Lees-Haley Fake Bad Scale

The Lees-Haley Fake Bad Scale (FBS) or MMPI Symptom Validity Scale is a set of 43 items in the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory that was selected by Paul R. Lees-Haley in 1991 to detect malingering for the forensic evaluation of personal injury claimants.[1] It was endorsed by the MMPI publishers in 2006 and incorporated into the official scoring keys. A 2008 Wall Street Journal article noted that a few psychologists argued that it was controversial because they felt that some individuals with legitimate injuries would be categorized as faking bad.[2]

History

The items on the FBS were selected by Lees-Haley on the basis of frequency differences between a sample of individuals known to be malingering and individuals judged to have legitimate complaints and his personal observations of malingerers.[1]

The FBS is a generally accepted validity test. For example, in their survey of validity test use, Sharland and Gfeller (2007)[3] found that the FBS was the third most widely used validity test by neuropsychologists. In a more recent study, Martin, Schroeder, and Odland (2015) found in a survey of general practitioners that the FBS was the most widely used symptom validity test (SVT) for the MMPI-2 and one of the two most widely used for the MMPI-2-RF.[4]

Validity

The largest meta-analysis of the FBS compared 1,615 judged over-reporters to 2,049 normal patients and found an effect size of 0.94. The authors concluded that “the preponderance of the current literature supports the use of FBS within forensic settings” (p. 55).[5]

An updated meta-analysis of data from 5,341 subjects published in 2010 further confirmed findings of the first. The authors conclude, “Practitioners who rely on FBS can be assured that the now extensive literature strongly supports application of FBS in forensic neuropsychology practice” (p. 717).[6]

gollark: A stickman with a bee/lemon head?
gollark: As an alternative to Coral's proposal there could be theme color URL parameters.
gollark: ↑
gollark: I mean, it does, but not for this.
gollark: Yes, it would be a bit stupid to have my server monitor *itself*.

See also

References
  1. Lees-Haley, Paul R., Lue Thorn English, and Walter J. Glenn. "A fake bad scale on the MMPI-2 for personal injury claimants." Psychological Reports 68.1 (1991): 203-210.
  2. David Armstrong. "Malingerer Test Roils Personal-Injury Law". Wall Street Journal.
  3. Sharland, M. J., and Gfeller, J. D. (2007). A survey of neuropsychologists’ beliefs and practices with respect to the assessment of effort. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 22(2). 213-223.
  4. Martin, P. K., Schroeder, R. W., and Odland, A. P. (2015). Neuropsychologists’ Validity Testing Beliefs and Practices: A Survey of North American Professionals. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 29(6), 741-776.
  5. Nelson, Nathaniel W., Jerry J. Sweet, and George J. Demakis. "Meta-analysis of the MMPI-2 Fake Bad Scale: Utility in forensic practice." The Clinical Neuropsychologist 20.1 (2006): 39-58.
  6. Nelson, N. W., Hoelzle, J. B., Sweet, J. J., Arbisi, P. A. & Demakis, G. J. (2010). Updated meta-analysis of the MMPI-2 Symptom Validity Scale (FBS): Verified Utility in Forensic Practice. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 24: 701-724.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.