Morphogen

A morphogen is a substance whose non-uniform distribution governs the pattern of tissue development in the process of morphogenesis or pattern formation, one of the core processes of developmental biology, establishing positions of the various specialized cell types within a tissue. More specifically, a morphogen is a signaling molecule that acts directly on cells to produce specific cellular responses depending on its local concentration.

Morphogenesis of Drosophila fruit flies is intensively studied in the laboratory

Typically, morphogens are produced by source cells and diffuse through surrounding tissues in an embryo during early development, such that concentration gradients are set up. These gradients drive the process of differentiation of unspecialised stem cells into different cell types, ultimately forming all the tissues and organs of the body. The control of morphogenesis is a central element in evolutionary developmental biology (evo-devo).

History

The term was coined by Alan Turing in the paper "The Chemical Basis of Morphogenesis", where he predicted a chemical mechanism for biological pattern formation,[1] decades before the formation of such patterns was demonstrated.[2]

The concept of the morphogen has a long history in developmental biology, dating back to the work of the pioneering Drosophila (fruit fly) geneticist, Thomas Hunt Morgan, in the early 20th century. Lewis Wolpert refined the morphogen concept in the 1960s with the French flag model, which described how a morphogen could subdivide a tissue into domains of different target gene expression (corresponding to the colours of the French flag). This model was championed by the leading Drosophila biologist, Peter Lawrence. Christiane Nüsslein-Volhard was the first to identify a morphogen, Bicoid, one of the transcription factors present in a gradient in the Drosophila syncitial embryo. She was awarded the 1995 Nobel Prize in Physiology and Medicine for her work explaining the morphogenic embryology of the common fruit fly.[3][4][5][6] Groups led by Gary Struhl and Stephen Cohen then demonstrated that a secreted signalling protein, Decapentaplegic (the Drosophila homologue of transforming growth factor beta), acted as a morphogen during the later stages of Drosophila development.

Mechanism

During early development, morphogen gradients result in the differentiation of specific cell types in a distinct spatial order. The morphogen provides spatial information by forming a concentration gradient that subdivides a field of cells by inducing or maintaining the expression of different target genes at distinct concentration thresholds. Thus, cells far from the source of the morphogen will receive low levels of morphogen and express only low-threshold target genes. In contrast, cells close to the source of morphogen will receive high levels of morphogen and will express both low- and high-threshold target genes. Distinct cell types emerge as a consequence of the different combination of target gene expression. In this way, the field of cells is subdivided into different types according to their position relative to the source of the morphogen. This model is assumed to be a general mechanism by which cell type diversity can be generated in embryonic development in animals.

Some of the earliest and best-studied morphogens are transcription factors that diffuse within early Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly) embryos. However, most morphogens are secreted proteins that signal between cells.

Genes and signals

A morphogen spreads from a localized source and forms a concentration gradient across a developing tissue.[7] In developmental biology, 'morphogen' is rigorously used to mean a signalling molecule that acts directly on cells (not through serial induction) to produce specific cellular responses that depend on morphogen concentration. This definition concerns the mechanism, not any specific chemical formula, so simple compounds such as retinoic acid (the active metabolite of retinol or vitamin A) may also act as morphogens. The model is not universally accepted due to specific issues with setting up a gradient in the tissue outlined in the French flag model[8] and subsequent work showing that the morphogen gradient of the Drosophila embryo is more complex than the simple gradient model would indicate.[9]

Examples

Proposed mammalian morphogens include retinoic acid, sonic hedgehog (SHH), transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β)/bone morphogenic protein (BMP), and Wnt/beta-catenin.[10][11] Morphogens in Drosophila include decapentaplegic and hedgehog.[10]

During development, retinoic acid, a metabolite of vitamin A, is used to stimulate the growth of the posterior end of the organism.[12] Retinoic acid binds to retinoic acid receptors that acts as transcription factors to regulate the expression of Hox genes. Exposure of embryos to exogenous retinoids especially in the first trimester results in birth defects.[11]

TGF-β family members are involved in dorsoventral patterning and the formation of some organs. Binding to TGF-β to type II TGF beta receptors recruits type I receptors causing the latter to be transphosphorylated. The type I receptors activate Smad proteins that in turn act as transcription factors that regulate gene transcription.[11]

Sonic hedgehog (SHH) are morphogens that are essential to early patterning in the developing embryo. SHH binds to the Patched receptor which in the absence of SHH inhibits the Smoothened receptor. Activated smoothened in turn causes Gli1, Gli2, and Gli3 to be translocated into the nucleus where they activate target genes such at PTCH1 and Engrailed.[11]

Fruit fly

Drosophila melanogaster has an unusual developmental system, in which the first thirteen cell divisions of the embryo occur within a syncytium prior to cellularization. Essentially the embryo remains a single cell with over 8000 nuclei evenly spaced near the membrane until the fourteenth cell division, when independent membranes furrow between the nuclei, separating them into independent cells. As a result, in fly embryos transcription factors such as Bicoid or Hunchback can act as morphogens because they can freely diffuse between nuclei to produce smooth gradients of concentration without relying on specialized intercellular signalling mechanisms. Although there is some evidence that homeobox transcription factors similar to these can pass directly through cell membranes,[13] this mechanism is not believed to contribute greatly to morphogenesis in cellularized systems.

