Maternity leave in the United States

Maternity leave in the United States is regulated by US labor law. The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA) requires 12 weeks of unpaid leave annually for mothers of newborn or newly adopted children if they work for a company with 50 or more employees. Additionally, several states have adopted laws extending the requirements of FMLA to smaller companies. For the majority of US workers at companies with fewer than 50 employees, there is no legal right to paid or unpaid leave to care for a new child or recover from childbirth. Studies show the current laws disproportionately impact minorities and low-income women, who are less likely to take unpaid leave.[1]

This is below the 16-week minimum recommended by the World Health Organization.[2] The United States is one of the only countries in the world, and the only OECD member, that has not passed laws requiring businesses and corporations to offer paid maternity leave to their employees.[3] As of 2017, there had been no significant change in the proportion of women who received maternity leave in the past 20 years.[4]

The presence of strong labor unions and Democratic control of state houses increases the likelihood that state legislatures support parental leave legislation.[5]

History

Between 1961 and 1965, only 14% of mothers participated in the workforce within 6 months of their child's birth.[6] During the same time period, only 44% of mothers worked during their pregnancy.[7]

Prior to the enactment of FMLA legislation in 1993, maternity leave coverage was governed by state law, collective bargaining agreements and employer policies.[8] The first set of maternity leave related policies emerged after World War I when first wave feminists lobbied for a women's health bill that gave grants to states to provide healthcare for women and children.[9] By 1969, five states had enacted Temporary Disability Insurance laws protecting employees from income loss in the occurrence of a temporary medical disability.[10] Under this legislation, new mothers were granted leaves corresponding to the benefits that other employees received for temporary illness or disability. Changes to the federal tax code in 1976 permitted working families with a dependent child to take a tax credit on child care costs.  In 1978, the Pregnancy and Discrimination Act (PDA) prohibited employers from treating a woman unfavorably because of pregnancy, childbirth, or a medical condition related to pregnancy or childbirth.[11] During a landmark case in 1987, California Federal Savings and Loan Association v. Guerra, upheld a California law requiring most employers to grant pregnant women 4 months of unpaid disability leave and the right to return to their same job.[12] This state-level trend of maternity leave legislation continued into the 1970s and 1980s where multiple other states passed more explicit recognitions of new mothers' rights to a temporary leave of absence. Ultimately, 12 states and the District of Columbia had implemented measures requiring at least some private sector employers to offer maternity leave packages to its employees.[8] Even in the absence of this formal legislation, employees in other states often obtained maternity leave through collective bargaining. Employees frequently held enough bargaining power to influence employer policies and negotiate for the inclusion of maternity leave protection.

Despite some localized employees' access to maternity leave, there was growing pressure for national maternity leave legislation in the early 1990s. Many new mothers continued to be excluded from such maternity leave provisions despite growing national demand. Women now enjoyed greater employment opportunities and changing gender norms that encouraged increased labor involvement. This increased female employment extended to mothers as well who now were now more likely to engage in the workforce even if they had a young child. The labor participation rate of mothers with children under the age of 1 rose from 31% in 1976 to 54% in 1992.[13] The contribution of women's earnings to her family income rose from 26.6% in 1970 to 36% in 2008.[14] In spite of a high labor force participation rate, only an estimated 40% of working women had access to explicit maternity leave protection. This inadequate national coverage provoked intense protest and growing national consensus on the value of maternity leave. Ultimately, the increased salience and galvanized national support prompted the 1993 enactment of the Family and Medical Leave Act mandating maternity leave.

Although the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 required employers to guarantee job-protected, unpaid leave up to 12 weeks after the birth or adoption of a new child, an estimated 41 percent of employees in the United States were not covered by the Family and Medical Leave Act in 2012.[15] Nearly ⅔ of mothers had to work during their pregnancies between 2002-2008.[16] By 2016, only 14% of US workers had access to paid family leave as an employee benefit. About two-thirds of employees (68 percent) had access to paid sick leave, and 38 percent had access to short-term disability benefits.[17] Prior to FMLA, the term “family” referred to a nuclear family where with two parents of opposite sex and the “mother” could bear a child. This was the only definition acknowledged by medical and economic research done before the LGBTQ rights movement. Only recently, studies have caught up to a modern and more inclusive definition family.

Current legislation

In the U.S. parents and family are federally protected under The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA)[18] to go on maternity or family leave after the adoption or birth of a child.[19] Under this law, legal parents are protected for up to 12 weeks of unpaid leave (per year). The FMLA ensures the job security of parents/employees but does not protect employees who go on paid leave with their employers. Receiving the correct payment from being on leave is between the firm and the employee.[20] However, some states have laws that do protect and guarantee employees for paid family leave (see State Legislation section). Additionally, the FMLA defines “parents” as biological, adoptive, step or foster parent who stood in loco parentis or “in the place of a parent”. Parents do not include parent-in-laws though.[21]

This paragraph is for employees who are seeking to get paid using their firm's extended policies on leaves. If you choose to go on maternity or family leave, The Employee's Guide to Family and Medical Leave Act,[22] states that you can sometimes use your unspent sick time, vacation time, personal time, etc., saved up with your employer at the same time of your FMLA leave so that you continue to get paid. Importantly though, in order to use such leave, “you must follow your employer’s normal leave rules such as submitting a leave form or providing advance notice. Even if you don’t want to use your paid leave, your employer can require you to use it during your FMLA leave”.[23]

