Late Night Tales: Turin Brakes

Late Night Tales: Turin Brakes is a DJ mix album, mixed by Turin Brakes. It is the 11th in Late Night Tales' Late Night Tales / Another Late Night series. Turin Brakes were approached to release a compilation in 2003. Since the release Turin Brakes have done several DJ sets in the London area. The album features an exclusive cover of the Rolling Stones' "Moonlight Mile."

Late Night Tales: Turin Brakes
Compilation album by
Turin Brakes
Released16 February 2004
Recorded?
GenreIndie
Length75:33
LabelAzuli
ProducerTurin Brakes
Turin Brakes chronology
The Optimist LP
(2001)		 Late Night Tales: Turin Brakes
(2004)		 Ether Song
(2003)
Late Night Tales chronology
Jamiroquai
(2003)		 Turin Brakes
(2004)		 Four Tet
(2004)

Track listing
  1. "Last Night I Dreamt Of Mississippi" - Nicolai Dunger
  2. "Midnight Cowboy" - John Barry
  3. "Send In The Clouds" - Silver Jews
  4. "Lagos Soundsystem" (featuring Henri Gaobi) - Les Barons
  5. "A Walk In The Night" - Grant Green
  6. "Blues Music" - G. Love & Special Sauce
  7. "Dreamy Eyed Girl" - John Hammond
  8. "Breaking Your Fall" - Chris Whitley
  9. "Speed Trials" - Dave Palmer
  10. "Magnolia" - J. J. Cale
  11. "I Believe In You" - Talk Talk
  12. "Short Tales Of The Black Forest" (featuring John McLaughlin) - Al Di Meola
  13. "Cold Blooded Old Times" - Smog
  14. "One And Only" - Gillian Welch
  15. "A Pearl For Iona" - Jessica Lauren
  16. "Moonlight Mile" - Turin Brakes
  17. "The White City Part 4" - read by Brian Blessed


gollark: I might have to release apioforms from the beecloud.
gollark: It must comfort you to think so.
gollark: > There is burgeoning interest in designing AI-basedsystems to assist humans in designing computing systems,including tools that automatically generate computer code.The most notable of these comes in the form of the first self-described ‘AI pair programmer’, GitHub Copilot, a languagemodel trained over open-source GitHub code. However, codeoften contains bugs—and so, given the vast quantity of unvettedcode that Copilot has processed, it is certain that the languagemodel will have learned from exploitable, buggy code. Thisraises concerns on the security of Copilot’s code contributions.In this work, we systematically investigate the prevalence andconditions that can cause GitHub Copilot to recommend insecurecode. To perform this analysis we prompt Copilot to generatecode in scenarios relevant to high-risk CWEs (e.g. those fromMITRE’s “Top 25” list). We explore Copilot’s performance onthree distinct code generation axes—examining how it performsgiven diversity of weaknesses, diversity of prompts, and diversityof domains. In total, we produce 89 different scenarios forCopilot to complete, producing 1,692 programs. Of these, wefound approximately 40 % to be vulnerable.Index Terms—Cybersecurity, AI, code generation, CWE
gollark: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2108.09293.pdf
gollark: This is probably below basically everywhere's minimum wage.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.