Warblog

A warblog or milblog is a weblog devoted mostly or wholly to covering news events concerning an ongoing war. Sometimes the use of the term "warblog" implies that the blog concerned has a pro-war slant.[1] The term "milblog" implies that the author is with the military.

History

The coinage 'warblog' is attributed to Matt Welch,[2][3] who started his War Blog within days of the September 11 attacks.[4] In the fall of 2001, the attacks gave rise to a "war-blogging movement,"[5] which favoured political punditry over the often personal and technological orientation that had dominated the blog genre up to that point, achieving much greater public and media recognition than earlier blogs.[5] Most warblogs supported the US-led War in Afghanistan and the Iraq War[6] from a hawkish perspective.[7]

Warblogging was popularized by Glenn Reynolds, whose Instapundit was one of the most popular political blogs on the web.[8] Some prominent warblogs, such as Little Green Footballs by Charles Johnson[9] and Daily Dish by Andrew Sullivan existed before September 11, but made the war on terror their primary focus afterwards.[10] Other notable warblogs included Dynamist by Virginia Postrel, KausFiles by Mickey Kaus, Talking Points Memo by Josh Marshall, KenLayne.com by Ken Layne,[10] and Lileks.com by James Lileks.[1]

The readership of warblogs dramatically increased in March 2003, following the U.S. invasion of Iraq, with readers chiefly attracted by the offer of perspectives absent from most news reports; the pseudonymous Salam Pax, an Iraqi national who was posting first-hand accounts from Baghdad, emerged as a prominent war blogger.[11] Media organisations that started their own reporters' warblog at this point included the BBC, the Christian Science Monitor,[12] and the Seattle Post-Intelligencer.[7] In the first half of 2003, CNN, The Hartford Courant, and Time were among the media organizations that prohibited staff reporters from covering US-led wars first-hand in their personal blogs for fear both of legal repercussions and of competition from such blogs.[13]

Most blogs that gained popularity as "warblogs" expanded their focus to politics and general news, usually from a right-of-center perspective, yet continued to be commonly known as warblogs.[5] While warblogs arose in response to the post-September-11 wars and mostly limited their commentary to them, some moved on to related political, social and cultural issues and continued after the end of the wars.

Milblogs

Military blogs emerged with the Iraq War in 2003.[14] Initially named "warblogs" as well,[15] they became popular under the name "milblogging"in 2004.[16] In October 2005, a U.S. soldier named Jean-Paul Borda launched the blog aggregator Milblogging.com.[14][17] A milblog is primarily focused on the events of the military, written about by those with inside knowledge of the military, whether an active soldier, a veteran of the military, a spouse of a soldier, or a civilian with a special connection to the military.

Milblogs often criticized the media coverage of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, seeking to correct what they saw as biased or negative reporting.[17][18] Thus, Matt Burden of Blackfive.net cites as the rationale of his blog the death in combat of a fellow soldier and good friend of his, who died saving the life of a magazine reporter, yet had his death go unreported by the magazine.[19] One milblogger chose to offer his site "as an educational service to the American People who wish to know the true story of Iraq and Afghanistan."[20] Other milblogs cite similar intentions to report the news that they did not feel the mainstream media was reporting.

C.J. Grisham was among the first active duty soldiers to become a milblogger[21] when he opened A Soldier's Perspective in December 2004.[22] Within five years, ASP was receiving an average of 1,500 visitors per day (nearly 1 million in total) from over 120 countries and was ranked the second most popular site on Milblogging.com.[23]

In 2005, there were fewer than 200 "milblogs" in existence.[24] In July 2011, Milblogging.com listed more than 3,000 military blogs in 46 countries.[25] The top 5 locations were US, Iraq, Afghanistan, the United Kingdom, and Germany.

Response by U.S. Military

Military blogs became accepted within a few years. Whereas secretary of defense Donald Rumsfeld was at first believed to be skeptical of military blogs,[14] by 2007 president George W. Bush lauded them as "an important voice for the cause of freedom."[26]

Official oversight of websites maintained by military personnel deployed to the Middle East began in 2002. The oversight mission consisted of active-duty soldiers and contractors, as well as Guard and Reserve members from Maryland, Texas and Washington state. Its remit was expanded in August 2005.[27]

In Iraq, commanding officers shut down a blog that reported on the medical response to a suicide bombing that had taken place in late 2004 in Mosul. The Army Web Risk Assessment Cell was created to monitor compliance with military regulations.[28] In April 2005, a four-page document of regulations was issued by Multi-National Corps-Iraq,[27] directing all military bloggers in Iraq to register with their units, and commanders to conduct quarterly reviews to make sure bloggers were not disclosing casualty numbers or violating operational security or privacy rules.[28] Some milbloggers took down or altered their blogs for fear of violating the regulation that many of them believed to be too ambiguous.[27] The regulations were updated in April 2007 but, according to many bloggers in war theatres, failed to resolve their ambiguities.[26]

Although the U.S. Department of Defense was initially concerned about milblogs as a potential OPSEC violation,[29] it eventually embraced the concept and attempted to implement official versions of milblogs.[30] Official milblogs did not receive the same reception or popularity of the unofficial milblogs as they were written in the same dull language as other official publications of the Defense Department.

gollark: Why is my rocket not launching?
gollark: From RFTools.
gollark: Powercells, probably.
gollark: Oh, it works now for no apparent reason, never mind.
gollark: How can I tell why an advanced carpenter isn't advanced carpenting?