If you are choosing to use the FMLA to go on regular unpaid leave without any extended or paid leave, it's important to know the qualifications beforehand. The FMLA actually has several limiting stipulations and leaves out certain employee's conditions such as temp workers and trans employees, so only certain employees are eligible. In order to receive maternity leave protections under FMLA, employees must:[19]

  • work for a covered employer;
  • have worked 1,250 hours during the 12 months prior to the start of leave; (special hours of service rules apply to airline flight crew members)[24]
  • work at a location where the employer has 50 or more employees within 75 miles; and
  • have worked for the employer for 12 months.

The 12 months of employment are not required to be consecutive in order for the employee to qualify for FMLA leave. In general, only employment within seven years is counted unless the break in service is (1) due to an employee's fulfillment of military obligations, or (2) governed by a collective bargaining agreement or other written agreement.

The FMLA is the only law that federally protects American employees who go on maternity or family leave their resumed job security. It was signed into law during President Bill Clinton's first term in 1993 and revised on February 23, 2015 to include same-sex parents and spouses.[18] Two other Federal laws, the Pregnancy Discrimination Act[25] (PDA) and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act's (PPACA, also known as the Affordable Care Act, the ACA or Obamacare)[26] amendment of the Fair Labor Standards Act,[27] provide some additional protection for parents on the birth of a child. For instance, the PDA upholds maternity leave by arguing that employees who give temporarily disabled folks a disability leave should give pregnant women maternity leave with the same protections and benefits. This PDA is essentially arguing that pregnant women should have rights to the same paid of unpaid leave that temporarily disabled workers are afforded by their employers. If an employer offers this protection to temporarily disabled workers then PDA says that pregnant women should also be protected using the same processes and same benefits. Additionally, in 2014 the PPACA amendment to the Fair Labor Standards Act made it so that all insurance companies had to include maternity coverage in individual insurance plans. Therefore, filling the gap for unemployed women with individual insurance coverage plans to be able to afford the prenatal and postnatal pregnancy care that they need to have a healthy baby. Maternity care came to include:[26]

  • Outpatient services, such as prenatal and postnatal doctor visits, gestational diabetes screenings, lab studies, medications, etc.
  • Inpatient services, such as hospitalization, physician fees, etc.
  • Newborn baby care
  • Lactation counseling and breast-pump rental

These federal laws and amendments have increased accessibility and quality of care for prenatal and postnatal mothers and families. For example, before the Affordable Care Act, only 12% of insurance plans sold in the individual market included maternity coverage.[26] Also, according to a journal study on FMLA by researchers at the University of Maryland,[28] it was found that mothers who benefitted from FMLA were returned to the same job and sooner than before FMLA thus showing the impact of job stability for mothers. Nonetheless, many employees are still ineligible for the FMLA. According to the Family and Medical Leave Report in 2012, only 59% of American employees were eligible under the FMLA.[29] Additionally, employees who returned after FMLA, women exclusively, were given lower wages than the ones to when they left. This comes from the same study by researchers at the University of Maryland, as aforementioned. It should be said that these lower wages may have not been permanent since the study only went to highlight women's experience with maternity leave two years after they leave.

In recent polls from 2017, Democrats and Republicans both are in high support of federal funding for paid maternity and family leave. According to a study done by the Brookings Institution,[30] a non-profit think tank in D.C., 71% of Republicans and 83% of Democrats support for a paid leave policy. Although the study did not reach a particular compromise on how the policies should work, who should pay for it, how much, and other concerns that might factor into creating a universal paid parental leave policy, they did reach a conclusion. Amongst the diverse group of researchers with different political and economic views, everyone believed that it is worthwhile to consider a federal paid leave policy. One important reason for this is because “The US is the only advanced country that provides no public support to new parents”.

The U.S. does not presently have a federal paid maternity and family leave act. Some states, however, do include paid leave legislation for family members. States like California, New Jersey, and New York have pioneered paid leave legislature in their respective states. Reasons for paid leave might include higher job security for women and to reduce women's need for public assistance. A study by the Institute for Women's Research[31] has also shown that paid leave could reduce employer costs and lead to U.S. economic growth. Also, paid family leave has been shown to increase the health of the family by lowering infant mortality rates.[32] Paid family leave would also allow low-income families the ability to take care of their family members without having to sacrifice time and money. Reasons for not having a protected paid family leave policy in place might be justified by the fact that there are limited economic resources to sustain a program.[33] Additionally, some may disagree with the overreach of the government taking on the responsibility to keep families afloat while on leave. Compared to some other countries, the U.S. remains behind in terms of maternity leave legislature.[34]

State legislation

Many states have supplemented these federal regulations and provided more extensive maternity leave benefits, including expanding paid or flexible sick time, expanding access for workers in smaller companies or with less time on the job, right to pump that expands on federal law, and pregnancy accommodations.[1]

As of 2016, 12 states have enacted no additional laws or programs to support family leave before or after birth.[1] Fourteen states, along with the District of Columbia, have addressed eligibility requirements by lowering the firm-size threshold from 50 or more employees down to as low as 10 employees. Seven other states, in addition to the District of Columbia, have adopted more generous maternity leave lengths that allow longer absences for the purpose of child rearing. Moreover, some states have enacted legislation enhancing the benefits of leave programs.

