Mary of Scotland (film)

Mary of Scotland is a 1936 RKO film starring Katharine Hepburn as the 16th-century ruler Mary, Queen of Scots.[3][4] Directed by John Ford, it is an adaptation of the 1933 Maxwell Anderson play. The screenplay was written by Dudley Nichols. It is largely in blank verse. Ginger Rogers wanted to play this role and made a convincing screen test, but RKO rejected her request to be cast in the part[5] feeling that the role was not suitable to Miss Rogers' image.

Mary of Scotland
movie poster
Directed byJohn Ford
Produced byPandro S. Berman
Screenplay byDudley Nichols
Based onMary of Scotland
1933 play
by Maxwell Anderson
StarringKatharine Hepburn
Fredric March
Music byNathaniel Shilkret
CinematographyJoseph H. August
Jack MacKenzie
Edited byJane Loring
Distributed byRKO Radio Pictures
Release date
  • July 30, 1936 (1936-07-30)
(New York)[1]
  • August 28, 1936 (1936-08-28)
Running time
123 minutes
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
Budget$864,000[2]
Box office$1,276,000[2]

Plot summary

Mary (Katharine Hepburn), by assuming her throne as queen of Scotland, strikes terror into the heart of Queen Elizabeth I (Florence Eldridge). After languishing in jail for 18 years at Elizabeth's command, Mary is offered a pardon if she will sign away her throne. Will she accept the deal, or die instead?[6]

Cast

Accuracy

The film does not keep close to the historical truth, portraying Mary as something of a wronged martyr and her third husband, James Hepburn, Earl of Bothwell (played by Fredric March), as a romantic hero. While true that Bothwell was a well known scoundrel his last marriage to Mary was genuine. Regarding Mary's historical status the false imprisonment by Elizabeth I and Anglo protestant intrigue in Scotland did undermine her more legitimate claim to not just the throne of Scotland but more so to the throne of England making her a dire threat to Elizabeth I.

Reception

Hepburn in a publicity still from film

Contemporary reviews were generally positive. Frank S. Nugent of The New York Times wrote it had a "blend of excellence and mere adequacy." He wrote that the film had "depth, vigor and warm humanity" but had scenes which "lack the vitality they possessed in the play", and considered Hepburn's characterization of the title role rather too soft in comparison with the historical Mary.[7] Variety praised the "extra-strong cast" and Ford's "sure-footed" direction. Hepburn's performance was described as "not really Mary Stuart but rather Katie Hepburn. And that is all in the film's favor because it humanizes it all and makes it that much more nearly acceptable." However, the review also found the film too long and the ending too sad, and conceding it could not end any other way without "completely corrupting history."[8] "Impressive historical drama finely acted and produced with all-around distinction", reported Film Daily.[9] Motion Picture Daily called the film "a splendidly powerful drama" with a "sincere, intelligent and genuine" performance by Hepburn.[10] Russell Maloney reviewed the film negatively in The New Yorker, writing that despite its high production values, "it has little or nothing to do with Maxwell Anderson's play. Any other historical drama of the period could have been sandwiched in between these scenes and it wouldn't have made a bit of difference." Of Hepburn's performance, Maloney wrote that she had "the cards stacked against her from the very start, because pageantry naturally interferes with characterization."[11]

The film is highly regarded by a few critics today, but in its time was a box-office flop, making a loss of $165,000.[2] This was Katharine Hepburn's second flop in a row causing her to being labeled "box office poison" in the late 1930s, leading to (after a two-year screen absence) her move to MGM for her comeback in The Philadelphia Story.

gollark: With 64 bits of mantissa.
gollark: Macron idea: all values are just 80-bit floats.
gollark: Macron idea: analog pointers with crosstalk.
gollark: Whenever an error happens, it randomly mutates nearby AST nodes until it works.
gollark: They were already moved to the runtime compile time metaphase anyway.

References

  1. "The Broadway Parade". Film Daily. New York: Wid's Films and Film Folk, Inc.: 2 July 27, 1936.
  2. Richard Jewel, 'RKO Film Grosses: 1931-1951', Historical Journal of Film Radio and Television, Vol 14 No 1, 1994 p. 57.
  3. Variety film review; August 5, 1936, p. 16.
  4. Harrison's Reports film review; July 25, 1936, p. 119.
  5. "Answers - The Most Trusted Place for Answering Life's Questions". Answers.com.
  6. "Mary of Scotland (1936) - Articles - TCM.com". Turner Classic Movies.
  7. Nugent, Frank S. (July 31, 1936). "Movie Review – Mary of Scotland". The New York Times. Retrieved August 16, 2015.
  8. "Mary of Scotland". Variety. New York: Variety, Inc.: 16 August 5, 1936.
  9. "Reviews of the New Films". Film Daily. New York: Wid's Films and Film Folk, Inc.: 7 July 24, 1936.
  10. "Looking 'Em Over". Motion Picture Daily. Quigley Publishing Company, Inc.: 8 July 23, 1936.
  11. Maloney, Russell (August 8, 1936). "The Current Cinema". The New Yorker: 52.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.