NUTS statistical regions of the Netherlands

In the NUTS (Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics) codes of the 'Netherlands (NL), the three levels are:

Level Subdivisions #
NUTS 1 Lands (Landsdelen) 4
NUTS 2 Provinces (Provincies) 12
NUTS 3 COROP regions (COROP regio's) 40
NUTS 1 - 4 Landsdelen

NUTS codes

NUTS 1 Code NUTS 2 Code NUTS 3 Code
North Netherlands NL1 Groningen NL11 East Groningen NL111
Delfzijl and surroundings NL112
Rest of Groningen NL113
Friesland NL12 North Friesland NL121
South West Friesland NL122
South East Friesland NL123
Drenthe NL13 North Drenthe NL131
South East Drenthe NL132
South West Drenthe NL133
East Netherlands NL2 Overijssel NL21 North Overijssel NL211
South West Overijssel NL212
Twente NL213
Gelderland NL22 Veluwe NL221
South West Gelderland NL224
Achterhoek NL225
Arnhem & Nijmegen NL226
Flevoland NL23 Flevoland NL230
West Netherlands NL3 Utrecht NL31 Utrecht NL310
North Holland NL32 Kop van North Holland NL321
Alkmaar and surroundings NL322
IJmond NL323
Haarlem agglomeration NL324
Zaanstreek NL325
Greater Amsterdam NL329

[1]

Het Gooi and Vechtstreek NL327
South Holland NL33 Leiden and Bollenstreek NL331
The Hague NL332
Delft and Westland NL333
East South Holland NL334
Rijnmond NL335
South South Holland NL336
Zeeland NL34 Zeelandic Flanders NL341
Overig Zeeland NL342
South Netherlands NL4 North Brabant NL41 West North Brabant NL411
Mid North Brabant NL412
North-East North Brabant NL413
South-East North Brabant NL414
Limburg NL42 North Limburg NL421
Mid Limburg NL422
South Limburg NL423

In the 2003 version, Achterhoek was coded NL222, Arnhem/Nijmegen was coded NL223.

Local administrative units

Below the NUTS levels, the two LAU (Local Administrative Units) levels are:

Level Subdivisions #
LAU 1 — (same as NUTS 3) 40
LAU 2 Municipalities (Gemeenten) 443

The LAU codes of the Netherlands can be downloaded here:

gollark: > Maybe you've never thought about this, but if there are 100 devs working for free you'd only need to hire 50 devs to compromise all their code.That's, um, still quite a lot given the large amounts of developers involved, and code review exists, and this kind of conspiracy could *never* stay secret for very long, and if you have an obvious backdoor obvious people are fairly likely to look at it and notice.
gollark: Those are increasingly not working because of better security in stuff, which is probably good.
gollark: There is actually a wikipedia page for that.
gollark: I mean, I got a letter back from some government official, having sent an *email* the week before, which was only tangentially related to what I actually said.
gollark: Well, I complained to my local MP about the UK government complaining about end-to-end encryption, and they basically ignored me.

See also

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.