California, New Jersey, and Rhode Island for instance, operate programs that require private-sector employers to pay their employees who utilize maternity leave at partial replacement rates.[35] New York passed paid family leave legislation, which includes maternity leave, in 2016 — starting off at 8 weeks and 50% of pay in 2018, and reaching 12 weeks and 67% of pay in 2021.[36]

Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and the District of Columbia designate childbirth as a temporary disability thus guaranteeing mothers paid maternity leave through Disability Insurance (TDI) provisions.[37]

On Dec. 31, 2019, New Mexico Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham signed an executive order installing paid family leave for state employees, the first such policy in the state. The order, providing 12 weeks of paid family leave for state employees under the Governor's direct purview, became effective January 1, 2020.

Other federal policies

The Department of Defense has regulated the amount of maternity leave a military member can take. Before February 5, 2016 the leave was six weeks long for active duty members or reservists who had previously done twelve months of active duty time.[38][39] On January 28, 2016, the Defense Secretary, Ashton Carter, increased the paid maternity leave to twelve weeks for all branches.[39] Traditional reservists, however, are given an eighty-four-day excusal, not leave.[40]

In the United States Air Force AFI36-3003, it states that the maternity leave starts after being released from the hospital from giving birth, as also defined for other branches. "Shared benefits" can be created if both parents are active Air Force members.[41] Therefore, a sum of up to twelve weeks can be taken by one parent or distributed amongst the two parents. However, two married active duty members cannot create "shared benefits" in the Army, according to the Army Directive 2016-09 (Maternity Leave Policy).[40]

There was a stance by the previous Secretary of the Navy, Ray Mabus, to increase the maternity leave from six to eighteen weeks for the Navy and Marine Corps beginning on July 2, 2015.[42] It was implemented until January 28, 2016, however, it remained eighteen weeks for those who were pregnant previous to and on March 3, 2016.[43]

It was a significant leap to go from six to twelve weeks of maternity leave. Other benefits have also been increased to improve the lives of those with newborn or newly adopted children. These benefits include an increase of child care hours to fourteen hours a day, and allowing active duty members more ability to family plan by paying for the sperm and egg freezing.[39] These decisions were made by the previous Defense Secretary "in an effort to support military families, improve retention and strengthen the force of the future."[39]

On December 20, 2019, as part of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2020,[44] the Federal Employee Paid Leave Act (FEPLA) amended the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) to grant federal government employees up to 12 weeks of paid time off for the birth, adoption or foster of a new child.[45] The law applies to births or placements occurring on or after October 1, 2020.[46]

Impacts of United States maternity leave

Health

Child health and development

Longer maternity leave (up to 25 weeks) is associated with a reduction in post-neonatal and child mortality.[47][16] A 2017 study found that there was almost a 50% reduction in the probability of infant rehospitalization when women took maternity leave that was partially and fully paid.[16] According to data from the 2006–2010 U.S. National Survey of Family Growth, paid maternity leave of 3 or more months for employed mothers is associated with a higher chance of the mother starting breastfeeding and breastfeeding her child at six months.[48] The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) currently recommends six months of breastfeeding exclusively, and continued breastfeeding as foods are introduced for one year for its medical and neurodevelopmental benefits for the child.[49] Mothers who are not engaged in employment may be more able to participate in consistent breast-feeding, since maternal employment can interfere with breastfeeding.[48] The Center for Disease Control and Prevention states asthma, obesity, Sudden infant death syndrome, type 2 diabetes, gastrointestinal infections, and certain infections are all less likely to occur in breastfed babies.[50][51] Research suggests that breast-feeding has the ability to yield substantial child health improvements in disease prevention and immune system build-up.[52] Moreover, further evidence indicates that maternal care is especially crucial during the first couple of months following child birth, or the time in which American maternity leave is in effect.[53] Finally, evidence shows that paid maternity leave plans can increase paternal involvement in child care as shown by California's state paid maternity leave program.[54]

Maternal health

The medical definition of postpartum is the time frame between childbirth and the return of the mother's reproductive organs to their non pregnant state.[55] For women that return to work during this postpartum period, the stress of maintaining a balance between their professional and parenting responsibilities has been shown to weaken their immune systems and interact poorly with their psychological state.[56] Lower rates of breastfeeding may also have negative effects on the mother's health, as breastfeeding lowers the possibility of breast cancer, ovarian cancer, type 2 diabetes, and heart disease for the mother.[50] Women of color and women classified as high economic hardship report postpartum symptoms more frequently and for a longer duration than women not in these categories. This trend is observed with both physical and mental health symptoms.[57] Maternity leave over a longer time period is associated with an increase in the health of both the mother and the child. Paid leave with a duration of over 12 weeks is correlated with a decrease in the risk of infant and maternal re-hospitalization.[16] According to a study on mothers of 6-month old infants using data from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, mothers who worked more hours experienced higher levels of depressive symptoms and stress due to parenting. They also viewed their personal health as worse when they worked more hours in the time period after childbirth.[58] Maternal-infant separation may cause significant parental stress, depression, and anxiety. Researchers propose paid leave relates to health as it allows women to recover from childbirth and take care of themselves, attend to their infant, visit the hospital for prenatal checkups, wellness, and illness, and manage finances.[59]

