Lexical set

A lexical set is a group of words that all fall under a single category based on some shared phonological feature.

Wells Standard Lexical Sets for English

The Standard Lexical Sets for English introduced by John C. Wells in Accents of English are in wide usage. Wells defined each lexical set on the basis of the pronunciation of words in two reference accents, which he calls RP and GenAm.[1]

  • "RP" refers to Received Pronunciation, the traditionally prestigious accent in England.[2]
  • "GenAm" refers to an accent of the General American type, which is associated with a geographically "neutral" or widespread sound system throughout the US.[3]

Wells classifies English words into 24 lexical sets on the basis of the pronunciation of the vowel of their stressed syllable in the two reference accents. Each lexical set is named after a representative keyword.[4] Wells also describes three sets of words based on word-final unstressed vowels, which, though not included in the standard 24 lexical sets (the final three sets listed in the chart below) "have indexical and diagnostic value in distinguishing accents".[5]

Lexical sets, as defined in Wells (1982), pp. xviii–ix, 120–2, 166–7
KeywordRPGenAmExample words
KIT ɪ ɪship, sick, bridge, milk, myth, busy
DRESS e ɛstep, neck, edge, shelf, friend, ready
TRAP æ ætap, back, badge, scalp, hand, cancel
LOT ɒ ɑstop, sock, dodge, romp, possible, quality
STRUT ʌ ʌcup, suck, budge, pulse, trunk, blood
FOOT ʊ ʊput, bush, full, good, look, wolf
BATH ɑː æstaff, brass, ask, dance, sample, calf
CLOTH ɒ ɔcough, broth, cross, long, Boston
NURSE ɜː ɜrhurt, lurk, urge, burst, jerk, term
FLEECE iː icreep, speak, leave, feel, key, people
FACE eɪ eɪtape, cake, raid, veil, steak, day
PALM ɑː ɑpsalm, father, bra, spa, lager
THOUGHT ɔː ɔtaught, sauce, hawk, jaw, broad
GOAT əʊ osoap, joke, home, know, so, roll
GOOSE uː uloop, shoot, tomb, mute, huge, view
PRICE aɪ aɪripe, write, arrive, high, try, buy
CHOICE ɔɪ ɔɪadroit, noise, join, toy, royal
MOUTH aʊ aʊout, house, loud, count, crowd, cow
NEAR ɪə ɪrbeer, sincere, fear, beard, serum
SQUARE ɛə ɛrcare, fair, pear, where, scarce, vary
START ɑː ɑrfar, sharp, bark, carve, farm, heart
NORTH ɔː ɔrfor, war, short, scorch, born, warm
FORCE ɔː orfour, wore, sport, porch, borne, story
CURE ʊə ʊrpoor, tourist, pure, plural, jury
happYiicopy, scampi, taxi, sortie, committee, hockey, Chelsea
lettERəərpaper, metre, calendar, stupor, succo(u)r, martyr, figure
commAəəcatalpa, quota, vodka

For example, the word rod is pronounced /rɒd/ in RP and /rɑd/ in GenAm. It therefore belongs in the LOT lexical set. Weary is pronounced /ˈwɪərɪ/ in RP and /ˈwɪrɪ/ in GenAm and thus belongs in the NEAR lexical set.

Some English words do not belong to any lexical set. For example, the a in the stressed syllable of tomato is pronounced /ɑː/ in RP, and /eɪ/ in GenAm, a combination that is very unusual and is not covered by any of the 24 lexical sets above.[6] The GenAm pronunciation of words pronounced with /ɒ/ before a velar consonant in RP, such as mock and fog, varies between /ɔ/ and /ɑ/ and so the words belong to no particular lexical set.[7]

Choice of the keywords

Wells explains his choice of keywords ("kit", "fleece", etc.) as follows:

The keywords have been chosen in such a way that clarity is maximized: whatever accent of English they are spoken in, they can hardly be mistaken for other words. Although fleece is not the commonest of words, it cannot be mistaken for a word with some other vowel; whereas beat, say, if we had chosen it instead, would have been subject to the drawback that one man's pronunciation of beat may sound like another's pronunciation of bait or bit.[4]

Wherever possible, the keywords end in a voiceless alveolar or dental consonant.[4]

Usage

The Standard Lexical Sets of Wells are widely used to discuss the phonological and phonetic systems of different accents of English in a clear and concise manner. Although based solely on RP and GenAm, the Standard Lexical Sets have proven useful in describing many other accents of English. This is true because, in many dialects, the words in all or most of the sets are pronounced with similar or identical stressed vowels. Wells himself uses the Lexical Sets most prominently to give "tables of lexical incidence" for all the various accents he discusses in his work. For example, here is the table of lexical incidence he gives for Newfoundland English:[8]

The table indicates that, for example, Newfoundland English uses the /ɪ/ phoneme for words in the KIT lexical set, and that the NORTH, FORCE and CURE sets are all pronounced with the same vowel /ɔ̈r/. Note that some lexical sets, such as FACE, are given with more than one pronunciation, which indicates that not all words in the FACE lexical set are pronounced similarly (in this case, Newfoundland English has not fully undergone the pane–pain merger). /ɔ̈/ is a back vowel [ɔ]; Wells uses the symbol ⟨ɔ̈⟩ so that the reader does not confuse it with the THOUGHT vowel (which, in the case of many other accents, he writes with ⟨ɔ⟩ or ⟨ɔː⟩).[9]

Wells also uses the Standard Lexical Sets to refer to "the vowel sound used for the standard lexical set in question in the accent under discussion":[10] Thus, for example, in describing the Newfoundland accent, Wells writes that "KIT and DRESS are reportedly often merged as [ɪ]",[11] meaning that the stressed syllables of words in the KIT lexical set and words in the DRESS lexical set are reportedly often pronounced identically with the vowel [ɪ].

