Murray v Foyle Meats Ltd

Murray v Foyle Meats Ltd [1999] UKHL 30 is a UK labour law case, concerning redundancy, specifically the interpretation of the Employment Rights Act 1996.

Murray v Foyle Meats Ltd
CourtHouse of Lords
Citation(s)[1999] UKHL 30, [1999] ICR 827
Keywords
Redundancy

Facts

Foyle Meats Ltd's slaughtering business was declining. One production line in the slaughter hall was eliminated and 35 meat plant operatives were made redundant from the slaughter hall. The employees all had flexibility clauses and they sometimes rotated departments to the boning or loading hall, etc. The dismissed employees claimed they were not redundant because the employer still needed workers under the same terms, just in different departments.

Judgment

Lord Irvine LC held that the operatives were redundant and that "the language of the [Employment Rights Act 1996 section 139(1)(b)] is in my view simplicity itself". He referred to Nelson v BBC[1] which had wrongly propagated the "contract test" view, which was wrong. There was a simple causation test to apply, based on the word "attributable" in the statute. Did diminishing demand for labour cause the dismissal?

The argument before the Employment Appeal Tribunal turned on whether the ‘contract test’ ought to be applied (i.e. did the company need less employees [sic] of the kind specified in Mr Pink’s contract)…

Notes
  1. [1977] ICR 649, Megaw LJ, Roskill LJ and Browne LJ
gollark: Yep!
gollark: And on Tuesdays which are the 7th day of the month, relativistic time dilation is applied as if the speed of light is 100m/s.
gollark: Also, time jumps backward exactly 76022 seconds when a meteor shower begins.
gollark: But then add the 5 seconds again later, to maintain something or other.
gollark: Oh, and switch to Martian hours on February 29th.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.