Postpartum depression

Among other factors, pregnancy can be a cause of depression in women. Symptoms of postpartum depression include a loss of interest in activities, difficulty focusing, thinking, making decisions, and remembering things, anxiety, irritation, slowed speaking, physical pains, and feelings of sadness and worthlessness.[60] In industrial societies, postpartum depression is considered a major public health concern and affects about 15% of women. Postpartum depression also has negative developmental consequences for the child.[61] Research indicates 12 weeks may not be a long enough leave duration for those at risk of developing postpartum depression.[62] Fewer occurrences of depressive symptoms are correlated to longer maternity leave.[56] A study using data from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study - Birth Cohort indicates there is a lower likelihood of women developing severe depression  and increased overall health if women take longer maternity leave from work.[63] In addition, more depressive symptoms occurred in mothers postpartum when the spouse did not take any paternal leave.[63] Poor physical health of the mother during the postpartum period is associated with more depressive symptoms, making postnatal health, in addition to employment, a prevalent factor when considering mental health in new mothers. Negative physical health symptoms frequently reported included tiredness, back pain, and back problems.[64]

Economic

Economic efficiency

Four states currently offer paid family leave: California, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and Rhode Island.[65] In New Jersey, women who took paid leave in the year after giving birth were 40% less likely to receive public aid or food stamps.[66] According to a California-based study, 87% of employers reported that the paid leave requirement did not increase costs; 9% note that it saved money due to decreased turnover and other costs.[67]

In the United States, $40 million is spent annually on the re-hospitalization of preterm infants. In addition, each maternal re-hospitalization adds an extra $1,600-3,000 to the cost of childbirth. Paid maternity leave is associated with increased maternal and neonatal health, so offering paid leave could decrease these costs.[16]

Though the overall labor force participation has declined since the year 2000,[68] some economists argue that paid maternity leave in California has increased labor force participation among mothers.[69] Mothers who receive paid maternity leave may be more likely to return to employment later, and then work more hours and earn higher wages.[70] There is some evidence that the state paid maternity leave program in California saves businesses from needing to provide their own leave plans and financially stabilizes workers.[54]

Less favorable maternity leave policies may inhibit a woman's career trajectory and promotion prospects. The extended period of absence of such policies often reduce a women's economic status and opportunities.[71] During this hiatus, their job skills and experiences may deteriorate thus limiting their potential advancement.

Motherhood penalty
US - women's earnings as a percentage of men's in 2008 by age group

Available maternity leave options may also help lower the impact of children on career advancement, or the motherhood penalty. There currently exists a "family gap" between the pay of mothers and nonmothers. In the United States prior to the passage of the FMLA, mothers typically earned 70% of men's wages while nonmothers earned 90%.[13] These earning disparities partially stemmed from insecure employment return prospects. Women without maternity leave protection were often forced to start over with a new employer following their absence.[72] This interrupted their career progression and burdened them with the additional task of seeking new employment. Such factors ultimately impeded equitable access to income and career opportunities. Women as a group notably experience increasing income inequality as they age illustrating the impact of motherhood on their wage prospects. However, the implementation of FMLA addressed some of these impediments through the introduction of mandatory maternity leave. Mothers now are more likely to return to their previous employer due to this increased legal protection.[73] The policy minimizes some of the negative externalities of motherhood by maintaining women's employment options even following maternity leave. Many policy experts though suspect that the remaining gender imbalance is largely attributable to the dearth of paid leave options.[13] Women who worked for companies that provided paid maternity leave before they gave birth are more likely to take such leave for up to 12 weeks, and more likely to return to work more quickly thereafter.[74]

Social

Access equality

Under the current FMLA system, approximately 40% of United States workers are ineligible for benefits due to the brevity of their tenure or the smallness of their firm.[35] These excluded populations are often low-waged and minority women thus furthering their already present disadvantage. In 2016, 38% of white working mothers qualified for and could afford to take unpaid leave under FMLA compared with 30% of African American women and 25% of Hispanic women.[1] Moreover, the unpaid aspect of the current policy limits access to those who are economically well off. The United States Department of Labor reported that over a 22-month period in 1999 and 2000, 3.5 million people needed leave but were unable to take it due to affordability concerns.[75] In the private sector, it was found that 12% of workers received paid paternity leave with 23% of workers in the highest-wage quartile receiving paid maternity leave versus 5% of workers in the lowest-wage quartile.[1] The lack of monetary compensation may hinder the ability of women who are not as financially secure as others to balance employment with their family life. Upper class women are more likely to take unpaid leave than lower class women. In addition, more white women take unpaid maternity leave than black or Hispanic women. This imbalance contributes to the discrepancies in infant mortality between groups.[16]

