Megaponera

Megaponera analis is the sole species of the genus Megaponera.[1] They are a strictly termite-eating (termitophagous) ponerine ant species widely distributed in Sub-Saharan Africa[2] and most commonly known for their column-like raiding formation when attacking termite feeding sites. Their sophisticated raiding behaviour gave them the common name Matabele ant after the Matabele tribe, fierce warriors who overwhelmed various other tribes during the 1800s.[3] At nearly 20 millimetres (0.79 in) in length, M. analis is one of the world's largest ants.[4][5]

Megaponera analis
A major worker with termite prey
Scientific classification
Kingdom:
Animalia
Phylum:
Arthropoda
Class:
Insecta
Order:
Hymenoptera
Family:
Formicidae
Subfamily:
Ponerinae
Tribe:
Ponerini
Genus:
Megaponera
Species:
M. analis
Binomial name
Megaponera analis
(Latreille, 1802)
Distribution

      Present in country       Likely present in country       Absent from country

Synonyms

Taxonomy

Megaponera is a genus of ponerine ant first defined by Gustav Mayr in 1862 for Formica analis[6] (Latreille, 1802), the sole species belonging to the genus to date. In 1994 William L. Brown, Jr. synonymised the genus under Pachycondyla even though he lacked phylogenetic justification, thereby changing the name from Megaponera foetens to Pachycondyla analis.[7] In 2014 Schmidt and Shattuck revived Megaponera back to full genus status due to both molecular and morphological evidence. Since foetens was just a specific epithet incorrectly used throughout the literature the new name for the species as of June 2014 is Megaponera analis.[1]

Subspecies of Megaponera analis

Due to its very wide distribution throughout Africa, it is likely that there are many more subspecies of M. analis than those recognised at the moment – some of which may warrant elevation to full species status.

The five currently recognised subspecies of M. analis are:[1]

Morphology
Minor worker
Major worker
Queen with enlarged gaster

The size of worker ants varies between 5–18 millimetres (0.20–0.71 in), with larger workers making up to 50 percent of the colony.[8] Though it was often suggested that the larger ants also function as gamergates,[9] they were never observed laying fertile eggs, a function solely reserved to the ergatoid queen.[5] Even though M. analis is often referred to as dimorphic, with a major and minor caste, they actually exhibit polyphasic allometry in worker sizes. The variations among the ants are mostly in size and pubescence (with minors having less), although differences in the mandibles have also been observed, with minors having smoother mandibles compared to majors.[4]

Range and habitat

Megaponera analis occurs throughout sub-Saharan Africa from 25° S to 12° N.[2] Its nests are generally subterranean, up to 0.7 metres (2 ft 4 in) deep, and often located next to trees, rocks, or abandoned termite hills.[10] While the nest itself may have more than one entrance, it comprises only one chamber in which the eggs, larvae, cocoons, and the queen are located.[11]

Behaviour
An M. analis raiding column

Raiding behaviour
Megaponera analis ants breaking up the protective soil layer of a termite feeding site

The raiding activity of M. analis focuses on dawn and dusk between 6:00–10:00 and 15:00–19:00,[11][12] with approximately three to five raids occurring per day. There are also observations of a third raiding activity window during the night between 22:00–2:00, although this phase has been poorly studied.[10] Megaponera analis raids focus solely on termites from the subfamily Macrotermitinae and generally consist of 200 to 500 ants.[8]

The general foraging pattern of M. analis starts with scout ants searching an area of approximately 50 m (160 ft) around the nest for termite foraging sites. This searching phase can last up to one hour, and if it is unsuccessful the scout returns to the nest by a circuitous route. If a scout ant finds a potential site, it will start to investigate it without getting into contact with the termites or entering the galleries, before returning by the quickest route to recruit its nestmates to conduct a raid.[8] While the quickest route is often also the shortest, this is not always the case. Scouts have been observed to use deviations on open terrain (like paths) on which they can run twice as fast to reduce travel time on average by 35%.[13]

Although the scout ant is observed to lay a pheromone trail on the return journey to the nest, the other ants seem to be unable to follow this trail without the help of the scout.[10] The scout ant therefore leads the raid from the front, with the other ants following in a column-like formation.[14] Recruitment time varies between 60 and 300 seconds, with all castes taking part in a raid. During the outward journey towards the termites, all ants are laying a pheromone trail, making it much easier for them to find their way back to the nest later without having to rely on the scout ant.[15]

