Micaiah

Micaiah (Hebrew: מיכיהו Mikay'hu "Who is like Yah?"[1]), son of Imlah, is a prophet in the Hebrew Bible. He is one of the four disciples of Elijah[2] and not to be confused with Micah, prophet of the Book of Micah.

For other uses, see Micaiah (disambiguation).
Micaiah's prophecy. Woodcut by Johann Christoph Weigel, 1695.

Prophecy

The events leading up to the appearance of Micaiah are illustrated in 1 Kings 22:1-12. In 1 Kings 22:1-4, Jehoshaphat, the king of Judah goes to visit the King of Israel (identified later, in 1 Kings 22:20, as Ahab), and asks if he will go with him to take over Ramoth-gilead which was under the rule of the king of Aram. Jehoshaphat the Judahite requests that Ahab the Israelite, “Inquire first for the word of the Lord” (1 Kings 22:5). Ahab then calls on his prophets and asks if he should go into battle against Ramoth-gilead. The prophets responded by telling the king of Israel to go into battle, stating that the Lord (Adonai) will deliver Ramoth-gilead into the hand of the king (1 Kings 22:6). Jehoshaphat asks if there are any other prophets of whom to inquire the word of the Lord (YHWH). Ahab mentions Micaiah the son of Imlah, but expresses dislike for him because his past (1 Kings 20:13-43) prophecies have not been in favor of him (1 Kings 22:7-8). A messenger is sent to bring Micaiah to the king to give his prophecy. The messenger tells Micaiah to give a favorable prophecy to Ahab (1 Kings 22:12-13).

Micaiah replies to the messenger that he will speak whatever the Lord says to him (1 Kings 22:14). Micaiah appears before the king of Israel, and when asked if Ahab should go into battle at Ramoth-gilead Micaiah initially responds with a similar prophecy to that of the other prophets in a mocking manner (1 Kings 22:15b). Ahab then questions Micaiah, and insists that he speak nothing but the truth in the name of the Lord. Micaiah then gives a true prophecy, in which he illustrates a meeting of Yahweh with the heavenly hosts. At this meeting Yahweh asks who will entice Ahab to go into battle so that he may perish (1 Kings 22:19-20). A spirit comes forward, and offers to “be a lying spirit in the mouth of the prophets” (1 Kings 22:22). Therefore, the prophecies of the other prophets were a result of the lying spirit. Zedekiah leader of the 400 prophets who spoke in favor of Ahab strikes Micaiah and claims God speaks through him. As a result of Micaiah's prophecy, Ahab ordered Micaiah imprisoned until he returned from battle, unharmed (1 Kings 22:27).

Perhaps concerned about the prophecy, Ahab disguised himself in battle rather than lead his troops openly as their king. However, Ahab was killed in battle after being struck by a randomly shot arrow. Micaiah's prophecy was fulfilled, contrary to the word of 400 false prophets, all of whom encouraged Ahab to attack with a prediction of victory.

This account is also recorded in 2 Chronicles, Chapter 18.

Interpretation

Rabbinical interpretation

The Babylonian Talmud (b.Sanhedrin 89a) accepts that the scene literally occurred in heaven. Against this Judah Halevi (Kuzari 3.73) considered the "prophecy" to be an example of the prophet's own rhetoric.[3] This rhetoric is clear from the contrast of syntax used for the divinition: "the word of Y-H-V-H" and "the spirit of Y-H-V-H" (2 Chronicles 18:23, 27).[4] David Kimhi argues that "prophecy is true by definition", the spirit of Lord is often represented as an irrational and emotional response unlike the word of Lord, and following Judah Halevi also critically assesses that Micaiah might have himself presented the vivid scene, using poetic dramatization to frighten and convince Ahab - "not that he saw these things, nor did he hear them."[5] "On 1 Kgs 22: 19-23, Radak adopts a bolder strategy to avoid a rational dilemma that never distressed the Rabbis. In that passage, the prophet Micaiah, responding to Ahab's false prophets who predicted military success against Aram, describes a vision of God sending a "lying spirit" to mislead the king. Radak rejects the rabbinic view (b. Sanh. 89 a) that this scene occurred in heaven, arguing that God could not have sent false prophecy, since "prophecy is true by definition". ... Instead, he argues that Micaiah actually fabricated this vivid scene, using poetic dramatization (divre meliza . . . derekh haza'at devarim) to frighten and thereby prevail upon Ahab." [6] Pseudo-Epiphanius ("Opera," ii. 245) makes Micah an Ephraimite. Confounding him with Micaiah, son of Imlah (I Kings xxii. 8 et seq.), he states that Micah, for his inauspicious prophecy, was killed by order of Ahab through being thrown from a precipice, and was buried at Morathi (Maroth?; Mic. i. 12), near the cemetery of Enakim (Ένακεὶμ Septuagint rendering of ; ib. i. 10). According to "Gelilot Ereẓ Yisrael" (quoted in "Seder ha-Dorot," i. 118, Warsaw, 1889), Micah was buried in Chesil, a town in southern Judah (Josh. xv. 30).[7] Naboth's soul was the lying spirit that was permitted to deceive Ahab to his death[8]