Paternity leave

California is the first state to offer paid paternity leave weeks (six weeks, partial payment). New Jersey, Rhode Island,[76] and New York[77] since passed laws for paid family leave. In the rest of the US, paternity pay weeks are not offered (therefore neither paternity paid leave weeks), but fathers have access to unpaid paternity leave to care for their newborns (without new income).[76][78] Often, fathers will take sick days or vacation time when they have newborns. There is also a growing number of fathers that go unpaid. Some employers are required by law to allow 12 weeks of unpaid family leave after the birth or adoption of a child. This law is under FMLA or Family Medical Leave Act.[76] Fathers who have access to paid paternity leave give mothers the opportunity to engage in paid work, with a positive effect on female labor force participation and wages.[79] In 2015, a larger proportion of working fathers than mothers who requested leave received paid leave.[80]

The United States military branches also show a minimal paternity leave. Although some branches give more time after the birth to take the leave, all branches give ten days. This type of leave is applicable to those who are married.[81]

Longer paternity leave increases the father's engagement with a child, which leads to the child's improved cognitive and mental health outcomes and fewer behavior problems.[54][79]

Foreign comparison
See also: Parental leave § By country

The United States is the only industrialized nation that does not offer paid parental leave.[82] Of countries in the United Nations only the United States, Suriname, Papua New Guinea, and a few island countries in the Pacific Ocean do not require employers to provide paid time off for new parents.[83] A study of 168 countries found that 163 guarantee paid leave to women, and 45 guarantee paid paternity leave.[84]

The United States maternity leave policy is distinct for its relative scarcity of benefits in comparison to other industrialized countries. Thus, the legislation imposes relatively few restrictions on American firms and instead underscores employer discretion in the shaping of maternity leave policy. These firms are thus free to offer maternity leave policies on terms that are more aligned with corporate interests.[35]  This United States policy differs greatly from most other western countries in terms of maternity leave provision. These stark maternity leave differentials are demonstrated in both the policy's length and compensation. In terms of the length of protected maternity leave, the United States currently ranks 20th out of the 21 highest-income countries.[35] The United States is one of three countries, along with Oman and Papua New Guinea, that does not offer paid maternity leave. Countries that offer paid maternity leave include Mexico (12 weeks), United Kingdom (40 weeks), India (26 weeks), Chile (24 weeks), Canada (up to 18 months), and China (14 weeks). Although the United States does not guarantee paid maternity leave, employers may provide paid leave if they choose. There are four states in the United States that do provide paid maternity leave and they are California, Georgia, New Jersey, and Rhode Island.[85]

In the United States like other nations, child care is not always equally shared between mothers and fathers. In the United States, fathers can have some paid leaves if they live in California or other states with similar legislation (partial paid leave). In contrast, Slovenian fathers have 12 weeks of 100% paid paternity leave. In Sweden, 480 days of 80% paid paternity leave weeks. In Norway, 49 weeks of 100% paid paternity leave weeks or 59 weeks of 80% paid paternity leave. Finnish fathers have 11 partial paid leave weeks.[78][86]

gollark: If the dataset consists of people who are able to spell and grammar somewhat, then the model should also do that.
gollark: You could probably do something like that.
gollark: The ceramic server almost certainly isn't big enough of a dataset to train from scratch, nor do they have the GPUs for that, presumably.
gollark: The base GPT-2 models can do that. So if they finetuned one and didn't accidentally erase all its previous knowledge, it should also do that.
gollark: Generally they can manage to use basically-correct grammar and spelling, even if the semantics are wrong.