See also

References

  1. Cavanaugh, Tim (2002-04-02). "Let Slip the Blogs of War". USC Annenberg Online Journalism Review. Retrieved 2016-08-04.
  2. Reynolds, Glenn (2003-02-20). "On the warpath". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 2003-03-06. Retrieved 2016-07-30.
  3. Welch, Matt (2006-04-01). "Farewell to Warblogging". Reason. Retrieved 2016-08-10.
  4. Welch, Matt (2001-09-17). "Welcome to war". War Blog. Archived from the original on 2001-09-20. Retrieved 2016-07-29.
  5. Gallagher, David F. (2002-06-10). "A Rift Among Bloggers". New York Times. Archived from the original on 2016-07-31.
  6. O'Brien, Barbara (2004). Blogging America: Political Discourse in a Digital Nation. Wilsonville: Franklin, Beedle & Associates. p. 20. ISBN 978-1-59028-040-9.
  7. Levy, Steven (2003-03-28). "Bloggers' Delight". Newsweek. Retrieved 2016-08-13.
  8. Welch, Matt (September 2003). "Blogworld: The New Amateur Journalists Weigh In". Columbia Journalism Review. 42 (3). ISSN 0010-194X. Archived from the original on 2003-12-06. Retrieved 2016-08-04.
  9. Munksgaard, Daniel (2010). "Warblog without end: Online anti-Islamic discourses as persuadables". Iowa City: University of Iowa: 38. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  10. Sullivan, Andrew (2002-02-24). "A Blogger Manifesto: Why Online Weblogs Are One Future for Journalism". The Sunday Times. London. Archived from the original on 2002-04-06.
  11. Hamilton, Anita (2003-03-30). "Best Of The War Blogs". Time. ISSN 0040-781X. Retrieved 2016-08-12.
  12. Reynolds, Glenn (2004). "The Blogs of War: How the Internet is Reshaping Foreign Policy". The National Interest (75): 59–64. ISSN 0884-9382. JSTOR 42897526.
  13. Bowman, Shayne; Willis, Chris (2003). We Media (PDF). Reston, VA: The Media Center at the American Press institute. Retrieved 2016-09-16.
  14. Dao, James (2011-05-01). "Milbloggers Hold Conference". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2016-10-27.
  15. Thompson, Garry (2003). "Weblogs, warblogs, the public sphere, and bubbles". Transformations: Journal of Media & Culture. 2003 (7). Retrieved 2016-11-03.
  16. Hewitt, Hugh (2004-03-11). "Rise of the Milblogs". Weekly Standard. Retrieved 2016-10-27.
  17. Spector, Mike (2006-07-26). "Cry Bias, and Let Slip the Blogs of War". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 2006-10-05. Retrieved 2016-10-28.
  18. Bennett, Daniel (2009-05-11). "The evolution of military blogging in the mediasphere". Frontline Club. Retrieved 2016-08-04.
  19. Burden, Matt (May 26, 2004). "Major Mathew Schram's Memorial Day". Blackfive.
  20. "About Me". War on Terror News.
  21. "Noise and Light Discipline". xbradtc.com. December 16, 2009. Retrieved January 29, 2014.
  22. "Julie Howe & CJ Grisham," PatriotWatch.com.
  23. Anderson, Jon R. (December 8, 2009). "The rise and fall of a military blogger". Military Times. Archived from the original on 2013-04-22. Retrieved January 29, 2014.
  24. Curt (September 24, 2010). "Find a successful case study and…". The Computer Whisperer. Retrieved September 18, 2016.
  25. "Search Milblogging.com's Database". Milblogging.com. 14 July 2011. Archived from the original on 14 July 2011.
  26. Schwab, Nikki (2007-05-05). "Military Bloggers Wary of New Policy". The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved 2016-11-01.
  27. Felberbaum, Michael (2006-10-29). "Army Monitors Soldiers' Blogs, Web Sites". Washington Post.
  28. Hockenberry, John (August 2005). "The Blogs of War". Wired. 13 (8). Archived from the original on 2005-08-13. Retrieved 2016-07-23.
  29. Alvarez, Steve (2006-03-02). "CENTCOM Team Engages 'Bloggers'". Defense.gov. Archived from the original on 2010-06-08. Retrieved 2016-08-05.
  30. Bennett, Daniel (2010-07-07). "Tracing the first official U.S. military blogs". Frontline Club. Retrieved 2016-08-05.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.