Approximately 20–50 cm (7.9–19.7 in) before contact with the termites, the raiding column stops and agglomerates until all the ants in the column have arrived, forming a sort of circle around the raid leader (the scout). Afterwards the ants rush forward towards the termites in an open formation and overwhelm their prey. During the attack, a division of labour can be observed. While the majors focus mostly on breaking up the protective layer over the foraging galleries of the termites, the minors rush into the galleries to kill the termites through the created openings.[8] After a foraging site has been exploited, the ants congregate at the same place they waited earlier, with the majors carrying the termites, and return to the nest in a column-like formation. These raids are always a single event and ants do not return independently to re-exploit a former raiding site, although the possibility of the scout ant remembering a site and reinvestigating it in the future for a possible second raid cannot be excluded.[16]

Colony size and reproduction
Megaponera analis male

Colony size varies, depending on the location and age of the colony, from 440 to 2300 adult ants.[4] Little is known about the reproduction of M. analis. The alate males of M. analis are often observed leaving and entering the nests of established colonies by using pheromone trails from previous raids as guides to the nest.[17] Since M. analis colonies are obligate termite hunters, a queen could not establish a nest on her own, since she could not conduct a raid against termites without a standing army of worker ants. It is therefore assumed that new colonies are always created through colony fission, with the new queen taking a number of the workers of the old colony with her to create a new colony.[5]

Helping Behaviour

Cooperative self defence

While cooperative defence of the nest is well known in ants,[5] cooperative self-defence outside of the nest is much less so. When M. analis ants are attacked by driver ants (Dorylus sp.) outside of the nest, they cooperate with one another in an attempt to defend themselves by checking each other's extremities for enemy ants and removing any that are clinging to their legs or antennae.[18]

Saving injured individuals

During the battle against termites some of the ants get injured. The termite soldiers are able to bite off extremities or cling on to the ant body after their death. These ants have evolved a unique mechanism to deal with this increased foraging cost. After the battle injured ants "call" for help with a pheromone in their mandibular gland (consisting of two chemical compounds: Dimethyl disulfide and Dimethyl trisulfide). This attracts nestmates which then start to investigate the injured nestmate and pick her up. By carrying these injured ants back they reduce their mortality by 32% to close to zero. Inside the nest the clinging termites get removed. In case they lost one or two legs the ants adapt to a four or five legged locomotion to compensate for it, allowing them to reach running speeds similar to a healthy ant. These injured ants are then capable again of performing colony tasks and are even observed in future raids against termites. A model calculated the value of this rescue behaviour to allow a colony to be 28.7% larger than a colony that would not show this behaviour (due to the energy saving by not having to replace the injured workers with new healthy replacements). This is the only invertebrate species known to show such a behaviour towards injured individuals.[19]

The rescue behaviour is also limited to only lightly injured ants (loss of 1-2 limbs), heavily injured ants (that have lost 5 limbs) are left behind on the hunting ground. The mechanism with which this is regulated is believed to be relatively simple and based on a two step process. After an ant was injured the first step is trying to stand up on its legs again and return to a resting position. Step two then is to call for help and cooperate with the attracted helpers. If step one cannot be achieved step two does not occur. Heavily injured ants are therefore in a constant loop trying to achieve step one, making it a very simple mechanism of only rescuing ants that are still useful for the colony.[20]

Injured ant (termite bites) being investigated by nestmate at the hunting ground
Injured ant being carried back to the nest

Treatment of injured ants
Megaponera analis ant treating the wound of an injured nestmate in the nest

Observations inside the nest have revealed that these ants treat the wounds of their injured nest-mates, making them the first recorded non-human species to consistently take care of the wounds of other individuals. Nest mates grab the damaged limb of the injured ant in their mandibles and hold it in place with their front legs. They then start to "lick" the wound for numerous minutes. This treatment occurs predominantly within the first hour after injury. The typical mortality rate of injured ants is 80% of the cases, likely due to an infection. With treatment, mortality is reduced to 10%. There remains to be a consensus on whether or not this treatment is purely prophylactic (cleaning of the injury and removing debris/dirt) or actually medical (like applying antibiotic substances to fight off an infection).[20]

See also:

Megaponera analis pictures from Comoé National Park, Ivory Coast
  • A major carries its queen during a colony fission
  • A major kills a Macrotermes bellicosus termite soldier during a raid
  • A major carries Macrotermes bellicosus termite soldiers back to the nest, with minors walking next to it
  • A raiding party collecting Pseudocanthotermes militaris termites after a successful raid
  • A migration with ants carrying larvae and cocoons
  • A major worker guarding a cocoon outside the nest
gollark: Yes, I wanted to use it for purposes.
gollark: Does coral know, or do they just have a better bruteforcer?
gollark: Sad!
gollark: OH BEE did ubq actually work out the comparator?
gollark: We had euapioduofluoropseudochromohazard before.