See also

References
  1. National Partnership for Women and Families (August 2016). "Expecting Better: A state-by-state analysis of laws that help expecting and new parents (4th edition)" (PDF).
  2. Vahratian, Anjel; Johnson, Timothy R.B. (September 2009). "Maternity Leave Benefits in the United States: Today's Economic Climate Underlines Deficiencies". Birth. 36 (3): 177–179. doi:10.1111/j.1523-536x.2009.00330.x. ISSN 0730-7659. PMC 4262924. PMID 19747263.
  3. OECD. "Parental Leave Systems" (PDF).
  4. Zagorsky, Jay L. (March 2017). "Divergent Trends in US Maternity and Paternity Leave, 1994–2015". American Journal of Public Health. 107 (3): 460–465. doi:10.2105/ajph.2016.303607. ISSN 0090-0036. PMC 5296693. PMID 28103064.
  5. Engeman, Cassandra. "When Do Unions Matter to Social Policy? Organized Labor and Leave Legislation in US States". Social Forces. doi:10.1093/sf/soaa074.
  6. O'Connell, M.; B. Downs; K. Smith (2001). "Maternity Leave and Employment Patterns: 1961-1995". Current Population Reports. 70 (79): 1–21.
  7. Bureau, US Census. "Census.gov". www.census.gov. Retrieved 2019-05-13.
  8. Berger, L.; J. Waldfogel (2004). "Maternity Leave and the Employment of New Mothers in the United States". Journal of Population Economics. 17 (2): 331–349. doi:10.1007/s00148-003-0159-9.
  9. McBride, Dorothy E. (2014-06-11). Women's Rights in the USA: Policy Debates and Gender Roles (4 ed.). Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203874493. ISBN 9780203874493.
  10. Tanaka, S. (2005). "Parental Leave and Child Health Across OECD Countries". The Economic Journal. 115 (501): 7–28. doi:10.1111/j.0013-0133.2005.00970.x.
  11. Patton, Dana; Costich, Julia F.; Lidströmer, Niklas (March 2017). "Paid Parental Leave Policies and Infant Mortality Rates in OECD Countries: Policy Implications for the United States". World Medical & Health Policy. 9 (1): 6–23. doi:10.1002/wmh3.214. ISSN 1948-4682.
  12. Gordon, Victoria (2013-06-10). Maternity Leave. doi:10.1201/b14999. ISBN 9780429254413.
  13. Waldfogel, J. (1998). "The Family Gap for Young Women in the United States and Britain: Can Maternity Leave Make a Difference?". Journal of Labor Economics. 16 (3): 505–545. doi:10.1086/209897.
  14. Gordon, Victoria (Associate professor) (2013-06-10). Maternity leave : policy and practice. Boca Raton. ISBN 9781466573581. OCLC 838447584.
  15. Jou, Judy; Kozhimannil, Katy B.; Abraham, Jean M.; Blewett, Lynn A.; McGovern, Patricia M. (February 2018). "Paid Maternity Leave in the United States: Associations with Maternal and Infant Health". Maternal and Child Health Journal. 22 (2): 216–225. doi:10.1007/s10995-017-2393-x. ISSN 1092-7875. PMID 29098488.
  16. Jou, Judy; Kozhimannil, Katy B.; Abraham, Jean M.; Blewett, Lynn A.; McGovern, Patricia M. (2017-11-02). "Paid Maternity Leave in the United States: Associations with Maternal and Infant Health". Maternal and Child Health Journal. 22 (2): 216–225. doi:10.1007/s10995-017-2393-x. ISSN 1092-7875. PMID 29098488.
  17. Bartel, Ann P.; Rossin-Slater, Maya; Ruhm, Christopher J.; Stearns, Jenna; Waldfogel, Jane (2017-11-06). "Paid Family Leave, Fathers' Leave-Taking, and Leave-Sharing in Dual-Earner Households" (PDF). Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 37 (1): 10–37. doi:10.1002/pam.22030. ISSN 0276-8739. PMID 29320808.
  18. "Wage and Hour Division (WHD): Family and Medical Leave Act". U.S. Department of Labor. Retrieved May 13, 2019.
  19. "Wage and Hour Division (WHD): Frequently Asked Questions". Department of Labor. U.S. Department of Labor. Retrieved May 13, 2019.
  20. "The Employee's Guide to The Family and Medical Leave Act" (PDF). Department of Labor. U.S. Department of Labor. Retrieved May 13, 2019.
  21. "U.S. Department of Labor Wage and Hour Division (July 2015) Fact Sheet #28J: The definition of "parent" as it applies to an individual who stood in loco parentis to an employee for FMLA "eldercare" protections" (PDF). Department of Labor. U.S. Department of Labor. Retrieved May 13, 2019.
  22. "The Employee's Guide to The Family and Medical Leave Act" (PDF). Department of Labor. U.S. Department of Labor. Retrieved May 13, 2019.
  23. "The Employee's Guide to The Family and Medical Leave Act" (PDF). Department of Labor. U.S. Department of Labor. Retrieved May 13, 2019.
  24. "U.S. Department of Labor Wage and Hour Division (July 2015) Fact Sheet #28J: The definition of "parent" as it applies to an individual who stood in loco parentis to an employee for FMLA "eldercare" protections" (PDF). Department of Labor. U.S. Department of Labor. Retrieved May 13, 2019.
  25. "The Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978". Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Retrieved May 13, 2019.
  26. "Maternity Insurance Coverage under ObamaCare". EHealthInsurances Services. EHealthInsurances Services. Retrieved May 13, 2019.
  27. "Wage and Hour Division (WHD) Handy Reference Guide to the Fair Labor Standards Act". Department of Labor. U.S. Department of Labor. Retrieved May 13, 2019.
