Koopman

Koopman is a Dutch occupational surname that means "merchant".[1] The spelling Coopman is more common in West Flanders.[2] Notable people with the surname include:

Koopman

  • Bernard Koopman (1900–1981), French-born American mathematician
  • Bertha Koopman (married name Bertha Frensel Wegener; 1874–1953), Dutch composer and music educator
  • Bram Koopman (1917–2008), Dutch Labour Party politician
  • Elias Bernard Koopman (1860–1929), founder of the American Mutoscope and Biograph Company
  • Elisabeth Koopman (1647–1693), German astronomer with Dutch parents, wife of Johannes Hevelius
    • 12625 Koopman, a Main Belt asteroid named after her
  • Gionne Koopman (born 1991), South African cricketer
  • Hilda Koopman (born 1947), Dutch-American linguist
  • Jan Coenraad Koopman (1790–1855), Dutch vice-admiral
  • Karl Koopman (1920–1997), American zoologist
  • Martin Koopman (born 1956), Dutch football defender and manager
  • Ody Koopman (1902–1949), Dutch tennis player, brother of Toto
  • Pim Koopman (1953–2009), Dutch musician and member of Kayak
  • Rinse Koopman (1770–1826), Dutch Mennonite teacher and minister
  • Ton Koopman (born 1944), Dutch conductor, organist and harpsichordist
  • Toto Koopman (1908–1991), Dutch model and anti-fascist spy during World War II, sister of Ody
  • Willi Koopman (born 1944), Dutch actress

Coopman

gollark: This person apparently reverse-engineered it statically, not at runtime, but it *can* probably detect if you're trying to reverse-engineer it a bit while running.
gollark: > > App behavior changes slightly if they know you're trying to figure out what they're doing> this sentence makes no sense to me, "if they know"? he's dissecting the code as per his own statement, thus looking at rows of text in various format. the app isn't running - so how can it change? does the app have self-awareness? this sounds like something out of a bad sci-fi movie from the 90's.It's totally possible for applications to detect and resist being debugged a bit.
gollark: > this is standard programming dogma, detailed logging takes a lot of space and typically you enable logging on the fly on clients to catch errors. this is literally cookie cutter "how to build apps 101", and not scary. or, phrased differently, is it scary if all of that logging was always on? obviously not as it's agreed upon and detailed in TikTok's privacy policy (really), so why is it scary that there's an on and off switch?This is them saying that remotely configurable logging is fine and normal; I don't think them being able to arbitrarily gather more data is good.
gollark: > on the topic of setting up a proxy server - it's a very standard practice to transcode and buffer media via a server, they have simply reversed the roles here by having server and client on the client, which makes sense as transcoding is very intensive CPU-wise, which means they have distributed that power requirement to the end user's devices instead of having to have servers capable of transcoding millions of videos.Transcoding media locally is not the same as having some sort of locally running *server* to do it.
gollark: That doesn't mean it's actually always what happens.

See also

References

  1. Koopman at the Database of Surnames in The Netherlands
  2. Coopman at familienaam.be
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.