Karl Immanuel Nitzsch

Karl Immanuel Nitzsch (September 21, 1787, Borna – August 21, 1868, Berlin), was a German Lutheran church leader. He was the father of theologian Friedrich August Nitzsch.

Karl Immanuel Nitzsch.

Biography

He was born at the small Saxon town of Borna near Leipzig. His father, Karl Ludwig Nitzsch, at that time pastor and superintendent in Borna, later (1790) became professor at Wittenberg and director (1817) of the seminary for preachers. He was sent to study at Schulpforta in 1803, going on to the University of Wittenberg in 1806. In 1809 he graduated, and in 1810 he became a privatdozent at the university. Having become a deacon at the Schlosskirche in 1811, he showed remarkable energy and zeal during the bombardment and siege of the city in 1813. In 1815 he was appointed a preceptor in the preachers' seminary which had been established at Wittenberg after the suppression of the university.

From 1820 to 1822 he was superintendent in Kemberg, and in the latter year he was appointed professor ordinarius of systematic and practical theology at Bonn. Here he remained until called to succeed Philip Marheineke at Berlin in 1847; subsequently he became university preacher, rector of the university,[1] provost of St Nicolai (in 1854) and member of the supreme council of the church, in which last capacity he was one of the ablest and most active promoters of the Evangelical Union. He represented the Vermittelungstheologie of the school of Friedrich Schleiermacher.[2]

Published works

Nitzsch's principal works are: System der christlichen Lehre (1829; 6th edition, 1851; English translation: System of Christian doctrine 1849), Praktische Theologie (1847-1860; 2nd edition, 1863-1868), Akademische Vorträge über christliche Glaubenslehre (1858) and several series of sermons. According to Otto Pfleiderer, (Development of Theology, p. 123): "He took as his starting-point the fundamental thought of Schleiermacher, that religion is not doctrine but life, direct consciousness, feeling. At the same time he sought to bring religious feeling into closer connection with knowledge and volition than Schleiermacher had done; he laid special stress-and justly-on the recognition of a necessary and radical union of religion with morality, treating both dogmatics and ethics together accordingly in his System der christlichen Lehre" His Protestantische Beantwortung, a reply to the Symbolik of Johann Adam Möhler (1796-1838),[3] which originally appeared in the Studien und Kritiken, of which he was one of the founders, may also be mentioned.

gollark: Mostly, you just need to use a bunch of intermediate instances to receive, reduce and filter everything.
gollark: I mean, it's not like *all* the subjects died.
gollark: You *can*, but loading all the information - much of it conflicting - into your brain *has* been known to lead to a few moderately problematic side effects.
gollark: Now, while modern mindstate execution is fully deterministic, people aren't perfect judges of the "best" thing and there's some noise, so you probably want to use comparison counting sort or something.
gollark: You can either read aesthetic appreciation data out of their mindstates and rank that, or just use one per *comparison* instead.

References
  •  This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Nitzsch, Karl Immanuel". Encyclopædia Britannica. 19 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 717–718.
  1. Nitzsch, Carl (Karl) Immanuel In: Neue Deutsche Biographie (NDB). Band 19, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin 1999, ISBN 3-428-00200-8, S. 293–295
  2. Karl Barth's Emergency Homiletic, 1932-1933: A Summons to Prophetic Witness ... by Angela Dienhart Hancock
  3. Eine protestantische Beantwortung der Symbolik Dr. Möhler's Google Books
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.