Jacob Mchangama

Jacob Mchangama (born 15 February 1978) is a Danish lawyer, human-rights advocate, and social commentator. He is the founder and director of Justitia, a Copenhagen-based think tank focusing on human rights, freedom of speech, and the rule of law. For six years he served as chief legal counsel at CEPOS.[1][2]

Personal life

Mchangama's mother, Ulla Danstrøm, is Danish, and his father, Said Mchangama, is from Comoros.[3] In 2016 he married his long-time partner, Sarah Hammeken. They have two children, Leopold and Norma.[4][5]

Education and career

In 2003, Mchangama received a law degree from the University of Copenhagen. In 2004, after studying in Venice and Strasbourg, he received an additional degree from the European Inter-University Centre for Human Rights and Democratisation.

He was an assistant professor in International Human Rights at the University of Copenhagen from 2005 to 2007, and an adjunct professor there from 2007 to 2012.

From 2004 to 2007 he was a paralegal at Eversheds Sutherland. From 2007 to 2008 he was an attorney at Plesner (law firm). From 2008 to 2014 he was a chief legal counsel at CEPOS. He founded Justitia in 2014, and has been its director since then.[6][7]

Writings and speeches

Mchangama's writings have appeared in many publications, including the Danish newspapers Dagbladet Information[8] and Berlingske,[9] Minerva (Norwegian periodical),[10] and the American journals National Review and Foreign Affairs.[11] He has written on such subjects as the oppression of women in Islam, the 2015–16 New Year's Eve sexual assaults in Germany, and the danger of laws against “hate speech,”[12] blasphemy,[13] and Quran-burning.[14]

In August 2011, he contended that the European left was using the recent mass murder in Norway “to argue for limiting free speech” on the grounds that certain speech “can lead to murder.” Mchangama strongly challenged this premise.

In a February 2012 article, he maintained that “the combination of a debt crisis, an aging population addicted to public welfare benefits, one and a half decades of low growth rates, and increasing competition...is revealing the dark underbelly of welfarism” in Denmark. “It is not an overstatement,” he claimed, “to say that the balance between the state and the individual has been shifted decisively in favor of the state.” Because of a growing need for higher tax income, the Danish government was now harassing citizens in ways that violated their rights, and was dangerously skewing “the balance between public welfare and the free market...in favour of the former,” thus revealing the tendency of the welfare state to eat away at “the capitalist foundation which sustains it” and the fact that welfare ultimately “comes not only at the expense of economic freedom but also individual freedom and choice.”[15]

In March 2013 Mchangama dismissed the “putative consensus” around UN Human Rights Council Resolution 16/18, which was seen as resolving divisions between free-speech advocates and those who would criminalize defamation of religion, as a “charade.” While the US saw the resolution as affirming First Amendment-style speech rights, Pakistan saw it as permitting “advocacy of religious hatred.” In the middle sat Europeans, who, Mchangama noted, were often eager to defend Islam from criticism. While praising the US for “standing firm on the need to counter intolerance and hatred through debate rather than censorship,” Mchangama called on the US to vigorously confront other interpretations of R 16/18.[16]

A February 2015 essay on the 26th anniversary of the fatwa against Salman Rushdie criticized the widespread notion that “free speech should not be 'abused' to insult the religious convictions of minorities,” and cited a recent declaration by President Barack Obama that when “we defend the legal right of a person to insult another’s religion, we’re equally obligated to use our free speech to condemn such insults.” Mchangama challenged this view, pointing to a recent London protest by Muslims who “were perfectly happy to exercise their right to free speech and association” but whose “core message was that those very rights should be denied to those with whom they disagree, and that insult to religious feelings is a kind of extremism not too dissimilar from that of the murder of cartoonists.”[17]

In a March 2, 2015, Wall Street Journal op-ed, Mchangama lamented the “long-running pattern” in Europe “of bending to Islamist 'outrage' instead of defending free speech for all.” He noted with dismay that Denmark's current prime minister, Helle Thorning Schmidt, had demanded in 2006 that then-Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen distance himself from the Jyllands-Posten cartoons, that the Danish newspaper Politiken had agreed to a 2010 settlement in which it apologized for offending Muslims by reprinting Muhammad cartoons, and that Denmark’s former minister of foreign affairs, Uffe Ellemann Jensen, had expressed no sympathy for cartoonist Lars Vilks after an attempt on his life, even saying that Vilks “had asked and begged to be attacked.” Mchangama warned against the rise of “offense creep,” whereby jihadists were being permitted to limit debate, and urged the democratic Western world to push back.[18]

