Juan Ginés de Sepúlveda

Juan Ginés de Sepúlveda (11 June 1494 17 November 1573) was a Spanish Renaissance humanist, philosopher, theologian, and proponent of colonial slavery. Known in Italy as "Gines the Amputee".

Juan Ginés de Sepúlveda
Born11 June 1494
Died17 November 1573
NationalitySpanish
OccupationPhilosopher, theologian

Biography

Epistolarum libri septem (1557).

In 1533 and 1534 Sepúlveda wrote to Desiderius Erasmus from Rome concerning differences between Erasmus's Greek New Testament and the Codex Vaticanus. He was the adversary of Bartolomé de las Casas in the Valladolid Controversy in 1550 concerning the justification of the Spanish Conquest of the Indies. Sepúlveda was the defender of the Spanish Empire's right of conquest, of colonization, and of evangelization in the so-called New World. He argued on the base of natural law philosophy and developed a position which was different from the position of the School of Salamanca, as represented famously by Francisco de Vitoria.

Sepúlveda translated several of Aristotle's works into Latin (e.g. Parva naturalia 1522, Politics or De re publica 1548).

Spanish colonization of the Americas

The Valladolid Controversy was organized by King Charles V (grandson of Ferdinand and Isabella) to give an answer to the question whether the indigenous peoples of the Americas were capable of self-governance, during the Spanish colonization of the Americas.

Sepúlveda defended the position of the colonists, although he had never been to America, claiming that some Amerindians were "natural slaves" as defined by Aristotle in Book I of Politics. "Those whose condition is such that their function is the use of their bodies and nothing better can be expected of them, those, I say, are slaves of nature. It is better for them to be ruled thus." He said these natives are "as children to parents, as women are to men, as cruel people are from mild people". These assertions in regard to some but not all Amerindians were made in Democrates alter de justis belli causis apud Indos (A Second Democritus: on the just causes of war with Indians) Rome, 1550. Although Aristotle was a primary source for Sepúlveda's argument, he also pulled from various Christian and other classical sources, including the Bible.

Las Casas utilized the same sources in his counterargument. According to Bartolomé de las Casas, Jesus had power over all people in the world, including those who had never heard of Christianity. However, he thought that Christianity should be presented to natives as a religious option, not an obligation as Sepulveda believed. Las Casas said that Amerindians ought to enjoy the same freedoms as any other people because, in his view, no Amerindians lacked the ability to rule themselves.

Works

Liber gestorum Aegidii Albornotii, 1521
  • Liber gestorum Aegidii Albornotii (in Latin). Bologna: Girolamo Benedetti. 1521.
  • Gonsalus sive de appetenda gloria, 1523.
  • De fato et libero arbitrio, Roma, 1526.
  • Cohortatio ut bellum suscipiat in Turcas, 1529.
  • De ritu nuptiarum et dispensatione, Roma, 1531.
  • De convenientia militaris disciplinae cum christiana religione qui inscribitur Democrates, Roma, 1535.
  • Alexandri Aphrodisiei Commentaria in dvodecim Aristotelis libros De prima philosophia, interprete Ioanne Genesio Sepulveda, Parisiis, Dimon de Colines, 1536.
  • De rebus gestis Caroli V
  • De rebus gestis Philippi II
  • Democrates secundus sive de iustis belli causis ..., 1544.
  • Apologia pro libro de justis belli causis, 1550.
  • Epistolarum libri septem, 1557.
  • Historia de bello administrato in Italia (in Latin). Bologna: Antonio Giaccarelli & Pellegrino Bonardo. 1559.
  • De regno libri III, 1570.
  • Opera omnia (in Latin). Köln: Arnold Mylius. 1602.
  • Democrates alter, 1892.
gollark: This has been known to occur sometimes, yes.
gollark: It's on osmarks.net. Please keep up.
gollark: Mostly, things just go into our fully automated internal market systems™, which then, due to the efficient market hypothesis, return the right answer.
gollark: We prefer capital, but yes.
gollark: If by "the laws of equivalent exchange" you mean "current GTech™ market interaction policy", then yes.

See also

References

    Bibliography

    This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.