Journal of Fluid Mechanics

The Journal of Fluid Mechanics is a peer-reviewed scientific journal in the field of fluid mechanics. It publishes original work on theoretical, computational, and experimental aspects of the subject.

Journal of Fluid Mechanics
DisciplineFluid mechanics
LanguageEnglish
Edited byGrae Worster
Publication details
History1956–present
Publisher
FrequencyBiweekly
3.354 (2019)
Standard abbreviations
ISO 4J. Fluid Mech.
Indexing
CODENJFLSA7
ISSN0022-1120
LCCN57003918
OCLC no.01782778
Links

The journal is published by Cambridge University Press and retains a strong association with the University of Cambridge, in particular the Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics (DAMTP). Volumes are published twice a month in a single-column B5 format.

The journal was established in 1956 by George Batchelor, who remained the editor-in-chief for some forty years. He started out as the sole editor, but later a team of associate editors provided assistance in arranging the review of articles. As of January 2012, there are 2 deputy editors and 20 associate editors. John W. Miles is the author who has most papers (117 times) appeared in this journal.

Editors

The following people have been editor (later, editor in chief) of the Journal of Fluid Mechanics:

Further reading

  • Batchelor, G. K. (2006). "Preoccupations of a journal editor". Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 106: 1. Bibcode:1981JFM...106....1B. doi:10.1017/S0022112081001493.
  • Davis, Steve; Pedley, Tim (2000). "Editorial". Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 415: 0. Bibcode:2000JFM...415S9514D. doi:10.1017/S0022112000009514.
  • Davis, S. H.; Pedley, T. J. (2006). "Editorial: JFM at 50". Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 554: 1. Bibcode:2006JFM...554....1D. doi:10.1017/S0022112006009566.
  • Huppert, H. E. (2006). 50 Years of Impact of JFM.
gollark: I don't know who to believe.
gollark: How about:If bees are deployed, they may be used against any player with a majority vote in favour of this action. Players subjected to bees lose 1 point. Bees are not considered a resource and if they are deployed an unlimited amount of bee-related actions may be taken.
gollark: ... can I edit my proposal to clarify things?
gollark: No, why?
gollark: It's a real bot.

See also

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.