Mary Magdalene (1914 film)

Mary Magdalene is a 1914 silent film that costars Arthur Maude and Constance Crawley and is loosely based on the 1910 play of the same name by Belgian playwright Maurice Maeterlinck.

This article is about the film. For other uses, see Mary Magdalene (disambiguation).

Mary Magdalene
Crawley (center) as Mary
Directed byArthur Maude
StarringArthur Maude
Constance Crawley
Production
company
Kennedy Features
Distributed byWarner Features (USA)
Release date
  • February 4, 1914 (1914-02-04)
Running time
Three reels (about 12 minutes per reel)
CountryUnited States
LanguageSilent
English intertitles

Plot

The story takes place in Capernaum and Jerusalem during the two years leading up to the crucifixion of Jesus Christ, and follows the lives of Judas Iscariot (Arthur Maude) and Mary Magdalene (Constance Crawley), who indulge in their own selfish pursuits and care little about the plights of others. But when Mary hears Jesus preach an outdoor sermon, she learns the power of Christ's love and abandons her reckless ways to become one of his most ardent followers.[1][2]

Production

Charles Urban, the Anglo-British promoter of the Kinemacolor process of making color motion pictures, acquired worldwide rights to Maurice Maeterlinck's play Mary Magdalene with plans to produce a color film. Maeterlinck's mistress Georgette Leblanc, who had appeared in the title role of the original production of play, was retained to star in the movie.[3] Although Urban planned an Autumn 1913 release in London, and actual filming did take place in Europe, a final product never reached the screen. Instead, Aubrey Kennedy of Kennedy Features in Los Angeles, California, released his own version of Mary Magdalene in February 1914 that was filmed at cameraman James Crosby's J.A.C. Studio near downtown Los Angeles.[4][5]

Kennedy Features sought investors (state-right buyers) for the film by advertising that Mary Magdalene was "a stupendous production that will create a sensation wherever shown."[6][7] One theater ad that appeared after the 4 February 1914 release of the film even billed it as "the most magnificent melodramatic feature America has ever seen."[8] Although reviews of the film were generally positive,[1][2] and it was still being shown in theaters as late as November 1915,[9] little mention of Mary Magdalene appears in motion picture trade journals such as The Moving Picture World and Motography in the months after the film was released.[10]

Cast

Notes and references
  1. "Feature Films Reviewed - Mary Magdalene" (PDF). The Billboard. January 24, 1914. p. 56. Retrieved July 20, 2013.
  2. "In the Playhouses - The Cornell" (PDF). The Auburn Citizen. New York. February 26, 1914. p. 11. Retrieved July 26, 2013.
  3. "Mary Magdalene in Kinemacolor". Motography: Exploiting Motion Pictures. pp. v. 10, no. 2 (July 26, 1913), p. 64. Retrieved July 20, 2013.
  4. "Brevities of the Business". Motography: Exploiting Motion Pictures. pp. v. 10, no. 8 (October 18, 1913), p. 300. Retrieved July 20, 2013.
  5. "The London Stories Mix-up" (PDF). The New York Dramatic Mirror. New York. October 15, 1913. p. 30. Retrieved July 26, 2013.
  6. "Maurice Maeterlink's Mary Magdalene in three parts" (PDF). The Billboard. January 17, 1914. Retrieved July 26, 1914. Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  7. The Moving Picture World, Volume 19, Issues 1-7. Chalmers Publishing Company. 1914. p. 453. Retrieved January 21, 2013. mary magdalene arthur maude.
  8. "Rex Theater Today - Mary Magdalene". Union town Morning Herald. Pennsylvania. February 21, 1914. p. 4. Retrieved July 26, 2013.
  9. "The Pastime Theater - Exclusive Program Tonight - Mary Magdalene". Sheboygan Press. New York. November 15, 1915. p. 2. Retrieved July 26, 2013.
  10. The following trade journals make virtually no mention of the film in the months following its February 1914 release: Motography (Jan-Jun 1914), v. 11; Motography (Jul-Dec 1914), v. 12; Motography (Jan-Jun 1915), v. 13; and The Moving Picture World 1914
gollark: It doesn't really give you problems which C won't give you *anyway*!
gollark: In most cases you probably have bottlenecks other than string representation.
gollark: This is the best* representation.
gollark: What if you limit lengths to 255, and XOR the length with each byte of the string?
gollark: oh, that *is* a cool idea.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.