Let Your Hair Down (Grimm)

"Let Your Hair Down" is the 7th episode of the supernatural drama television series Grimm of season 1 and the mid-season finale which premiered on December 16, 2011, on NBC. The episode was written by co-executive producer Sarah Goldfinger and executive producer Naren Shankar, and was directed by Holly Dale.

"Let Your Hair Down"
Grimm episode
Episode no.Season 1
Episode 7
Directed byHolly Dale
Written bySarah Goldfinger
Naren Shankar
Produced by
Featured musicRichard Marvin
Cinematography byCort Fey
Editing byJacque Toberen
Production code107
Original air dateDecember 16, 2011 (2011-12-16)
Running time43 minutes
Guest appearance(s)

Plot

Opening quote: "The enchantress was so hard-hearted that she banished the poor girl to a wilderness, where she had to live in a miserable, wretched state."

A couple is wandering through the woods when they're captured by a drug dealer. That night, when he prepares to kill them, he is murdered by a creature while they escape. While Nick (David Giuntoli) and Hank (Russell Hornsby) investigate, Nick discovers buckshot, a hair and a female Blutbad wandering before fleeing. He asks Monroe (Silas Weir Mitchell) (who is decorating his house for Christmas) to help him. They go to the woods where they find the female blutbad as and chase her before she disappears, they then find her her treehouse, which they climb up to and discover she is living there.

Meanwhile, Bud (the man who previously fled scared after realizing Nick was a Grimm) tells two of his friends about Nick's origin. They're skeptical but they realize he's right when they pass his house at night. When Nick arrives home, they flee. Meanwhile, Sgt. Wu (Reggie Lee) tells Hank that the DNA of the hair matches a previous case Hank worked on, about a missing girl, Holly Clark.

The dealer's brothers want their brothers body and they eventually kidnap the man from the woods, as he may have taken part in their brother's death. Nick determines that the female Blutbad is Holly Clark. Monroe comforts her while Nick gives the news to Hank. Hank and Sgt. Wu interrogate neighbour James Addison (Ted Rooney). Once they take him to the station, Nick finds camping gear in the treehouse which belongs to Addison, he then calls Hank to let him know what he has found. Upon learning this, Hank then tells Addison who tries attacking him, before Hank arrests him.

The brothers arrive at the treehouse, thinking Monroe is responsible for the dealer's death. While he tries to explain, Nick and Holly manage to defeat the brothers. Nick takes Holly back home while Captain Renard (Sasha Roiz) makes an announcement to the media about her rescue. The episode ends as Holly points out Addison as her prime captor while her eyes turn red.

Reception

Viewers

The episode was viewed by 5.16 million people, earning a 1.5/5 in the 18-49 rating demographics on the Nielson ratings scale, marking a 5% decrease in viewership and ranking first in its timeslot and for the first time, ranking first for the night in the 18-49 demographics.[1] This means that 1.5 percent of all households with televisions watched the episode, while 5 percent of all households watching television at that time watched it.

Critical reviews

"Let Your Hair Down" received positive reviews. Amy Ratcliffe of IGN gave the episode a "great" 8.0 out of 10 and wrote "This episode shows that the supernatural can be blended in with a soft touch. Holly was a Blutbad, sure, but more importantly she was a lost girl. She survived alone in the woods for years because of her wolf-ness; she was able to come back to reality because of connecting with Monroe. The fairy tale aspect was relevant to the story, but it didn't take center stage. The emotional and scary parts of her ordeal were able to shine through. It was an ideal mix."[2]

The A.V. Club's Kevin McFarland gave the episode a "B-" grade and wrote, "Grimm has too many threads to follow right now, and it's painted itself into a corner where even a few great scenes that move the episodic plot along and tease out some details of the creature world leaves something out, and tonight that was the slow crawl of the season-long arc. There is very little narrative drive beyond a weekly case and some background information from Eddie Monroe. Once Upon A Time finds itself in a position where it's using flashbacks to serve a constant drive forward in an ongoing story, and not focusing as much on the episodic conflicts. Grimm is getting too bogged down in the Law & Order case-of-the-week and not providing enough in serialization. It's still in a state of flux, and doesn't quite know what it wants to be. I'm along for the ride, and any episode that features Silas Weir Mitchell in a bigger role can't be all bad, but 'Let Your Hair Down' is a warning sign that Grimm has too many plates in the air, and if it isn't careful, they're all going to come tumbling down and make a huge mess."[3]

TV Overmind's Shilo Adams wrote, "When I took on the role of writing about Grimm, I was a tad nervous. I’m not a huge watcher of procedurals and very rarely watch cop dramas in my free time, so I simply hoped that the show would toss in enough serial elements to keep me interested to go along with the expected legal wranglings of Portland, Oregon. After a sluggish start in terms of character beats, it looks like Grimm is on its way to being able to please fans of the serial and procedural elements of TV, if 'Let Your Hair Down' is any indication. Grimm may not stack up character moments like its genre show peers, but when it does decide to give you a peek behind the curtain, it's usually a whole lot of fun, as evidenced by last night's episode that gave just about everybody a moment or two to just be themselves."[4]

Nick McHatton from TV Fanatic, gave a 4.2 star rating out of 5, stating: "Over the last two episodes, Grimm has found a storytelling pace that really works, and it's beginning to offer payoffs to plot elements laid out weeks ago. Now if only I can figure out if Juliette is an evil-doer and Renard would actually do something fairy tale-ish."[5]

gollark: Or just use actual hashing?
gollark: (if each receiver gets all the messages, it'll have to try and decrypt all of them)
gollark: Well, if you like, stick them on the same channel. I don't think it matters much for anything but making receivers do marginally less work (trying to) decrypt all the messages.
gollark: Is that relevant?
gollark: Ummm... I'd go for making the channel name (part of) the hash of the key or something.

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.