In most developmental systems, such as human embryos or later Drosophila development, syncytia occur only rarely (such as in skeletal muscle), and morphogens are generally secreted signalling proteins. These proteins bind to the extracellular domains of transmembrane receptor proteins, which use an elaborate process of signal transduction to communicate the level of morphogen to the nucleus. The nuclear targets of signal transduction pathways are usually transcription factors, whose activity is regulated in a manner that reflects the level of morphogen received at the cell surface. Thus, secreted morphogens act to generate gradients of transcription factor activity just like those that are generated in the syncitial Drosophila embryo.

Discrete target genes respond to different thresholds of morphogen activity. The expression of target genes is controlled by segments of DNA called 'enhancers' to which transcription factors bind directly. Once bound, the transcription factor then stimulates or inhibits the transcription of the gene and thus controls the level of expression of the gene product (usually a protein). 'Low-threshold' target genes require only low levels of morphogen activity to be regulated and feature enhancers that contain many high-affinity binding sites for the transcription factor. 'High-threshold' target genes have relatively fewer binding sites or low-affinity binding sites that require much greater levels of transcription factor activity to be regulated.

The general mechanism by which the morphogen model works, can explain the subdivision of tissues into patterns of distinct cell types, assuming it is possible to create and maintain a gradient. However, the morphogen model is often invoked for additional activities such as controlling the growth of the tissue or orienting the polarity of cells within it (for example, the hairs on your forearm point in one direction) which cannot be explained by model.

Eponyms

The organizing role that morphogens play during animal development was acknowledged in the 2014 naming of a new beetle genus, Morphogenia. The type species, Morphogenia struhli, was named in honour of Gary Struhl, the US developmental biologist who was instrumental in demonstrating that the decapentaplegic and wingless genes encode proteins that function as morphogens during Drosophila development.[14]

gollark: ↑

gollark: V <@300114605408124940> You don't need many providers. They just provide energy ĪŌ.

gollark: Just deletinate 32-bit java.

gollark: Basically any remotely modern x86 CPU is.

gollark: <@451887563603574784> Almost certainly.

References

Turing, A. M. (1952). "The chemical basis of morphogenesis". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B. 237 (641): 37–72. doi:10.1098/rstb.1952.0012.
Hiscock, Tom W.; Megason, Sean G. (2015). "Orientation of Turing-like Patterns by Morphogen Gradients and Tissue Anisotropies". Cell Systems. 1 (6): 408–416. doi:10.1016/j.cels.2015.12.001. PMC 4707970. PMID 26771020.
Nüsslein-Volhard, C.; Wieschaus, E. (October 1980). "Mutations affecting segment number and polarity in Drosophila". Nature. 287 (5785): 795–801. doi:10.1038/287795a0. PMID 6776413.CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link)
Arthur, Wallace (14 February 2002). "The emerging conceptual framework of evolutionary developmental biology". Nature. 415 (6873): 757–764. doi:10.1038/415757a. PMID 11845200.
Winchester, Guil (2004). "Edward B. Lewis 1918-2004" (PDF). Current Biology (published Sep 21, 2004). 14 (18): R740–742. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2004.09.007. PMID 15380080.
"Eric Wieschaus and Christiane Nüsslein-Volhard: Collaborating to Find Developmental Genes". iBiology. Archived from the original on 13 October 2016. Retrieved 13 October 2016.
Russell, Peter (2010). iGenetics : a molecular approach. San Francisco, CA: Pearson Benjamin Cummings. p. 566. ISBN 978-0-321-56976-9.
Gordon, Natalie K.; Gordon, Richard (2016). "The organelle of differentiation in embryos: The cell state splitter". Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling. 13: 11. doi:10.1186/s12976-016-0037-2. PMC 4785624. PMID 26965444.
Roth S., Lynch J Does the Bicoid Gradient Matter? Cell, Volume 149, Issue 3, p511–512, 27 April 2012.
Kam RK, Deng Y, Chen Y, Zhao H (2012). "Retinoic acid synthesis and functions in early embryonic development". Cell & Bioscience. 2 (1): 11. doi:10.1186/2045-3701-2-11. PMC 3325842. PMID 22439772.
Moore KL, Persaud TV, Torchia MG (2013). "Common signaling pathways used during development: morphogens". The developing human: clinically oriented embryology (9th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Saunders/Elsevier. pp. 506–509. ISBN 978-1437720020.
Cunningham, T.J.; Duester, G. (2015). "Mechanisms of retinoic acid signalling and its roles in organ and limb development". Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 16 (2): 110–123. doi:10.1038/nrm3932. PMC 4636111. PMID 25560970.
Derossi D, Joliot AH, Chassaing G, Prochiantz A (April 1994). "The third helix of the Antennapedia homeodomain translocates through biological membranes". J. Biol. Chem. 269 (14): 10444–50. PMID 8144628.
Parker J (23 January 2014). "Morphogenia: a new genus of the Neotropical tribe Jubini (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Pselaphinae) from the Brazilian Amazon". ZooKeys (373): 57–66. doi:10.3897/zookeys.373.6788. PMC 3909807. PMID 24493960.