  28. Dagher, Rada K; et al. (December 2013). "Maternity Leave Duration and Postpartum Mental and Physical Health: Implications for Leave Policies". Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law. 39 (2): 369–416. doi:10.1215/03616878-2416247. PMID 24305845.
  29. "Family and Medical Leave in 2012: Technical Report" (PDF). Department of Labor. U.S. Department of Labor. Retrieved May 13, 2019.
  30. Mathur, Aparna; et al. "Paid Family and Medical Leave: An Issue Whose Time Has Come" (PDF). Brookings. AEI-Brookings Working Group on Paid Family Leave. Retrieved May 13, 2019.
  31. Gult, Barbara. "Paid Parental Leave in the United States". National Partnership. National Partnership for Women & Families. Retrieved May 13, 2019.
  32. Hofferth, Sandra L.; Curtin, Sally C. (February 1, 2006). "Parental Leave Statutes and Maternal Return to Work After Childbirth in the United States". Work and Occupations. 33 (1): 73–105. doi:10.1177/0730888405281889.
  33. Leef, George. "Is Federal Paid Family Leave A Good Idea?". Forbes. Forbes. Retrieved May 13, 2019.
  34. Joya, Misra. "The US is stingier with child care and maternity leave than the rest of the world". The Conversation. The Conversation: Academic Rigor, Journalistic Flair. Retrieved May 13, 2019.
  35. Gornick, Janet; Ray, Rebecca; Schmitt, John (2008). "Parental Leave in 21 Countries: Assessing Generosity and Gender Equality". Center for Economic and Policy Research.
  36. "Paid Family Leave ― Grants for Single Moms". Single Mother Guide. 2011-03-12. Retrieved September 14, 2017.
  37. "Expecting Better: A State-by-State Analysis of Laws that Help New Parents". National Partnership for Women and Families. 2012. Retrieved 8 April 2013.
  38. Times, Air Force. "air-forces-new-12-week-maternity-leave-began-feb-5". Air Force Times. Retrieved 2017-03-15.
  39. "Carter Announces 12 Weeks Paid Military Maternity Leave, Other Benefit". U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE. Retrieved 2017-03-15.
  40. "Army Directive 2016-09 (Maternity Leave Policy)" (PDF).
  41. Deborah, Lee. "AIR FORCE INSTRUCTION 36-3003" (PDF).
  42. Information, This story was written by the Office of the Chief of. "SECNAV Announces New Maternity Leave Policy". Retrieved 2017-03-15.
  43. Affairs, This story was written by Chief of Naval Personnel Public. "Navy Updates Maternity Leave Policy". Retrieved 2017-03-15.
  44. S. 1790; NDAA 2020, Pub.L. 116-92, Pub.L. 116–92
  45. 5 USC § 6382(d)(2)
  46. Office of Personnel Management, MEMORANDUM FOR: HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES on December 27, 2019
  47. Staehelin, Katharina; Bertea, Paola Coda; Stutz, Elisabeth Zemp (August 2007). "Length of maternity leave and health of mother and child – a review" (PDF). International Journal of Public Health. 52 (4): 202–209. doi:10.1007/s00038-007-5122-1. ISSN 1661-8556.
  48. Mirkovic, Kelsey R.; Perrine, Cria G.; Scanlon, Kelley S. (2016). "Paid Maternity Leave and Breastfeeding Outcomes". Birth. 43 (3): 233–239. doi:10.1111/birt.12230. ISSN 1523-536X. PMID 26991788.
  49. Breastfeeding, Section On (2012-03-01). "Breastfeeding and the Use of Human Milk". Pediatrics. 129 (3): e827–e841. doi:10.1542/peds.2011-3552. ISSN 0031-4005. PMID 22371471.
  50. CDC (2019-03-12). "About Breastfeeding". Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved 2019-05-13.
  51. Kelly Wallace; Jen Christensen. "Paid leave benefits children and families, studies say". CNN. Retrieved 2017-10-02.
  52. Baker, M.; K. Milligan (2008). "Maternal Employment, Breastfeeding and Health: Evidence from Maternity Leave Mandates" (PDF). Journal of Health Economics. 27 (4): 871–887. doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.02.006. PMID 18387682.
  53. Ruhm, C. (2004). "Parental Employment and Child Cognitive Development" (PDF). Journal of Human Resources. 39 (1): 155–192. doi:10.2307/3559009. JSTOR 3559009.
  54. Lerner, Sharon (2013-12-12). "The New Push for Paid Family Leave". The American Prospect. ISSN 1049-7285. Retrieved 2019-05-13.
  55. McGovern, Pat; Dowd, Bryan; Gjerdingen, Dwenda; Gross, Cynthia R.; Kenney, Sally; Ukestad, Laurie; McCaffrey, David; Lundberg, Ulf (March 2006). "Postpartum Health of Employed Mothers 5 Weeks After Childbirth". Annals of Family Medicine. 4 (2): 159–167. doi:10.1370/afm.519. PMC 1467019. PMID 16569720.
  56. Chatterji, P.; S. Markowitz (2004). "Does the Length of Maternity Leave affect Maternal Health?". National Bureau of Economic Research.
  57. Tucker, Jenna N.; Grzywacz, Joseph G.; Leng, Iris; Clinch, C. Randall; Arcury, Thomas A. (2010-11-10). "Return to Work, Economic Hardship, and Women's Postpartum Health". Women & Health. 50 (7): 618–638. doi:10.1080/03630242.2010.522468. ISSN 0363-0242. PMID 21104566.
  58. Chatterji, Pinka; Markowitz, Sara; Brooks-Gunn, Jeanne (2013-01-01). "Effects of early maternal employment on maternal health and well-being". Journal of Population Economics. 26 (1): 285–301. doi:10.1007/s00148-012-0437-5. ISSN 1432-1475. PMC 3640562. PMID 23645972.