References
  1. Schmidt, C.A.; Shattuck, S. O. (18 June 2014). "The Higher Classification of the Ant Subfamily Ponerinae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), with a Review of Ponerine Ecology and Behavior". Zootaxa. 3817 (1): 1–242. doi:10.11646/zootaxa.3817.1.1. PMID 24943802.
  2. Wheeler, William Morton (1936). "Ecological Relations of Ponerine and Other Ants to Termites". Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. 71 (3): 159–243. doi:10.2307/20023221. JSTOR 20023221.
  3. Wilson, Edward O. (2014). A Window on Eternity: A Biologist's Walk Through Gorongosa National Park. Simon & Schuster. p. 83. ISBN 978-1476747415.
  4. Villet, Martin H. (1990). "Division of labour in the Matabele ant Megaponera foetens (Fabr.) (Hymenoptera Formicidae)". Ethology Ecology & Evolution. 2 (4): 397–417. doi:10.1080/08927014.1990.9525400.
  5. Hölldobler, Bert; Wilson, Edward O. (1990). The Ants. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. ISBN 9780674040755.
  6. Mayr, G. (1862). "Myrmecologische Studien". Verh. K-K. Zool.-Bot. Ges. Wien 12: 649–776 (page 714, Megaponera; (diagnosis in key) as genus; Megaponera in Ponerinae [Poneridae])
  7. Bolton, B. (1994). Identification guide to the ant genera of the world. Harvard University Press. pp. 222. ISBN 0-674-44280-6.
  8. Longhurst, C.; Howse, P. E. (1979). "Foraging, recruitment and emigration in Megaponera foetens (Fab.) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from the Nigerian Guinea Savanna". Insectes Sociaux. 26 (3): 204–215. doi:10.1007/BF02223798.
  9. Crewe, R. M.; Peeters, C. P.; Villet, M. (1984). "Frequency distribution of worker sizes in Megaponera foetens". South African Journal of Zoology. 19 (3): 247–248. doi:10.1080/02541858.1984.11447886. ISSN 0254-1858.
  10. Yusuf, Abdullahi A. (2010). Termite raiding by the ponerine ant Pachycondyla analis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) (Ph.D.). University of Pretoria.
  11. Lepage, M. G. (1981). "Étude de la prédation de Megaponera foetens (F.) sur les populations récoltantes de Macrotermitinae dans un ecosystème semi-aride (Kajiado-Kenya)". Insectes Sociaux. 28 (3): 247–262. doi:10.1007/BF02223627.
  12. Levieux, Jean (1966). "Note préliminaire sur les colonnes de chasse de Megaponera fœtens F. (Hyménoptère Formicidæ)". Insectes Sociaux. 13 (2): 117–126. doi:10.1007/BF02223567.
  13. Frank, E.; Hönle, P.; Linsenmair, K. (2018). "Time optimized path-choice in the termite hunting ant Megaponera analis". Journal of Experimental Biology. 221 (13): jeb174854. doi:10.1242/jeb.174854.
  14. Bayliss, J.; Fielding, A. (2002). "Termitophagous foraging by Pachycondyla analis (Formicidae, Ponerinae) in a Tanzanian coastal dry forest" (PDF). Sociobiology. 39: 103–122. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-06-04. Retrieved 2014-10-21.
  15. Hölldobler, Bert; Braun, Ulrich; Gronenberg, Wulfila; Kirchner, Wolfgang H.; Peeters, Christian (1994). "Trail communication in the ant Megaponera foetens (Fabr.) (Formicidae, Ponerinae)". Journal of Insect Physiology. 40 (7): 585–593. doi:10.1016/0022-1910(94)90145-7.
  16. Longhurst, C.; Baker, R.; Howse, P. E. (1979). "Termite predation by Megaponera foetens (FAB.) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)". Journal of Chemical Ecology. 5 (5): 703–719. doi:10.1007/BF00986555.
  17. Longhurst, C.; Howse, P. E. (1979). "Some Aspects of the Biology of the Males of Megaponera Foetens (Fab.) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)". Insectes Sociaux. 26 (2): 85–91. doi:10.1007/BF02223502.
  18. Beck, J.; Kunz, K. (2007). "Cooperative self-defence: Matabele ants (Pachycondyla analis) against African driver ants (Dorylus sp.; Hymenoptera: Formicidae)". Myrmecological News. 10: 27–28.
  19. Frank, Erik Thomas; Schmitt, Thomas; Hovestadt, Thomas; Mitesser, Oliver; Stiegler, Jonas; Linsenmair, Karl Eduard (12 April 2017). "Saving the injured: Rescue behavior in the termite-hunting ant Megaponera analis". Science Advances. 3 (4): e1602187. doi:10.1126/sciadv.1602187. PMC 5389746. PMID 28439543.
  20. Frank, Erik Thomas; Wehrhahn, Marten; Linsenmair, Karl Eduard (14 February 2018). "Wound treatment and selective help in a termite-hunting ant". Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 285 (1872): 20172457. doi:10.1098/rspb.2017.2457. PMC 5829198. PMID 29445019.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.