Modern scholarly interpretation

Micaiah prophesies as though he was present at the meeting between Yahweh and the heavenly hosts. Michael Coogan of Harvard compares the prophecy of Micaiah to that of several other prophets, including Isaiah's vision of the Divine Council (Isaiah 6:1-8).[9] In Jeremiah 23, Yahweh warns against false prophecies. However, Coogan argues that unlike Isaiah 6 and Jeremiah 23, in 1 Kings 22 Yahweh's actions to allow false prophecy to be given are deliberate and intentional. It appears as though Yahweh has an ulterior motive, and that is for Ahab to die, in this case at the battle at Ramoth-gilead.[10]

R. W. L. Moberly of Durham University discusses Micaiah's prophecy in “Does God Lie to His Prophets? The Story of Micaiah ben Imlah as a Test Case.” In his article, Moberly discusses Hebrew prophecy as “relational, engaging language that seeks a response.” [11] Moberly calls into question the honesty of Yahweh particularly in relation to integrity and the concept of loving and forgiving God.[12] He suggests that for the Deuteronomistic Historians who were the compilers of the text, the compassion of Yahweh is delivered by challenging and engaging the human will for repentance or bringing forth change or obduracy.[13] Dependency dynamics and will of the Lord rooted in foreknowledge is revealed in 1 Kings 21:27-29

Fundamentalist Christian Interpretation

Micaiah's vision of the lying spirit (demon) in 1 Kings 22:1- 40 along with Jeremiah's prophecy about Hananiah (Jeremiah ch 28), Elijah's fire from Heaven test (1 Kings 18: 16- 46) and the statement from Jesus Christ that he was or is the only way to Heaven (John 14:6) are used together to support the doctrine that Christianity is the only true and correct religion and that all other religions are false.

This doctrine is supported today through Fundamentalist books such as Chris Kline's book "A Brilliant Deception" (1990).

Heavenly throne room

The prophecy is probably the earliest example in the Hebrew Bible of a representation of a heavenly throne room. It is not clear whether the heavenly throne room represents Micaiah's own belief or a depiction of Ahab's court prophets without discrediting them entirely like the prophet Zedekiah ben Chenaanah, who struck him after his non-populist prophecy (1 Kings 22:24). The focus of voice from the heavenly throne is concerned for the people while Ahab the earthly king's response is self-centered, it reflects the difference in the both approaches, a characteristic of post-exile exemplification in the scripture.[14][15]

gollark: Or they would magically work from the stuff in the air, and then need lots of power.
gollark: You would still need to eat things as feedstock for the food fabricators, too.
gollark: They will switch to "constantly on at maximum power".
gollark: Except all this will inevitably offload to the C L O U D and fail when that goes down.
gollark: "It nanofabricates bread and toasts it before you even say you want bread!"

References
  1. Peter J. Leithart 1 & 2 Kings 2006 - Page 161 "Pressed by Jehoshaphat, Ahab reluctantly brings Micaiah, whose name means “who is like Yah?"
  2. J. D., Eisenstein, Otzar Midrashim, vol.1 (New York: Noble, 1915), p. 173. Hupat Etivahu, part four, number 47
  3. M. Z. Cohen Three Approaches to Biblical Metaphor: From Abraham Ibn Ezra and ... 2003 -Page 159 "This role emerges in Radak's comment on I Kgs 22:20, where the prophet Micaiah describes a vision of God on His throne ... Not insignificantly, Radak's (unnamed) source here is Judah ha-Levi (Kuzari 3:73), the poet-philosopher who formed a link between Moses Ibn Ezra and Abraham Ibn Ezra (above, p. 49). Speaking from the Andalusian poetic perspective .."
  4. Zucker, David J., The prophet Micaiah in Kings and Chronicles. Jewish Bible Quarterly. Jul-Sep 2013, Vol. 41 Issue 3, p. 156-162.
  5. Magne Saebo Hebrew Bible, Old Testament: The History of Its Interpretation. 2000, Page 400
  6. Footnote 39: "Radak's (unnamed) as qtd. in Judah Halevi, Kuzari 3.73."
  7. Micah Jewish Encyclopedia
  8. Aish.com The Lying spirt which deceived Ahab
  9. Coogan, M. A Brief Introduction to the Old Testament: The Hebrew Bible in its Context. (Oxford University Press: Oxford 2009), p. 247.
  10. Coogan, M. A Brief Introduction to the Old Testament: The Hebrew Bible in its Context. (Oxford University Press: Oxford 2009), p. 248.
  11. Moberly, R.W.L. “Does God Lie to His Prophets? The Story of Micaiah ben Imlah as a Test Case.” The Harvard Theological Review 96, no. 1 (January 2003): p8.
  12. Moberly, R.W.L. “Does God Lie to His Prophets? The Story of Micaiah ben Imlah as a Test Case.” The Harvard Theological Review 96, no. 1 (January 2003): p8.
  13. Moberly, R.W.L. “Does God Lie to His Prophets? The Story of Micaiah ben Imlah as a Test Case.” The Harvard Theological Review 96, no. 1 (January 2003): pp 11-12.
  14. Moberly, R.W.L. “Does God Lie to His Prophets? The Story of Micaiah ben Imlah as a Test Case.” The Harvard Theological Review 96, no. 1 (January 2003): p6-8.
  15. Mordechai Cogan, 1 Kings: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary, Anchor-Yale, Doubleday, 2001
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.