Like a Love?
"Like a Love?" is the eighth single released by Japanese singer Ami Suzuki under label Avex Trax. It was released in July 2006.
| "Like a Love?" | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
 | ||||
| Single by Ami Suzuki | ||||
| from the album Connetta | ||||
| Released | 26 July 2006 | |||
| Genre | J-pop | |||
| Length | ?:?? | |||
| Label | Avex Trax | |||
| Songwriter(s) | Ami Suzuki | |||
| Producer(s) | Max Matsuura | |||
| Ami Suzuki singles chronology | ||||
| ||||
Information
On June 28, 2006, it was announced that "Like a Love?" would be composed by Ai Otsuka, a popular J-pop singer. This will be the first time Otsuka has composed for any other artist besides herself.
Despite having Otsuka on board as the composer, the single flopped on the charts due to lack of promotion and very few televised performances.
Track listing
All lyrics are written by Ami Suzuki.
| No. | Title | Music | Arrangement | Length |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | "Like a Love?" | Ai | Ai, Ikoman | 4:13 |
| 2. | "Squall ni Nurete (スコールにぬれて)" | Kei Yoshikawa | Kenji Ueda | 4:47 |
| 3. | "Like a Love? (Instrumental)" | 4:12 | ||
| 4. | "Squall ni Nurete (スコールにぬれて) (Instrumental)" | 4:47 |
| No. | Title | Length |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | "Like a Love? (Music Clip)" |
Live performances
- 23 July 2006 – Music Express
- 28 July 2006 – Music Fighter
- 8 August 2006 - Pop Jam Deluxe Natsu Uta '06
- 10 August 2006 - Utaban
Charts
Oricon Sales Chart (Japan)
| Release | Chart | Peak Position | First Week Sales | Sales Total | Chart Run |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26 July 2006 | Oricon Daily Singles Chart | 13 | |||
| Oricon Weekly Singles Chart | 23 | 8,765 copies | 12,980 copies | 4 weeks |
gollark: - They may be working on them, but they initially claimed that they weren't necessary and they don't exist now. Also, I don't trust them to not do them wrong.- Ooookay then- Well, generics, for one: they *kind of exist* in that you can have generic maps, channels, slices, and arrays, but not anything else. Also this (https://fasterthanli.me/blog/2020/i-want-off-mr-golangs-wild-ride/), which is mostly about the file handling not being good since it tries to map on concepts which don't fit. Also channels having weird special syntax. Also `for` and `range` and `new` and `make` basically just being magic stuff which do whatever the compiler writers wanted with no consistency- see above- Because there's no generic number/comparable thing type. You would need to use `interface{}` or write a new function (with identical code) for every type you wanted to compare- You can change a signature somewhere and won't be alerted, but something else will break because the interface is no longer implemented- They are byte sequences. https://blog.golang.org/strings.- It's not. You need to put `if err != nil { return err }` everywhere.
gollark: Oh, and the error handling is terrible and it's kind of the type system's fault.
gollark: If I remember right Go strings are just byte sequences with no guarantee of being valid UTF-8, but all the functions working on them just assume they are.
gollark: Oh, and the strings are terrible.
gollark: Also, channels are not a particularly good primitive for synchronization.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.