Majorization

In mathematics, majorization is a preorder on vectors of real numbers. For a vector , we denote by the vector with the same components, but sorted in descending order. Given , we say that weakly majorizes (or dominates) from below written as iff

Equivalently, we say that is weakly majorized (or dominated) by from below, written as .

If and in addition , we say that majorizes (or dominates) , written as . Equivalently, we say that is majorized (or dominated) by , written as .

Note that the majorization order does not depend on the order of the components of the vectors or . Majorization is not a partial order, since and do not imply , it only implies that the components of each vector are equal, but not necessarily in the same order.

Note that the notation is inconsistent in the mathematical literature: some use the reverse notation, e.g., is replaced with .

A function is said to be Schur convex when implies . Similarly, is Schur concave when implies

The majorization partial order on finite sets, described here, can be generalized to the Lorenz ordering, a partial order on distribution functions. For example, a wealth distribution is Lorenz-greater than another iff its Lorenz curve lies below the other. As such, a Lorenz-greater wealth distribution has a higher Gini coefficient, and has more income inequality.

Examples

The order of the entries does not affect the majorization, e.g., the statement is simply equivalent to .

(Strong) majorization: . For vectors with n components

(Weak) majorization: . For vectors with n components:

Geometry of majorization

Figure 1. 2D majorization example

For we have if and only if is in the convex hull of all vectors obtained by permuting the coordinates of .

Figure 1 displays the convex hull in 2D for the vector . Notice that the center of the convex hull, which is an interval in this case, is the vector . This is the "smallest" vector satisfying for this given vector .

Figure 2. 3D Majorization Example

Figure 2 shows the convex hull in 3D. The center of the convex hull, which is a 2D polygon in this case, is the "smallest" vector satisfying for this given vector .

Equivalent conditions

Each of the following statements is true if and only if :

  • for some doubly stochastic matrix (see Arnold,[1] Theorem 2.1). This is equivalent to saying can be represented as a convex combination of the permutations of . Furthermore the permutations require at most.[2]
  • From we can produce by a finite sequence of "Robin Hood operations" where we replace two elements and with and , respectively, for some (see Arnold,[1] p. 11).
  • For every convex function , (see Arnold,[1] Theorem 2.9).
  • . (see Nielsen and Chuang Exercise 12.17,[3])

In linear algebra

  • Suppose that for two real vectors , majorizes . Then it can be shown that there exists a set of probabilities and a set of permutations such that .[2] Alternatively it can be shown that there exists a doubly stochastic matrix such that
  • We say that a Hermitian operator, , majorizes another, , if the set of eigenvalues of majorizes that of .

In recursion theory

Given , then is said to majorize if, for all , . If there is some so that for all , then is said to dominate (or eventually dominate) . Alternatively, the preceding terms are often defined requiring the strict inequality instead of in the foregoing definitions.

Generalizations

Various generalizations of majorization are discussed in chapters 14 and 15 of the reference work Inequalities: Theory of Majorization and Its Applications. Albert W. Marshall, Ingram Olkin, Barry Arnold. Second edition. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer, New York, 2011. ISBN 978-0-387-40087-7

gollark: If it's "fight one polity without dubiously better weapons" versus "fight everyone who enforces the no-particle-beams rule"...
gollark: Well, they might.
gollark: From my very, *very* limited knowledge of this magnets could slow them down, but you would get bremhalsstrung [sic].
gollark: There doesn't *have* to be any defense against things. The universe isn't intrinsically fair.
gollark: They probably won't, because slow lingering deaths are not that useful in combat.

See also

Notes

  1. Barry C. Arnold. "Majorization and the Lorenz Order: A Brief Introduction". Springer-Verlag Lecture Notes in Statistics, vol. 43, 1987.
  2. Xingzhi, Zhan (2003). "The sharp Rado theorem for majorizations". The American Mathematical Monthly. 110 (2): 152–153. doi:10.2307/3647776.
  3. Nielsen, Michael A.; Chuang, Isaac L. (2010). Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-107-00217-3. OCLC 844974180.

References

  • J. Karamata. "Sur une inegalite relative aux fonctions convexes." Publ. Math. Univ. Belgrade 1, 145158, 1932.
  • G. H. Hardy, J. E. Littlewood and G. Pólya, Inequalities, 2nd edition, 1952, Cambridge University Press, London.
  • Inequalities: Theory of Majorization and Its Applications Albert W. Marshall, Ingram Olkin, Barry Arnold, Second edition. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer, New York, 2011. ISBN 978-0-387-40087-7
  • Inequalities: Theory of Majorization and Its Applications (1980) Albert W. Marshall, Ingram Olkin, Academic Press, ISBN 978-0-12-473750-1
  • A tribute to Marshall and Olkin's book "Inequalities: Theory of Majorization and its Applications"
  • Matrix Analysis (1996) Rajendra Bhatia, Springer, ISBN 978-0-387-94846-1
  • Topics in Matrix Analysis (1994) Roger A. Horn and Charles R. Johnson, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-46713-1
  • Majorization and Matrix Monotone Functions in Wireless Communications (2007) Eduard Jorswieck and Holger Boche, Now Publishers, ISBN 978-1-60198-040-3
  • The Cauchy Schwarz Master Class (2004) J. Michael Steele, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-54677-5

Software

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.