Lamont seamount chain

Lamont seamount chain is a chain of submarine mountains in the eastern Pacific Ocean which are named "Sasha", "MIB", "MOK", "DTD" and "NEW". They are located close to the East Pacific Rise and reach a minimum depth of 1,629 metres (5,344 ft).

Lamont seamount chain
Lamont seamount chain (Pacific Ocean)
Location
Coordinates10°00′N 104°30′W[1]

These seamounts are submarine volcanoes of Pleistocene to Holocene age that are usually capped off by summit calderas and craters. They have erupted lava flows of tholeiitic composition; the last eruption may have occurred less than 8,000 years ago.

Geography and geomorphology

The Lamont seamount chain is a group of five seamounts in the Pacific Ocean;[2] from southeast to northwest they are known as "Sasha",[3] "MIB", "MOK", "DTD" and "NEW"[1] and there is an additional unnamed seamount southwest from "NEW".[4] The seamounts were discovered in 1983 and named later.[5]

The seamounts reach heights of 1–1.4 kilometres (0.62–0.87 mi) and have summit craters/calderas,[2] that on "DTD", "MOK" and "NEW" form nested, complex calderas.[6] Horseshoe-shaped volcanic ridges accompany the calderas and lava effusion appears to have preferentially occurred on the margins of the calderas, along with mass wasting.[7] The Lamont seamount chain forms a 50 kilometres (31 mi) long chain and the individual seamounts surrounded by lava cones 140–100 metres (460–330 ft) high.[2] The shallowest part of the chain is on one of the western seamounts and lies at 1,629 metres (5,344 ft) depth[8] while Sasha reaches to 1,890 metres (6,200 ft), "MIB" to 1,630 metres (5,350 ft) depth, "MOK" to 1,640 metres (5,380 ft) and "NEW" to 1,670 metres (5,480 ft);[9] in general the seamounts shallow westward and their outline changes from conical to more elongated.[5]

Geology

While the Clipperton Fracture Zone is located just north, the East Pacific Rise lies east of the seamounts;[10] Sasha Seamount lies just 8 kilometres (5.0 mi) from the Rise.[3] It appears to contain a magma chamber at that latitude and seems to have produced voluminous volcanism that generated a topopgraphic elevation that is now associated with the Lamont seamounts.[2] The volcanism is quite young and accompanied by hydrothermal activity; seafloor spreading here proceeds at a rate of 11 centimetres per year (4.3 in/year)[3] and a volcanic eruption in 2003-2006.[11]

The seamounts have produced hyaloclastites,[12] sheet- and lobe-like lava flows as well as pillow lavas[10] and talus. The total volume of each seamount ranges between 140–20 cubic kilometres (33.6–4.8 cu mi)[2] and the volume increases away from the East Pacific Rise, which along with other patterns indicates a progressive development of the seamount as they move away from the East Pacific Rise.[3] They appear to have been formed under the influence both of fracture zones and of a melt anomaly that also formed a 200–400 metres (660–1,310 ft) topographic anomaly west of the Lamont seamount chain[13] along with elongated volcanic structures;[12] a bathymetric swell is also noted around the seamounts[14] as well as a 150 metres (490 ft) deep depression that may be an isostatic moat.[15] The volcanism may be ultimately the consequence of hotspot activity.[16]

Composition

The Lamont seamount chain has erupted tholeiitic magmas[17] which contain olivine and plagioclase phenocrysts[18] as well as spinel but little clinopyroxene.[17] All samples taken from the seamounts contain sulfide globules, including cubanite and pyrrhotite.[19] In some samples, carbonates, celadonite, iron hydroxides, manganese crusts and mica are found.[20] They are relatively primitive magmas that were not stored over long timespans in the crust[21] and undergo simple fractional crystallization processes;[22] their sources appear to be distinct from the magma sources of the East Pacific Rise.[23]

Geochronology

The Lamont seamounts probably formed within the last 400,000 years.[13] While the ages of the seamounts are not known, they are by necessity younger than the underlying 740,000 - 100,000 years old seafloor; the lack of sediment cover and thick ferromanganese deposits as well as the youthful appearance of lava flows also speaks for a young age[2] although there is no evidence of hydrothermal activity, past or present.[14] The reflectance of the seafloorm has been used to infer increasing ages from 33,000 years at Sasha to 230,000 at "MOK".[9] Radiocarbon dating of foraminifera encased in lava flows of "NEW" seamount has yielded an age of 18,540 ± 216 radiocarbon years ago, indicating recent activity;[7] additionally, a sample from Sasha seamount may be less than 8,000 years old on the basis of a radium-thorium isotope disequilibrium.[24]

gollark: The mp3 example.
gollark: Are you loading it with `cat`?
gollark: ```mp3Hello, World!```mp3
gollark: txt.
gollark: ```txtHello, World!```

References
  1. Batiza, Sack & Allan 1988, p. 743.
  2. Batiza, Sack & Allan 1988, p. 742.
  3. Fornari et al. 1988, p. 65.
  4. Lavelle et al. 2010, p. 16.
  5. Ryan & Barone 1990, p. 10801.
  6. Fornari et al. 1988, pp. 65-66.
  7. Fornari et al. 1988, p. 66.
  8. Lavelle et al. 2010, p. 3.
  9. Ryan & Barone 1990, p. 10820.
  10. Batiza, Sack & Allan 1988, p. 741.
  11. "Report on Unnamed (Undersea Features)". Bulletin of the Global Volcanism Network. 31 (11). 2006. doi:10.5479/si.gvp.bgvn200611-334050. ISSN 1050-4818.
  12. Sack et al. 1989, p. 1246.
  13. Fornari et al. 1988, p. 77.
  14. Fornari et al. 1988, p. 78.
  15. Ryan & Barone 1990, p. 10810.
  16. Ryan & Barone 1990, p. 10825.
  17. Fornari et al. 1988, p. 71.
  18. Sack et al. 1989, p. 1248.
  19. Sack et al. 1989, p. 1258.
  20. Sack et al. 1989, p. 1249.
  21. Fornari et al. 1988, p. 75.
  22. Sack et al. 1989, p. 1278.
  23. Sack et al. 1989, p. 1285.
  24. Lundstrom, C. C.; Sampson, D. E.; Perfit, M. R.; Gill, J.; Williams, Q. (10 June 1999). "Insights into mid-ocean ridge basalt petrogenesis: U-series disequilibria from the Siqueiros Transform, Lamont Seamounts, and East Pacific Rise". Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. 104 (B6): 13043. doi:10.1029/1999JB900081.

Sources
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.