Lexical sets may also be used to describe splits and mergers. For example, RP, along with most other non-rhotic accents, pronounces words such as "father" and "farther" identically. This can be described more economically as the merger of the PALM and START lexical sets. Most North American accents make "father" rhyme with "bother". This can be described as the merger of the PALM and LOT lexical sets.

Origin

In a 2010 blog post, Wells wrote:

I sometimes think that a century from now my lexical sets will be the one thing I shall be remembered for. Yet I dreamt them up over a weekend, frustrated with the incoherent mess of symbols used in such contemporary publications as Weinreich's "Is a structural dialectology possible?".[12]

He also wrote that he claimed no copyright in the Standard Lexical Sets, and that everyone was "free to make whatever use of them they wish".[12]

Extensions

Some varieties of English make distinctions in stressed vowels that are not captured by the 24 lexical sets. For example, some Irish and Scottish accents that have not undergone the fern–fir–fur merger split the NURSE lexical set into multiple subsets. For such accents, the 24 Wells lexical sets may be inadequate. Because of this, a work devoted to Irish English may split the Wells NURSE set into two subsets, a new, smaller NURSE set and a TERM set.[13]

Some writers on English accents have introduced a GOAL set to refer to a set of words that have the GOAT vowel in standard accents but may have a different vowel in Sheffield[14] or in south-east London.[15] Wells has stated that he didn't include a GOAL set because this should be interpreted as an allophone of GOAT that is sensitive to the morpheme boundary, which he illustrates by comparing the London pronunciations of goalie and slowly.[16]

Schneider et al. (2004), which documents the phonologies of varieties of English around the world like Wells (1982), employs Wells Standard Lexical Sets as well as the following supplementary lexical sets, as needed to illustrate finer details of the variety in discussion:

GOAL, horsES, HEAD, BIRTH, BERTH, PRIZE, AFTER, NEVER, STAY, STONE, STAND, OFF, DO, ONE, SNOW, BOAR, POWER, FIRE, EARS, TUESDAY, NEW, MARRY, MERRY, MARY, ORANGE, KITTEN, DANCE, TOMORROW, LOUD, HAND, PIN, PEN, THINK, LENGTH, GOING, POOL, PULL, FEEL, FILL, FAIL, FELL, MIRROR, NEARER, COW, STAR, FIT, CUP, PIECE, BROAD, LOOSE, EIGHT, metER, BEER, treacLE, BARE, BACK, BED, paintEd, villAge, TERM, SPHERE, ZERO, carrIER, cordIAL, cUrious, TRUER, TRUANT, officEs, About, IT, SIT, LAYER, BITE, BIDE, BYRE, BILE, BOUT, BOWED, BOWER, BOWEL, uncLE, DOOR, POOR[17]

Other languages

Lexical sets have also been used to describe the pronunciation of other languages, such as French,[18] Irish[19] and Scots.[20]

gollark: Check under /lib somewhere?
gollark: I think OpenOS has some kind of native support for that.
gollark: If you just have a stream, you often have to handle stuff like figuring out exactly where each bit of it starts and ends, which is annoying when there's an underlying packetized protocol anyway.
gollark: Or possibly some API which lets you mix both somehow, that would be neat.
gollark: Honestly, I think that in many applications arbitrary-size packets map better to what you're doing than streams.

See also

References
  1. Wells (1982).
  2. Wells (1982), p. 117.
  3. Wells (1982), p. 118.
  4. Wells (1982), p. 123.
  5. Wells (1982), p. 165.
  6. Wells (1982), p. 122.
  7. Wells (1982), p. 136.
  8. Wells (1982), p. 499.
  9. Wells (1982), p. 498.
  10. Wells (1982), p. 124.
  11. Wells (1982), p. 500.
  12. "John Wells's phonetic blog: lexical sets". 2010-02-02. Retrieved 2010-04-30.
  13. Hickey, Raymond (2004). A sound atlas of Irish English. Mouton de Gruyter. pp. 54–55. ISBN 3-11-018298-X.
  14. Stoddart, Upton and Widowson in Urban Voices, Arnold, London, 1999, page 76
  15. Tollfree in Urban Voices, Arnold, London, 1999, page 165
  16. "John Wells's phonetic blog: the evidence of the vows". 2011-05-03. Retrieved 2014-02-17.
  17. Schneider et al. (2004), pp. 42–3, 53–4, 101–2, 137, 187, 236, 263–4, 273, 285, 290, 294, 303–4, 340, 359, 369, 395, 410, 460, 504–5, 515, 518, 585, 761–2, 849, 880, 893, 928, 945, 947, 956, 968, 987, 993, 1006, 1024, 1038, 1050.
  18. Armstrong, Nigel (2001). Social and stylistic variation in spoken French: a comparative approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 100ff. ISBN 90-272-1839-0.
  19. Raymond Hickey (29 August 2011). The Dialects of Irish: Study of a Changing Landscape. Walter de Gruyter. ISBN 978-3-11-023830-3.
  20. Robert McColl Millar (2007). Northern and insular Scots. Edinburgh University Press. ISBN 978-0-7486-2316-7.

Bibliography
  • Schneider, Edgar W.; Burridge, Kate; Kortmann, Bernd; Mesthrie, Rajend; Upton, Clive (2004). A Handbook of Varieties of English. Volume 1: Phonology. Mouton de Gruyter. ISBN 978-3-11-017532-5.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Wells, John C. (1982). Accents of English. Volume 1: An Introduction (pp. i–xx, 1–278), Volume 3: Beyond the British Isles (pp. i–xx, 467–674). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-52129719-2, 0-52128541-0.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.