In April 2017, writing for The Washington Post, Mchangama called for Denmark to end its law banning blasphemy. He noted that, while Denmark ranked first in the 2016 "Rule of Law Index," the country shared a ban on blasphemy similar to that of countries like Iran and Pakistan.[19]

Index on Censorship's publication featured a guest commentary by Mchangama in 2017. He criticized Denmark's blasphemy law, noting that "Denmark is turning towards a model of militant democracy where free speech is often seen as the problem rather than the solution, and as a hindrance rather than the foundation of social peace."[20]

In October 2018, Quillette published a Mchangama article about the decline of free speech in cyberspace, pointing to recent policies changes by Facebook and Twitter, which had previously been strong advocates of free speech. He noted that these companies had previously adopted the American model 'viewpoint diversity' but then switched to the European model of "'balancing' free speech against competing interests". He noted the various inconsistencies in the application of such rules, such as the ban on denying the Holocaust while denying the Armenian genocide remains tolerated.[21]

In December 2018, Mchangama wrote with alarm about the proposal by President Donald Trump that news and entertainment critical of him "should be tested in the courts." Mchangama wrote that "Trump’s constant attacks against the media may be eroding the very popular support" for the legal protection of free speech.[22]

In support of his views, Mchangama has made numerous speeches and public appearances and given many interviews.

At the 2011 Oslo Freedom Forum Mchangama gave an address titled The West's attack on free speech."[23]

In 2018, he was a guest on the podcast The Fifth Column.[24][25]

In October 2018, Spiked (magazine) interviewed Mchangama as his organization was instrumental in having the blasphemy law of the Republic of Ireland abolished by public referendum. Mchangama explained his motivation for focusing on freedom of speech[26]:

I grew up in one of the most liberal, tolerant societies in the world: Denmark. No one ever thought about free speech because it was just as natural as breathing the air. And then we had the cartoon crisis, which was the wake-up call for me. It has shaped both my interest in and understanding of free speech, not only because it was such a dramatic event but also because it dawned on me how vulnerable free speech is.

In 2019, he participated in a panel discussion at New York University titled Hate speech on social media: is there a way to a more civil discussion.[27]

Also that year, he delivered a presentation in London on the history of free speech at Living Freedom, sponsored by Battle of Ideas.[28]

Clear and Present Danger podcast

From February 2018 to February 2020, Mchangama wrote and narrated a serial podcast, Clear and Present Danger: A History of Free Speech.[29][30][31] Among those lauding the podcast is psychologist Steven Pinker, who wrote, "We mustn't allow free speech to fade into a feel-good slogan. It is an unintuitive principle with a rationale that many don't appreciate and a history that many don't know. Mchangama's lucid history of free speech fills that gap and deepens our understanding of this precious concept." Author Jonathan Rauch has said, "Free speech is the most successful social policy ever — and also the most counterintuitive. Jacob Mchangama's delightful podcast series paints vidid portraits of the lives, ideas, and struggles of the people who brought this improbable principle to life."[32][33] In a review, podcast critic Elena Fernández Collins wrote approvingly: "Mchangama is an excellent historical guide, clear and precise, and with the right sense of drama when needed even though the episode has a practical focus rather than a theological or philosophical one. Interspersed throughout are expert opinion episodes, where Mchangama’s talent at guiding questions leads to a vibrant, insightful talk on a particular aspect of free speech."[34]
At the end of the 40th episode, Mchangama announced that the podcast was ending regular production.

Honors and awards

Mchangama received the 2013 Freedom Prize from the political party Venstre (Denmark) for his involvement in the public debate about rights in Denmark and abroad. In his acceptance speech, Mchangama underscored that freedom and democracy do not come naturally, they need to be fought for as hard in a country like Denmark as in any other part of the world. “No one has won freedom by being silent,” he declared. He has also received the 2015 Jyllands-Posten Free Speech Award, and the 2017 Blixen Award for contributing to freedom of expression.[35][36]In 2019 he received the Hoerups Debatpris from Politikken.[37]

gollark: It'd be easier to just copy a design from the e-web.
gollark: No lazy player will do lots of work.
gollark: Really, *who* will put in the effort to seriously make and spread such a stupid design?
gollark: That's not the same as banning one block from being broken.
gollark: That blocks turtles entirely.

