Langton's Classification of Australian Wine

Langton's Classification of Australian Wine is a listing of fine Australian wines compiled by wine-specialist auction house and online merchant Langton's. The Classification is a ranking of the best-performing Australian wines based on secondary market support over a minimum of 10 vintages. It was first published in 1991.[1][2][3][4] The Classification is divided into three categories - Exceptional, Outstanding and Excellent - and new editions have appeared at intervals of approximately five years. The sixth edition was published in May 2014 and includes 139 of Australia's finest wines. Editions of the classification are identified by Roman numerals.[1]

Langton's has been owned by Woolworths Limited since 2009.[5]

Langton's Classification of Australian Wine VI

The most recent Classification was released on 1 May 2014. Classification VI has three tiers; the previous Classification V had four tiers. The new tiers are

  • Exceptional: 21 wines in 2014.
  • Outstanding: 53 wines in 2014.
  • Excellent: 65 wines in 2014.[6]

History of the classification

The first Classification was published in 1991, Langton's Classification of Distinguished Australian Wine I, had its background in a publication from 1990, the Langton's Vintage Wine Price Guide. In the 1991 classification, 34 wines were classified using three categories: Outstanding (A), Outstanding (B), and Excellent. Only one wine was classified as Outstanding (A): Penfolds Grange Shiraz.[7]

Langton's sees its classification as "loosely modelled on the Bordeaux Classification of 1855",[7] but with its regular reclassifications it is more similar to the Classification of Saint-Émilion wine, although with several differences: no official governmental recognition, a much wider geographic scope, and with several different wine styles classified using the same categories.

Langton's Classification of Distinguished Australian Wine II was published in 1996, and included 64 wines in four categories: Outstanding A (three wines), Outstanding, Excellent A, and Excellent.

Langton's Classification of Australian Wine III was published in 2000, and included 89 wines in the four categories also used for classifications IV and V; Exceptional (seven wines), Outstanding, Excellent, and Distinguished. From classification III, fortified wines ("Port") were no longer included.[7]

Langton's Classification of Australian Wine IV of 2005 included 101 wines, of which 11 at the Exceptional level.[7]

In 2009, Langton's was purchased by Woolworths.[8] Despite concerns raised at the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC),[9] the purchase went ahead, and Woolworths therefore owns the Classification.

So far (2014), no wine included in the top ("Exceptional") category has ever been demoted; this category remains the smallest but has progressively expanded to include additional wines with each edition of the Classification.[6]

'Exceptional' category

In the Classification VI (2014), the following 21 wines are included in the "Exceptional" category.[6] For historical reasons, Penfolds Grange is listed first, with the other wines following in alphabetical order. The year when the wines were included in the 'Exceptional' category (or its predecessor "Outstanding A") is indicated.[7]

gollark: I didn't say that that produces *good* outcomes for people involved.
gollark: Apparently the (or at least a) reason for this problem is that a degree works as a proxy for some minimum standard at stuff like being able to consistently do sometimes-boring things for 4 years, remember information and do things with it, and manage to go to class on time. So it's useful information regardless of whether the employer actually needs your specialized knowledge at all (in many cases, they apparently do not). And they're increasingly common, so *not* having one is an increasing red flag - you may have some sort of objection to the requirement for them, but that can't be distinguished from you just not being able to get one.
gollark: The solution, clearly, is to ban asking people if they have degrees when hiring, and force them to be tested on other things instead.
gollark: That wouldn't destroy it.
gollark: The most feasible way would probably be to deorbit the earth with MANY mass drivers.

See also

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.