • Stewart, W. W. (1974). When Steam was King. Wellington: A. H. & A. W. Reed Ltd. ISBN 978-0-589-00382-1.
    gollark: And this seems too vaguely defined to be useful if you can just handwave any issue which does not in fact run on something like "balance" as being caused by some other imbalance.
    gollark: Actually, no, they're partly just background radiation. Nobody is particularly responsible for this, on the majority of Earth.
    gollark: By some unreasonably stretched definitions, maybe.
    gollark: There are upper and lower bounds for how much water I should drink. The precise amount of cancer I should contain is exactly zero, though.
    gollark: There are examples of this. There are examples of this not being the case.
    This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.