References

  1. "Jacob Mchangama".
  2. "Jacob Mchangama Director of Legal Affairs, Center for Political Studies". The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies. Archived from the original on 16 January 2017. Retrieved 15 January 2017.
  3. Christian W (March 29, 2013). "Growing up half-Danish: A tale of two cultures". Copenhagen Post. Retrieved 22 January 2020.
  4. "Sarah Hammeken". sarahhammeken.com. Retrieved 22 January 2020.
  5. "Jacob Mchangama". Retrieved 22 January 2020.
  6. "Jacob Mchangama". 18 August 2014.
  7. Hecklen, Alexander. "Tænketank: Bandeforbud er op ad bakke". DR Forsiden. Retrieved 11 August 2017.
  8. "Jacob Mchangama".
  9. "Retsstaten".
  10. "Jacob Mchangama, Forfatter hos Minerva".
  11. "Jacob Mchangama". 24 July 2013.
  12. "Sensur som Â"toleranseÂ" - Minerva". 17 September 2010.
  13. "Når blasfemi bliver til racisme: En livsfarlig glidebane for ytringsfriheden". 11 February 2016.
  14. "Er koran-afbrændinger strafbare?". 3 February 2016.
  15. "The Welfare State and Freedom: A Mismatch".
  16. Jacob Mchangama (March 4, 2013). "A Questionable Victory for Free Speech". nationalreview.com. National Review. Retrieved 22 January 2020.
  17. "We Need to Defend the Right to Offend".
  18. Mchangama, Jacob (2 March 2015). "Defending Denmark Against 'Offense Creep'" via Wall Street Journal.
  19. Mchangama, Jacob. "It's time to end Denmark's blasphemy ban". The Washington Post. Retrieved 19 July 2017.
  20. Jacob Mchangama (March 10, 2017). "Jacob Mchangama: Denmark's revived blasphemy ban". Index on Censorship. Retrieved 22 January 2020.
  21. "The Death of the First Amendment in Cyberspace - Quillette". Quillette. 2018-10-22. Retrieved 2018-10-26.
  22. Jacob Mchangama (December 23, 2018). "The Return of Seditious Libel in the Age of Trump". Arc. Medium. Retrieved 22 January 2020.
  23. "Jacob Mchangama - The West's Attack on Free Speech". Oslo Freedom Forum. Retrieved 22 January 2020.
  24. "102 w/ Jacob Mchangama "Clear and Present Danger"". The Fifth Column. May 29, 2018. Retrieved 22 January 2020.
  25. Matt Welch (May 31, 2018). "How the Right Abandoned Free Speech in Europe". Reason. Reason Foundation. Retrieved 22 January 2020.
  26. Fraser Myers and Jacob Mchangama (October 26, 2018). "'We must never take free speech for granted". spiked. Retrieved 22 January 2020.
  27. "Hate Speech on Social Media: Is There a Way to a More Civil Discussion?". Arthur L. Carter Journalism Institute, New York University. May 21, 2019. Retrieved 22 January 2020.
  28. "Battle of Ideas – Living Freedom 2019". Retrieved 22 January 2020.
  29. "A podcast on the history of free speech". freespeechhistory.com. Retrieved 22 January 2020.
  30. John Samples. "A New Podcast on Free Speech: Many Victories, Many Struggles". Cato Institute. Retrieved 22 January 2020.
  31. Jacob Mchangama (January 30, 2019). "Clear and Present Danger Podcast: Philosophy Outside Academia". Blog of the APA. American Philosophical Association. Retrieved 22 January 2020.
  32. "Jonathan Rauch". Retrieved 22 January 2020.
  33. "Steven Pinker". Retrieved 22 January 2020.
  34. Elena Fernández Collins (January 3, 2019). "11 History Podcasts to Decide If the Past was Any Good". Discover Pods. Retrieved 22 January 2020.
  35. "Jacob Mchangama: About". Retrieved 22 January 2020.
  36. "Blixenprisen 2017". Retrieved 22 January 2020.
  37. "Jacob Mchangama vinder Hørups Deb". Retrieved 22 January 2020.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.