  59. Weber, Ashley; Harrison, Tondi M.; Steward, Deborah; Ludington-Hoe, Susan (February 2018). "Paid Family Leave to Enhance the Health Outcomes of Preterm Infants". Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice. 19 (1–2): 11–28. doi:10.1177/1527154418791821. ISSN 1527-1544. PMC 6532630. PMID 30134774.
  60. "Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research". Mayo Clinic.
  61. Apter-Levy, Yael; Feldman, Michal; Vakart, Adam; Ebstein, Richard P.; Feldman, Ruth (2013-10-01). "Impact of Maternal Depression Across the First 6 Years of Life on the Child's Mental Health, Social Engagement, and Empathy: The Moderating Role of Oxytocin". American Journal of Psychiatry. 170 (10): 1161–1168. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.12121597. ISSN 0002-953X. PMID 23846912.
  62. Dowd, Bryan E.; McGovern, Patricia M.; Dagher, Rada K. (2014-04-01). "Maternity Leave Duration and Postpartum Mental and Physical Health: Implications for Leave Policies". Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law. 39 (2): 369–416. doi:10.1215/03616878-2416247. ISSN 0361-6878. PMID 24305845.
  63. Chatterji, Pinka; Markowitz, Sara (July 2008). "Family Leave after Childbirth and the Health of New Mothers". Cambridge, MA. doi:10.3386/w14156. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  64. Woolhouse, Hannah; Gartland, Deirdre; Perlen, Susan; Donath, Susan; Brown, Stephanie J. (March 2014). "Physical health after childbirth and maternal depression in the first 12 months post partum: Results of an Australian nulliparous pregnancy cohort study". Midwifery. 30 (3): 378–384. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2013.03.006. ISSN 0266-6138. PMID 23619027.
  65. "10 things you need to know about maternity leave in the US". TechRepublic. Retrieved 2018-04-29.
  66. "Rutgers Study Finds Paid Family Leave Leads to Positive Economic Outcomes | Rutgers Today". news.rutgers.edu. 2012-01-19. Retrieved 2018-04-29.
  67. Milkman, Eileen Appelbaum, Ruth. "Leaves That Pay: Employer and Worker Experiences With Paid Family Leave in California". Retrieved 2018-04-29.
  68. Plumer, Brad (6 September 2013). "Three Reasons the US Labor Force Keeps Shrinking". Washington Post. Retrieved 4 June 2017.
  69. Miller, Claire Cain (30 January 2015). "The Economic Benefits of Paid Parental Leave". The New York Times. Retrieved 4 June 2017.
  70. Miller, Claire Cain (2015). "The Economic Benefits of Paid Parental Leave". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2017-10-02.
  71. Schwartz, F. (1989). "Management Women and the New Facts of Life". Harvard Business Review. 23 (1): 65–76.
  72. Lazear, E. (1981). "Agency, Earnings Profiles, Productivity, and Hours Restrictions". American Economic Review: 606–620.
  73. Curtin, S.; S. Hofferth (2006). "Parental Leave Statutes and Maternal Return to Work After Childbirth in the United States". Work and Occupations. 33 (1): 73–105. doi:10.1177/0730888405281889.
  74. Berger, Lawrence M.; Waldfogel, Jane (1 June 2004). "Maternity leave and the employment of new mothers in the United States". Journal of Population Economics. 17 (2): 331–349. doi:10.1007/s00148-003-0159-9.
  75. United States Department of Labor (2000). "Balancing the Needs of Families and Employees: FMLA Survey Report". Archived from the original on 2005-03-22. Retrieved 2013-03-26. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  76. "Paternity leave: What are the options for dads?". BabyCenter. November 2015. Retrieved June 9, 2017.
  77. "Paid Family leave: Information for employee". New York State. July 2018. Retrieved July 22, 2018.
  78. Maternity and paternity at work: Law and practice across the world. Ilo.org. May 13, 2014. ISBN 9789221286301. Retrieved June 9, 2017.
  79. United States Department of Labor. "Paternity Leave: Why Paternal Leave for Fathers is so Important for Working Families" (PDF).
  80. Zagorsky, Jay L. (March 2017). "Divergent Trends in US Maternity and Paternity Leave, 1994–2015". American Journal of Public Health. 107 (3): 460–465. doi:10.2105/ajph.2016.303607. ISSN 0090-0036. PMC 5296693. PMID 28103064.
  81. "Paternity Leave in the Military - MilitarySpot.com". MilitarySpot.com. February 7, 2011. Retrieved March 17, 2017.
  82. Eichner, Maxine (1 June 2010). "Families, human dignity, and state support for caretaking: Why the United States' failure to ameliorate the work-family conflict is a dereliction of the government's basic responsibilities". North Carolina Law Review. 88: 1593–1626.
  83. Hurt, Alyson. "Countries Around The World Beat The U.S. On Paid Parental Leave". NPR. Retrieved 9 May 2019.
  84. Grant, Jodi; Hatcher, Taylor; Patel, Nirali. "Expecting Better: A State-by-State Analysis of Parental Leave Programs" (PDF). National Partnership for Women & Families.
  85. Peck, Adam; Covert, Bryce. "U.S. Paid Family Leave Versus The Rest Of The World, In Two Disturbing Charts". THINKPROGRESS. CENTER FOR AMERICAN PROGRESS ACTION FUND. Retrieved 14 July 2015.
  86. "Individuals - Försäkringskassan". Forsakringskassan.se. Retrieved 2017-06-09.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.